| Author | Thread |
|
|
09/05/2009 07:23:57 PM · #1 |
| i know i know, its been talked about over and over again, but bare with me. My question is, in your guys opinion, Is the canon $2-300 better than the sigma? Thats about the price difference around here. |
|
|
|
09/05/2009 07:41:04 PM · #2 |
| I go tthe sigma and have no complaints, never used the canon though. |
|
|
|
09/05/2009 08:00:51 PM · #3 |
| I tried the Canon, didn't like the sharpness of the one I got. Sent it back and got the Sigma, it's my favorite lens now. Sharp, well built, comes with case and hood too. |
|
|
|
09/05/2009 08:44:12 PM · #4 |
Awesome, thats all i need to know :D I could use the extra $$ to get a few filters or something. Just gotta test the sigma before hand. Ive been told, some are known to have soft edges. Thanks
edit: do either of you guys have some sample pics youve taken? Perhaps an unedited, straight from camera shot?
Message edited by author 2009-09-05 20:45:04. |
|
|
|
09/05/2009 09:15:59 PM · #5 |
|
|
|
09/05/2009 11:26:50 PM · #6 |
I have the canon 10-22mm It is now busted!! The thing is coming apart at the focusing ring. I think someone tried to force the focusing when it was in AF mode and snapped it. Brought it into Canon to fix it and to calibrate the focus. Not sure how much this is going to cost me but I have a feeling I could have just gone out to buy the Sigma.
Had a wedding today and boy did I miss that lens!!
|
|
|
|
09/05/2009 11:48:14 PM · #7 |
| I know I'm from the opposite side of the aisle but the Sigma is exceptional. I love it and it's probably my favorite lens (though the Tamron 28-75 2.8 is inching in as most useful) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/25/2025 01:52:35 PM EST.
