Author | Thread |
|
12/07/2009 09:31:05 PM · #1 |
Help....I can drive myself insane with color profiles and soft proofing in CS4...I think I have already.
I am getting ready to do a canvas print of my Manhattan Lights photo. It looks great (to me) if I set the proofing to CMYK, looks ok, but a bit overdone under Monitor, and looks god awful under sRGB. It should ALREADY be in sRGB...the particular file I'm loading at this moment is an 8 bit JPEG.
Why does it vary like this...these are screen captures, to show you what soft proofing shows me.
Here's monitor:
Here's sRGB:
Here's CMYK:
Help! How do you soft proof?
FWIW, my monitor is calibrated using an EyeOne. I have a Dell 3007 monitor, and I'm running Win7, CS4, 64.
Message edited by author 2009-12-07 21:33:08.
|
|
|
12/07/2009 09:36:41 PM · #2 |
Hi Neil,
Where are you printing the Canvas and what profile do they use for their printer? That is the profile to soft proof with.
Are you sure the image is already in sRGB when in Photoshop? What is your working colourspace? Do you convert to that colourspace automatically when opening a file in photoshop?
What does it look like in the Windows image viewer or in a browser (that is profile aware)?
Message edited by author 2009-12-07 21:37:25. |
|
|
12/07/2009 09:57:10 PM · #3 |
It's for Canvas on demand. (Though I am also doing some more prints to WHCC).
I've printed to both before...probably just using Monitor. Canvas On Demand has always come out great, but I think that's also because they personally take care of it.
Actually, so far, I haven't had many problems printing like that...but what's the point of soft proofing then if it looks like this?
|
|
|
12/07/2009 10:09:35 PM · #4 |
Proofing with the monitor profile only tells you what it will look like on the monitor not how it will look printed.
If you want an idea of how something will look printed you need to proof with the profile of the printer being used to print it. |
|
|
12/07/2009 10:11:40 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by cpanaioti: Proofing with the monitor profile only tells you what it will look like on the monitor not how it will look printed.
If you want an idea of how something will look printed you need to proof with the profile of the printer being used to print it. |
Well it's in sRGB format, so why does it change so much when I set it to proof sRGB?
|
|
|
12/07/2009 10:13:53 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by nshapiro: Originally posted by cpanaioti: Proofing with the monitor profile only tells you what it will look like on the monitor not how it will look printed.
If you want an idea of how something will look printed you need to proof with the profile of the printer being used to print it. |
Well it's in sRGB format, so why does it change so much when I set it to proof sRGB? |
I know you're frustrated but I'll repeat my question.
Are you sure the image is already in sRGB when in Photoshop? What is your working colourspace? Do you convert to that colourspace automatically when opening a file in photoshop?
Also, make sure the 'maintain RGB numbers' box is not checked in the proofing window.
PS. The only reason I can think of why when proofing in sRGB the image changes is that the current profile is not sRGB.
Message edited by author 2009-12-07 22:33:21. |
|
|
12/07/2009 10:40:27 PM · #7 |
Yes, if I call up "convert to profile" it says the source profile is sRGB (the same version it has in the proof).
And if I set it to convert to that profile, the conversion dialog preview changes to that awful version. Even though the source and destination profiles are the same.
|
|
|
12/07/2009 10:42:21 PM · #8 |
Can you post screen shots of what you're actually doing. What other parameters are you setting in 1) the convert to profile and 2) the custom proofing dialogue boxes?
Something is definitely messed up somewhere.
Message edited by author 2009-12-07 22:42:52. |
|
|
12/07/2009 11:23:55 PM · #9 |
I think it's something about the file...if I actually convert the profile to Adobe RGB, it looks fine; then if I convert it BACK to sRGB, it looks fine!
I'm trying to get a shot ready by midnight to take advantage of their sale, so I'm just going to leave it at that for now, and let them adjust colors if necessary. They've always been good.
But I'll experiment some more later, and post my findings (and any screenshots).
Thanks for your help.
|
|
|
12/07/2009 11:32:20 PM · #10 |
Weird.
It would be great if you post your findings. I'm curious to know whether, after going to Adobe RGB 1998 then back to sRGB and then proofing with sRGB, you still get the same strange results. |
|
|
01/15/2010 07:15:49 PM · #11 |
You need to ask your canvas company for a profile.
Without that it is pointless to do any soft proofing. Profile is basically a lookup table that will show how your photo will be reproduced using particular printer on a particular media.
In a custom proof window in a photoshop you can choose any options you like - it will swallow anything - even if it doesn't make sense. So chosing cmyk or rgb without profile is a complete random effort.
We provide colour profiles even for the canvas with and without varnish - as it makes a big difference.
Most inkjet printers are using 8+ inks and are expecting rgb files. they convert rgb into their own space.
So choosing cmyk doesn't really show anything. - Just that some random cmyk profile that you have installed on your pc will affect your photo in certain way.
So please ask your canvas prints supplier - and install their profile (right click on a pc) and then choose it in photoshop. do not select option 'preserve rgb numbers', select relative colorimetric or perceptual. paper colour simulation may not be necessary - it depends how the profile was created.
after you're happy with the proof do not embed their profile, leave your file as per original srgb profile, and let your supplier know as well,
let's hope that your canvas prints are going to be perfect...
Message edited by author 2010-01-15 19:22:51.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/22/2025 12:23:23 PM EDT.