Author | Thread |
|
03/21/2009 04:01:01 PM · #26 |
Been trying it out on some of my images...huge difference...
I have re-sized to twice my final size and applied sharpen - > sharpen 2-3 times.
Cheers for the heads up.
Message edited by author 2009-03-21 16:01:14. |
|
|
03/30/2009 08:25:32 AM · #27 |
Couple questions. Do you use this only for DCP and online photos? Or do you use this method for Printing? Also say you have a photo over 3000 pixels wide, can you use the method to sharpen and then resize to 2000 pixels or so to get that effect or does it work in that 1500 pixel to 640 range?
|
|
|
03/30/2009 08:29:55 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by drewhosick: Couple questions. Do you use this only for DCP and online photos? Or do you use this method for Printing? Also say you have a photo over 3000 pixels wide, can you use the method to sharpen and then resize to 2000 pixels or so to get that effect or does it work in that 1500 pixel to 640 range? |
i have been told that the results when printed are horible, so i haven't tried myself.
but, you don't really need to use this menthod for printing, as the size of the file is not an issue.
|
|
|
03/30/2009 09:50:59 AM · #29 |
Originally posted by dainmcgowan: Originally posted by drewhosick: Couple questions. Do you use this only for DCP and online photos? Or do you use this method for Printing? Also say you have a photo over 3000 pixels wide, can you use the method to sharpen and then resize to 2000 pixels or so to get that effect or does it work in that 1500 pixel to 640 range? |
i have been told that the results when printed are horible, so i haven't tried myself. |
This is correct. The Adamus sharpening technique is for web viewing only. It is a way of getting a smoother, sharper appearance in a low-resolution environment. It has absolutely noting to do with print-sharpening needs, where conventional sharpening works just fine. Adamus is particularly useful for sharpening images with lost of fine detail, to simulate that detail at low resolution and small size without the haloing of micro-detail that conventional methods show when used aggressively. It's a godsend for landscape photographers.
R.
|
|
|
03/30/2009 10:11:25 AM · #30 |
Then here's a good question. Any good video or other tutorials on regular sharpening techniques for Photoshop? Either for printing or just for quality photographs?
|
|
|
03/30/2009 10:16:52 AM · #31 |
Originally posted by drewhosick: Then here's a good question. Any good video or other tutorials on regular sharpening techniques for Photoshop? Either for printing or just for quality photographs? |
There are literally too many to count. Here's a good one on a very useful, selective technique I call "luminosity sharpening".
R.
|
|
|
03/30/2009 10:24:06 AM · #32 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Originally posted by drewhosick: Then here's a good question. Any good video or other tutorials on regular sharpening techniques for Photoshop? Either for printing or just for quality photographs? |
There are literally too many to count. Here's a good one on a very useful, selective technique I call "luminosity sharpening".
R. |
That's the only method I use. You can also find other methods here.Ron Bigelow Tutorials PLenty of good tutorials on his site.Look under the ARTICLES section. Use them!
Edit to fix link
Message edited by author 2009-03-30 10:30:12. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/03/2025 06:46:52 PM EDT.