| Author | Thread |
|
|
02/12/2004 04:49:28 PM · #1 |
Had enough of winter? You ain't the only one! Got this gem via email recently. Had to share!
|
|
|
|
02/12/2004 04:54:48 PM · #2 |
| Took a good exposure to capture the exceptional sculptural detail. |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 04:55:28 PM · #3 |
I got that too in my e-mail, isn't that funny. Some people have a lot of time on their hands.
|
|
|
|
02/12/2004 08:43:15 PM · #4 |
| This is offensive and not related to photography. It should be moved to the Rants forum. |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 08:47:27 PM · #5 |
Under the new announcement, perhaps... but this was created prior to John's reminder.
It's still photography tho.
|
|
|
|
02/12/2004 08:49:40 PM · #6 |
| are you an adult scottk? if you were a 4 year old girl or a nun i could understand you being offended. grow up. get some balls |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 08:56:49 PM · #7 |
you should check out //www.watchersweb.com/funnyfarm/funny_photos.htm WARNING!!! ADULTS ONLY THERE IS ADULT MATERIAL ON THIS WEBSITE.....YOU WERE WARNED
Message edited by author 2004-02-12 21:04:11.
|
|
|
|
02/12/2004 08:57:37 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Armadillo:
are you an adult scottk? if you were a 4 year old girl or a nun i could understand you being offended. grow up. get some balls |
I think if you take the time to read some of the other threads that are related indirectly to this post you might find Scott's message here to be a form of sarcasm. I don't really think he's offended, nor do I think he really wants the thread moved to the rant forum. Of course I could once again be mistaken...... |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 09:01:27 PM · #9 |
| Just trying to keep in the spirit of the new, unposted Nazi forum rules. This is not about photography, but about sculpture. It should be moved. |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 09:03:03 PM · #10 |
There are no 'unposted Nazi forum rules'. Quite frankly, I don't have time for this. I'd like to watch a movie with my husband, who is finally home... if you all don't mind.
Grouchy? Me? You bet!
EDIT: Moved. Happy?
Now, go ahead and make another thread in General Discussion just to make me miss the movie.
Message edited by author 2004-02-12 21:03:49. |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 09:41:50 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by KarenB:
There are no 'unposted Nazi forum rules'. Quite frankly, I don't have time for this. I'd like to watch a movie with my husband, who is finally home... if you all don't mind.
Grouchy? Me? You bet!
EDIT: Moved. Happy?
Now, go ahead and make another thread in General Discussion just to make me miss the movie. |
Generally? Of course. About this? Not really. I guess my sarcasm was lost somewhere in the ether. It was the hypocricy and the arbitrary implementation of new policy that's bothering me. What would have made me happy would have been for everyone to take a breath, go watch their movies, and come back thinking clearly. |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 09:55:09 PM · #12 |
| I'm starting to find the casual use of the (other) N-word to be tiresome and offensive. |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 10:10:30 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
I'm starting to find the casual use of the (other) N-word to be tiresome and offensive. |
I would agree, how someone on the council tries (in vain) to control the forums is a Nazi is beyond me. I dont get it.
But, its not just here-its thrown around anywhere now. Anytime someone feels the have too much control. Boom...the word flies.
I dont really blame Scott, its just almost a cliche word now.
Message edited by author 2004-02-12 22:15:15. |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 10:30:16 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by GeneralE:
I'm starting to find the casual use of the (other) N-word to be tiresome and offensive. |
Hey, the left has found it such a convenient term to use. I just don't normally get to use it myself too often. I must admit, it was fun. I understand why they like to use such a powerfully negative label so frivolously.
:)
Seriously, I apologized elsewhere, so I'll do so here: it was far too strong a term to use in this context. I was simply trying to vent frustration that on a site that has generally been much more open and gradual about "societal" shifts like this seemed to have made a sudden and somewhat authoritarian decree in limiting, to some extent, the discourse of the site.
Still seriously, I find it just as offensive, maybe more so, that it gets used so freely and loosely by the left in describing those on the right in this country. It does severly cheapen the evil that Hitler and the Nazis perpetrated. But that's another rant.... |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 10:47:28 PM · #15 |
| I think the current usage of the other n-word got it's start when Rush Limbaugh applied it to feminists. But don't put a guilt trip on Rush. He should be excused because his judgement was impared by all the drugs he was taking, and he apologized for that and went thru rehab, so it's ok now. |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 11:01:15 PM · #16 |
Originally posted by ScottK:
Still seriously, I find it just as offensive, maybe more so, that it gets used so freely and loosely by the left in describing those on the right in this country. It does severly cheapen the evil that Hitler and the Nazis perpetrated. But that's another rant.... |
That's the part I was talking about -- I have no objection to the word used in a proper politico-historical context ... but I just didn't think it appropriate here (an opinion). |
|
|
|
02/12/2004 11:10:42 PM · #17 |
Excellent point, Coolhar!
Originally posted by coolhar:
I think the current usage of the other n-word got it's start when Rush Limbaugh applied it to feminists. But don't put a guilt trip on Rush. He should be excused because his judgement was impared by all the drugs he was taking, and he apologized for that and went thru rehab, so it's ok now. |
|
|
|
|
02/13/2004 12:51:24 AM · #18 |
| No offense General, but I really don't like to see it applied to a group by someone who disagrees with that group's agenda, as rush v feminists. I don't see it as a genuine comparison. It's just a cheap-shot derogatory catch word to my way of thinking. When was it that the feminists were in control and tried to exterminate a race? I musta slept thru that episode. |
|
|
|
02/13/2004 12:58:41 AM · #19 |
| Since this is a rant I'm gonna sound off about what get's me hot. I'm sick and tired of people whining about it being cold in the winter time. I love winter, it's a natural thing that happens every year. The cold, clear air is great for photography. Snow is really beautiful. It covers up a lot of the desecration man has done to the earth. If you can't hack it please don't burden these forums with your whimpering. Just move to Hawaii, or Arizona, or some other bland, no seasons place and shut up about it. End of rant. |
|
|
|
02/13/2004 01:02:45 AM · #20 |
Originally posted by coolhar:
No offense General, but I really don't like to see it applied to a group by someone who disagrees with that group's agenda, as rush v feminists. I don't see it as a genuine comparison. It's just a cheap-shot derogatory catch word to my way of thinking. When was it that the feminists were in control and tried to exterminate a race? I musta slept thru that episode. |
You must have misunderstood me ... I don't approve of the use of the word in any of the examples cited here or as used in the threads here. I just said I don't mind it being used un a genuine discussion of history or sociology, as in what type of psychology and media manipulation allows a government to convince its citizens to allow it to kill others unjustly.
I think Mr. Limbaugh is the worst sort of super-hypocritical pseudo-conservative exploiteur who found a profitable schtick and ran with it regardless of the logic or decency -- or rather the lack thereof -- of the views he unabashedly expresses. When I first heard his show I swear I thought it was satire .... |
|
|
|
02/13/2004 01:43:53 AM · #21 |
| He certainly made a fortune by bad-mouthing those he doesn't like. |
|
|
|
02/13/2004 01:50:57 AM · #22 |
| Limgaugh is simply a shepherd, leading the mindless. |
|
|
|
02/13/2004 02:49:30 AM · #23 |
Originally posted by coolhar:
No offense General, but I really don't like to see it applied to a group by someone who disagrees with that group's agenda, as rush v feminists. I don't see it as a genuine comparison. It's just a cheap-shot derogatory catch word to my way of thinking. When was it that the feminists were in control and tried to exterminate a race? I musta slept thru that episode. |
Do you bother reading posts or is it simply a knee-jerk reaction to what you 'think' has been said? |
|
|
|
02/13/2004 03:02:08 AM · #24 |
Originally posted by robsmith:
Do you bother reading posts or is it simply a knee-jerk reaction to what you 'think' has been said? |
I've read your post several times but can't see your point. Could you explain please. |
|
|
|
02/13/2004 03:22:04 AM · #25 |
Originally posted by coolhar:
No offense General, but I really don't like to see it applied to a group by someone who disagrees with that group's agenda, as rush v feminists. I don't see it as a genuine comparison. It's just a cheap-shot derogatory catch word to my way of thinking. When was it that the feminists were in control and tried to exterminate a race? I musta slept thru that episode. |
While I won't whole-heartedly defend his use of the term, he has repeatedly defined his use of that term as relating to the rabid support of a segment of the feminist movement for abortion. Which certainly is a form of extermination - millions of lives have been taken because of this agenda. So if extermination is the key determinant of whether someone is a Nazi, then Rush's title is much more apropriate for this feminist agenda than it is for Bush.
You musta slept through the 90s. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/28/2025 10:52:12 AM EDT.
