| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/21/2004 02:39:10 PM · #1 |
Just curious if anyone here uses the Canon 75-300mm f/4-5.6 III USM lens? If so, what do you think of it? Good quality? How is the picture quality from 200-300mm? Anything else you can think of would be helpful, along with picture examples if possible. :)
Thanks, Dan |
|
|
|
02/21/2004 02:41:14 PM · #2 |
Check out this thread. According to the photographer, these pics were taken with the lens in question.
|
|
|
|
02/21/2004 02:43:59 PM · #3 |
I have 100-300 4.5-5.6 USM, very sharp lens !
   |
|
|
|
02/21/2004 03:02:00 PM · #4 |
| Tell you one thing I love about the 70-300, it's great for candids. |
|
|
|
02/21/2004 04:06:00 PM · #5 |
You may want to take a look at this thread at DPReview. You could also do a forum search over there in the Canon SLR Lens Talk forum, there is plenty of discussion of this lens.
|
|
|
|
02/21/2004 05:08:19 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by pitsaman:
I have 100-300 4.5-5.6 USM, very sharp lens ! |
According the EOS lens performance survey for xx-300mm tele-zooms , the 100-300 is rated quite a bit differenlty (2.68, average) than the 75-300 (2.11, below average). Surprisingly (at least to me) is that the Tokina 100-300 f/4 AT-X is the highest rated lens (4.24, very good) in that group. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/11/2025 07:32:51 PM EDT.
