Author | Thread |
|
01/12/2004 12:04:46 PM · #1 |
Went to the local park and captured some seagull shots over the weekend. Critiques welcome.
Seagulls
Thanks!
|
|
|
01/12/2004 12:22:48 PM · #2 |
Very cool photos. My favorite is 4294w. Your B&W ones are great too. Good job. |
|
|
01/12/2004 01:25:39 PM · #3 |
|
|
01/12/2004 01:33:10 PM · #4 |
Danny
I'm jealous! real nice work.
I need to get that third lens I have been wanting!
Until then I called the local pro shop and they are going to rent me the lenses I need at a very reasonable price.
I'm going to sell my EOS 650 film outfit and I was also thinking of selling my Nixvue 20 gb portable drive with LCD to get some other equipment I could get more use out of :)
|
|
|
01/12/2004 01:37:28 PM · #5 |
wow! Pretty fantastic! Did you have to pann to catch any of 'em in flight?
|
|
|
01/12/2004 01:40:19 PM · #6 |
Great shots! My favorite is 4368
Calvus - just so you know, I shot a bunch of flight shots with my Sigma 105 Macro including my action shot.
You don't always need a 300mm. Take a look at the last 38 of these bird shots They were all with the Sigma.
Message edited by author 2004-01-12 13:40:57.
|
|
|
01/12/2004 02:01:19 PM · #7 |
I have done that also but the DOF is so shallow I find it to be very tricky.
I'm more use to the 70-300mm. I use to visit the wildlfe sanctuary in Upstate NY all the time and I like the idea of planting myself in the brush or etc. and have the flexibility of not having to move around and disturb the birds and etc. I found they always came closer if I stayed in one place and sorta became the fly on the wall so to speak :) I use to love photographing the migrating geese at the sanctuary.
I think this is just another one of those things that falls under
"What ever floats your boat"
LOL
I did check oout your shots also and they are very nice!
Here is a wildlife quiz:
Can anyone name the Quackless Duck?
Thanks
Originally posted by TerryGee: Calvus - just so you know, I shot a bunch of flight shots with my Sigma 105 Macro including my action shot.
You don't always need a 300mm. Take a look at the last 38 of these bird shots They were all with the Sigma. |
Message edited by author 2004-01-12 14:05:04.
|
|
|
01/12/2004 02:02:08 PM · #8 |
I panned on all of them. I set the camera to adjust focus with the movement of the subject, then kept the bird in the center of the frame as best I could and snapped when it looked successful!
-danny
Originally posted by Rooster: wow! Pretty fantastic! Did you have to pann to catch any of 'em in flight? |
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/31/2025 11:11:03 AM EDT.