| Author | Thread |
|
|
03/23/2009 09:47:25 PM · #1 |
I'm currently using a Fuji S700 - a prosumer model that is smaller than the Nikon D60, with a non-removable 10x optical zoom lens, macro, super macro, video (not HD), XD or SD card slots, AA batteries, live view. Negatives on the current unit are impossible-to-use manual focus, auto-focus problems, grainy at anything above 100 ISO - even at 64 ISO, it has more noise than a DSLR, no RAW mode.
I'd love to get the Nikon D90, but it is HUGE! (by comparison). And, unless I buy the 18-200 lens (not in the budget, of course), I'll lose the 10x optical without changing lenses. It would also be a lot less convenient to haul around with me, and a lot more conspicuous when shooting. Not to mention the weight (I've done hikes with a Canon AE-1 around my neck, and still remember tiring of it).
I love live view for on-tripod work. I use the video for family events - not great, but still enough to remind of the event. Features point to the D90 or Canon 50D (even more expensive).
Words of wisdom? Alternative(s)? Suggestions on where to buy to get a good price, but not a rip-off joint? |
|
|
|
03/23/2009 09:53:49 PM · #2 |
It sounds like you place a very high value on portability, so you have some very tough decisions to make. In no case are you going to get the single-lens portability you have with your P&S, but on the other hand you'll have so much more flexibility it isn't funny, and low light capability like you've never had before.
You pretty much can't go wrong with any of the modern cams. Look carefully at the lens selections and factor that into your decision. Also, go and physically handle all the cams you are considering. See which feels best, and which control scheme you seem most comfortable with.
As far as places to purchase, if you do purchase online, be sure to check //www.resellerratings.com/ before buying. |
|
|
|
03/23/2009 11:37:39 PM · #3 |
David
I love my D90. I take it hiking with me. It goes a lot of places. I also have a canon P&S, which goes to the pub etc. The canon is for anything where I want a photo but don't really care about quality as much (snapshots, friends at the pub etc). The Nikon is for when I want to do Photography. The improvement in the quality if you carry the SLR is more than worth it, trust me.........
No, you don't have the 10x, but how good was the 10x anyway really. What quality was it at that zoom.......
Many questions, and depend on your need, but the quality I get from the D90 more than makes up for the less portable nature of a prosumer |
|
|
|
03/25/2009 01:59:31 AM · #4 |
| First, good luck. I made the move from the panasonic fz10 and fz5 to a pentax k200 last November. I MISS THE ZOOM. That is the first thing you will notice, if you do use all of your zoom as I did. Something you will have to deal with. By the way, Canon has just announced its EOS 500, which has live view, and video. And 920 lcd screen. And it is fairly light. |
|
|
|
03/26/2009 02:27:56 AM · #5 |
Yeah... at a certain point you need to decide if you want performance or portability. True, you can get a compromise to a point, but eventually you need to just decide. You might consider getting a D40X or Canon equivalent. Yes, they aren't the newest options, but they are more portable and similar to your Fuji. In any event, they will provide better low light performance. The lower price point will free up some money for you to consider the 18-200, which would be a good first lens for somebody making the jump over from a superzoom like that. It would still be larger, but not quite so much so. You might also look into the Panasonic Micro 4/3 system, called the Lumix G series. It's sorta like a superzoom crossed with a DSLR- more compact and easier to use but with interchangable lenses.
ETA:
Also keep in mind that your macro performance will go straight downhill until you invest in a macro system. There are "macro filters" but they have their own odd set of issues (my experience has been bad ghosting due to the multiple elements and fogging issues).
Message edited by author 2009-03-26 02:31:32. |
|
|
|
03/26/2009 06:46:55 PM · #6 |
Appreciate the thoughtful and helpful responses. Also, thanks for the tip on the EOS 500 - looks like closer to what I'm looking for - just a tad bigger than the Nikon D60.
I had a friend that had a Digital Rebel (not sure which), and it broke twice - the first time she wore out the shutter (camera repair shop said the shutter was only designed to last a certain number of shots, and she'd exceeded that by about 50%), and I think the 2nd time was a display issue. My old AE1 was a tank, and my Rebel film SLR didn't give me any problems either. Was the camera repair shop correct, or just blowing smoke? Other members' experience on recent Canon reliability.
I loved the feel of the Nikon D90 - very crisp and business like. Just can't get around the size. Would be great if all I did was studio or purpose shoots, but I like to have the camera with me for random shooting.
The Canon 500D has the DIGIC IV sensor, essentially similar to the 50D and 5D 15M sensors. But, I can't even find a release date on it - even Canon's site says the list of vendors will appear in April. Also, any thoughts on buying early builds of a new model?
|
|
|
|
03/26/2009 06:51:51 PM · #7 |
I am sorry, but once again I have to put in a mention for Pentax, not just because It is a system I chose, but because of the value for money you get.
A K20D, which is on a par, if not better that, a Canon 40D, is cheaper and has a vast range of lenses available. I think when upgrading, all current models from all manufacturers should be considered and tried before buying.
Good Luck with whatever you choose:) |
|
|
|
03/26/2009 10:31:46 PM · #8 |
In regards to life expectancy, here's a nifty site that has compiled people's shutter life.
You can also check DPReview for individual cameras to see the manufacturers life expectancy for shutters. If I remember correctly, the expectancy for the Rebels is 50,000 actuations. |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 09:40:46 PM · #9 |
For better or worse, I now own a Canon T1i (Rebel EOS 500) with the kit lens. Already missing: zoom capability, Fuji's show focus and lag between shots, Fuji's smaller size. Really liking: feel of camera and operation, multi-point focus (at least my poor eyes get a hint at what is being focused on), power save, low light results, image stabilization, image quality.
Thanks to all that posted advice - it was helpful, every bit of it. Thanks again.
|
|
|
|
05/01/2009 10:29:33 PM · #10 |
| Glad to hear you're happy with things! |
|
|
|
05/01/2009 11:10:32 PM · #11 |
| Congrats on your shiny new toy! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/26/2025 01:35:52 AM EST.
