Author | Thread |
|
08/16/2009 07:24:36 PM · #1 |
I have a doubt about advanced editing rules...
What would be a minor imperfection that could be legally removed from a picture??
I have an issue about that on my entry for The Ribbon challenge. I sent a ticket to SC but didnt got the answer until now...
Can someone give me a example? I think that what I did is legal, but I am a little anxious and wanted to know before the challenge start, so i could submit another picture, if necessary. |
|
|
08/16/2009 07:33:45 PM · #2 |
I tend to go by this principle: if you were to ask 5 people to describe what they see in the photo and not a single one includes it as something worth mentioning, then chances are it is "minor". |
|
|
08/16/2009 07:42:10 PM · #3 |
Mmmmmmm... I wish i had 5 people here until the challenge starts... |
|
|
08/16/2009 08:10:03 PM · #4 |
will it change the voters general feel or take on the image, does it change the image? |
|
|
08/16/2009 08:25:52 PM · #5 |
Sensor Dust, is one. in one case that I have done and it passed validation. a Bird. But this was because when i decreased the size of the photo down to 640 pixels the bird was no longer a bird but just a small little blotch in the sky so I cloned it out. I believe anything that loses its idenity after the size is decreased should be legal to remove. Simply because if decreasing the size changes it to the point where it would fool the voters into believing it is something else would be a clear violation of the rules however you have to follow the size limit rule. But I don't know for sure about this. even though it does make sense. Best thing for you to do is ask SC. I am sure one of them will give you an idea of what is Minor and what is not.
|
|
|
08/16/2009 08:28:53 PM · #6 |
I really dont think so... For ME is a minor imperfection indeed, and it is ok to be removed... I am just afraid that SC thinks diferent... Reading the rules and noticing that is possible to remove power lines I really think that what I did is just OK... I just dont want to discover that is a violation by being DQ´d...
On my judgment my edit is fine...
Edit to say that this is a response to Joker1114
To Bugzeye i say that I asked the SC, but i didnt get the response yet, and i am getting nervous because the time is running and the begginig of the challenge is coming...
Message edited by author 2009-08-16 20:32:17. |
|
|
08/16/2009 08:34:41 PM · #7 |
If you photographed Obama and noticed he has a wort beside his nose and you removed it you would have removed a minor imperfection. If you removed his entire head, well, that would have been a major imperfection. |
|
|
08/16/2009 08:44:37 PM · #8 |
In the past I've asked the SC and was granted permission to remove minor imperfections such as:
- Trash receptacles in the background of a seaside composition
- A sign on a wall in a photo inside a landmark
|
|
|
08/16/2009 08:50:35 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by AperturePriority: In the past I've asked the SC and was granted permission to remove minor imperfections such as:
- Trash receptacles in the background of a seaside composition
- A sign on a wall in a photo inside a landmark
|
Thanks for the examples, AperturePriority.
Just a question to help me on the scales: Would the trash cans be visible (even if as a dot) on the miniatures? What would be the size/color of the signal that you removed from the wall? |
|
|
08/16/2009 09:06:45 PM · #10 |
I just got an response from langdon saying that my editing step was legal.
Thanks everybody for the help!
ETA: Your photos are great AperturePriority! |
|
|
08/16/2009 09:08:45 PM · #11 |
Good news. Once the challenge is over you may want to revive this thread saying what your editing steps were, with examples as a reference for others. |
|
|
08/16/2009 09:28:26 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by Covert_Oddity: Good news. Once the challenge is over you may want to revive this thread saying what your editing steps were, with examples as a reference for others. |
No problem!!
|
|
|
08/16/2009 09:34:09 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by jotaga:
Thanks for the examples, AperturePriority.
Just a question to help me on the scales: Would the trash cans be visible (even if as a dot) on the miniatures? What would be the size/color of the signal that you removed from the wall? |
Thanks!
Yes, the trash bins were small and off in the distance, but they were definitely identifiable as trash cans.
For the sign, look at the plaque under and between the third and fourth bells (from the left). There was a sign that was about the same size, but stood out like a sore thumb because it was white and clashed with its surroundings.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/11/2025 04:50:00 PM EDT.