Author | Thread |
|
02/17/2010 11:58:30 PM · #1 |
UPDATE: Here is the new formulated stats. You will notice that your Average and Percentile rank is now different. If you go to your profile you will see that your percentile is a direct average of your entries individually and not based on your yearly Average Score Received.
I have taken ever user that has entered a challenge this year and come up with a ranking system regardless of how many challenges they have entered. However the formula is weighted by entries. The reason for weighting entries is simple; the more challenges you enter the harder it is to maintain a high score or percentile.
The following stats (Entries, 2010 Average, and Percentile) will be ranked individually with the lowest rank being the best. When added together it gives each users their score. The lower their score the better.
Note: The entries rank is weighted by a multiplier of 2.
Here's how everyone ranks as of the last challenge.
Enjoy!
2010 Rankings
Message edited by author 2010-02-20 12:57:34.
|
|
|
02/18/2010 12:30:22 AM · #2 |
Very cool Scott, thanks for taking the time to do this. I love seeing this kind of stats. |
|
|
02/18/2010 12:55:51 AM · #3 |
Thanks! Really fun to see how bad I actually am.. :) |
|
|
02/18/2010 12:58:32 AM · #4 |
Originally posted by coryboehne: Thanks! Really fun to see how bad I actually am.. :) |
LOL...Look at me, oh you can't...I'm not even good enough to make the list :)
|
|
|
02/18/2010 01:08:09 AM · #5 |
69325 smardaz 2 349 5.8791 248 74.5 248 1194 270
270 out of 970? I'm feelin pretty good about myself....thanks for the pick me up Scott! :) |
|
|
02/18/2010 01:23:55 AM · #6 |
Really really cool stuff :)
Thanks |
|
|
02/18/2010 01:58:22 AM · #7 |
Hey! Where am I??
edit: Oh, I see the catch.
Originally posted by SDW: I have taken ever user that has entered a challenge this year |
Message edited by author 2010-02-18 01:58:26. |
|
|
02/18/2010 04:13:13 AM · #8 |
54778 UrfaTheGreat 5 108 6.1338 137 85.9 137 490 38
I feel slightly thick about the headings though.. |
|
|
02/18/2010 04:15:19 AM · #9 |
28564 GiorgioBaruffi 6 70 5.9533 211 78.3 211 562 52
wow!
52° out of 970, i'm very pleased to be in this position, now i have to enter the top 50! ;-)
Nice works SDW! |
|
|
02/18/2010 06:00:33 AM · #10 |
5364 paynekj 7 53 5.1856 674 30.5 674 1454 399
Fascinating. It just goes to show how much worse I'm doing in 2010.
Message edited by author 2010-02-18 06:03:07. |
|
|
02/18/2010 07:02:50 AM · #11 |
Very interesting, thanks for putting this together.
98771 Rmac 4 166 6.5015 39 96 39 410 27 |
|
|
02/18/2010 08:29:10 AM · #12 |
This must have taken you a lot of time! Thanks!
I'm just happy I made the list!
111123 kimmymac 5,108,5.1429,696,28.2,696,1608,461 |
|
|
02/18/2010 08:50:09 AM · #13 |
76712 hojop25 6 70 5.4483 507 47.7 507 1154 255 |
|
|
02/18/2010 09:04:43 AM · #14 |
I don't understand the math/ranking system behind this but wow I'm in 5th place! That's really surprising. |
|
|
02/18/2010 09:51:01 AM · #15 |
98339 Ja-9 5 108 6.3730 56 94.3 56 328 17
well this won't last long but it sure is nice in all this company... |
|
|
02/18/2010 09:52:07 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by Ja-9: 98339 Ja-9 5 108 6.3730 56 94.3 56 328 17
well this won't last long but it sure is nice in all this company... |
ETA: Can't believe all the work that went into this Scott...all you math whizzes amaze me...Excellent job!!! Thank you... |
|
|
02/18/2010 10:21:26 AM · #17 |
You da MAN, Scott! Thanks for all the work that went into this.
R. |
|
|
02/18/2010 10:22:31 AM · #18 |
87252 JimiRose 5 108 6.6248 20 98 20 256 6
Woop! I don't think this'll last too long unless I start submitting a bit more regularly. I think I've got the highest average on that list too - don't know what's happeing this year!
e.t.a - Is there any way that this supermaths could be coded into the site somehow? How sweet would it be to have a live update of "who's hot?".
Message edited by author 2010-02-18 10:24:41. |
|
|
02/18/2010 10:31:11 AM · #19 |
Originally posted by KarenNfld: I don't understand the math/ranking system behind this but wow I'm in 5th place! That's really surprising. |
I think that would be due to your averaging being in the top ten percentile-wise.
I notice that all (or virtually all) of the rankings for score and percentile are identical -- that doesn't seem quite right to me. |
|
|
02/18/2010 10:32:15 AM · #20 |
20608 MAK 7 53 6.0066 194 80 194 494 40
Good work Scott |
|
|
02/18/2010 12:24:48 PM · #21 |
Hmmm, at least I'm in the top half. Almost in the top third. It should drop however after voting ends this week.
Impressive stat-gathering! |
|
|
02/18/2010 01:25:48 PM · #22 |
This is a great source of information Scott.
Thank you.
Every time I'm doing bad, I'll check this line beneath. It shows I have a lot of work before me.
28427 Nadine_Vb 4 166 5.4608 500 48.5 500 1332 332 |
|
|
02/18/2010 03:49:55 PM · #23 |
Cool stuff Scott! I was shocked to see my average for 2010 and 11th place...Will that page update automatically?
68256 jasonlprice 5 108 6.5065 37 96.2 37 290 11 |
|
|
02/18/2010 06:21:50 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by GeneralE: Originally posted by KarenNfld: I don't understand the math/ranking system behind this but wow I'm in 5th place! That's really surprising. |
I think that would be due to your averaging being in the top ten percentile-wise.
I notice that all (or virtually all) of the rankings for score and percentile are identical -- that doesn't seem quite right to me. |
Yea I know that the two are the same because the percentile is based on the years average. I'm currently trying to write a formula that will extract each challenge percentile then average that after removing the challenges the user did not enter. When I get that formula correct you will see a difference between the Average and percentile scores.
Scottt
Message edited by author 2010-02-18 18:22:54.
|
|
|
02/18/2010 06:30:03 PM · #25 |
Great contribution, as always! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/30/2025 07:25:30 PM EDT.