DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> General Discussion >> Near Olympic Disaster!!!
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 13 of 13, (reverse)
AuthorThread
02/27/2010 10:34:22 PM · #1
Unreal...this could have crippled the whole event...a planning failure of Olympic proportions
02/27/2010 10:52:29 PM · #2
Alternatively, the lack of such an emergency response might have ensured a crop of athletes with exceptional genetic resources for the 2028 and 2032 games ... ;-)
02/27/2010 11:00:33 PM · #3
Maybe they had a specially-branded package, and they are collectibles? One can hope...

R.
02/27/2010 11:01:17 PM · #4
Originally posted by GeneralE:

Alternatively, the lack of such an emergency response might have ensured a crop of athletes with exceptional genetic resources for the 2028 and 2032 games ... ;-)


In the case of China their children's children. :P

Message edited by author 2010-02-27 23:01:55.
02/27/2010 11:02:00 PM · #5
Was there some new event added that I hadn't heard about??
02/27/2010 11:06:58 PM · #6
They need to quit screwing around and pay more attention to winning. : )
02/27/2010 11:07:50 PM · #7
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:

Was there some new event added that I hadn't heard about??


no kidding I want to start training for the 2014 games!

Matt
02/27/2010 11:12:47 PM · #8
I have a feeling have the games you are going to see some on E-bay.
02/28/2010 10:18:17 AM · #9
Lemme see... 14 per individuals for games lasting what, 16 or 17 days? Doesn't seem out of whacks to me.

Remember folks, these are athletes full of mmmm,,, errr...well you know.

Ray
02/28/2010 10:21:18 AM · #10
seems many of them may be running on empty...

Originally posted by RayEthier:

Lemme see... 14 per individuals for games lasting what, 16 or 17 days? Doesn't seem out of whacks to me.

Remember folks, these are athletes full of mmmm,,, errr...well you know.

Ray

02/28/2010 10:30:48 AM · #11
Originally posted by soup:

seems many of them may be running on empty...

Originally posted by RayEthier:

Lemme see... 14 per individuals for games lasting what, 16 or 17 days? Doesn't seem out of whacks to me.

Remember folks, these are athletes full of mmmm,,, errr...well you know.

Ray


Hmmmm... that might explain some of the results...never thought of that. :O)

Ray
02/28/2010 12:34:47 PM · #12
Originally posted by RayEthier:

Originally posted by soup:

seems many of them may be running on empty...

Originally posted by RayEthier:

Lemme see... 14 per individuals for games lasting what, 16 or 17 days? Doesn't seem out of whacks to me.

Remember folks, these are athletes full of mmmm,,, errr...well you know.

Ray


Hmmmm... that might explain some of the results...never thought of that. :O)

Ray

Casey Stengel once pointed out that it's not the sex which causes a deterioration in athletic performance, it's the staying out all night chasing it ...
02/28/2010 01:15:58 PM · #13
And here I thought phylactic was a amateur competition, although I heard the competition was stiff..;p
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/25/2025 02:43:34 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/25/2025 02:43:34 AM EDT.