| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 12/31/2007 07:19:38 PM · #1 | 
		| | Interesting. 
 //www.thaisecondhand.com/view/print.php?product_id=6056960
 
 This maybe very very nice. Wonder if is real....
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 12/31/2007 08:16:59 PM · #2 | 
		| | It hasn't been officially announced as I understand it, but it's real. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 01:10:14 AM · #3 | 
		| | Guys, 
 Now that this lens is a reality, I want to know what you think about it, if you ever owned/used it. I see it going for $600+... and photozone.de give it 4 stars for optical quality.
 
 Would you recommend this lens at this price? I would be looking to replace my kit lens (18-105mm) sometime in near future.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 02:00:25 PM · #4 | 
		| | Hmm. Are all Nikon experts on vacation? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 02:14:19 PM · #5 | 
		| | Hi Prash,  I'm no Nikon expert, but I did get the 16-85 to go with my D80 and like it very much.  That said, it is still a consumer zoom and from what I've read not that much of an upgrade over the 18-105.  Had the 18-105 been out at the time, I may have gone that route with a sigma 10-20 for wider.  The question really is what do you expect from replacing you 18-105? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 02:30:40 PM · #6 | 
		| | | Originally posted by maynerd12: Hi Prash,  I'm no Nikon expert, but I did get the 16-85 to go with my D80 and like it very much.  That said, it is still a consumer zoom and from what I've read not that much of an upgrade over the 18-105.  Had the 18-105 been out at the time, I may have gone that route with a sigma 10-20 for wider.  The question really is what do you expect from replacing you 18-105?
 | 
 
 Thanks.
 
 I am seeking more edge to edge sharpness at wide angles. Is it unreasonable to expect with 16-85mmVR?
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 02:41:42 PM · #7 | 
		| | I'm not an expert, but I would think if you want edge to edge sharpness, you'd be better off purchasing a fixed focal length prime lens. You'll always have some compromise with a zoom, though they are a lot better now. 
 I am in search of the best zoom in a similar range. Haven't made a decision yet.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 02:44:09 PM · #8 | 
		| | | Originally posted by reephoto: I'm not an expert, but I would think if you want edge to edge sharpness, you'd be better off purchasing a fixed focal length prime lens. You'll always have some compromise with a zoom, though they are a lot better now.
 
 I am in search of the best zoom in a similar range. Haven't made a decision yet.
 | 
 
 I agree that a fixed prime might be my best bet for optical quality. Lets say one wants something in between the kit lens and the tack-sharp primes, is 16-85 one of them?
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 02:52:43 PM · #9 | 
		| | | Originally posted by Prash: 
 | Originally posted by maynerd12: Hi Prash,  I'm no Nikon expert, but I did get the 16-85 to go with my D80 and like it very much.  That said, it is still a consumer zoom and from what I've read not that much of an upgrade over the 18-105.  Had the 18-105 been out at the time, I may have gone that route with a sigma 10-20 for wider.  The question really is what do you expect from replacing you 18-105?
 | 
 
 Thanks.
 
 I am seeking more edge to edge sharpness at wide angles. Is it unreasonable to expect with 16-85mmVR?
 | 
 
 Sharpness is good, but, it is still a consumer zoom so probably not much different from what you have.  Here are a couple at 16mm from my portfolio.  They've both been resized and cropped a little so don't know how much value they have for you.
 
 
   16mm, f3.5, 1/1600, iso100
 
 
   16mm, f8, 1/15, iso800
 
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 03/15/2009 03:40:34 PM · #10 | 
		| | | Originally posted by maynerd12: 
 | Originally posted by Prash: 
 | Originally posted by maynerd12: Hi Prash,  I'm no Nikon expert, but I did get the 16-85 to go with my D80 and like it very much.  That said, it is still a consumer zoom and from what I've read not that much of an upgrade over the 18-105.  Had the 18-105 been out at the time, I may have gone that route with a sigma 10-20 for wider.  The question really is what do you expect from replacing you 18-105?
 | 
 
 Thanks.
 
 I am seeking more edge to edge sharpness at wide angles. Is it unreasonable to expect with 16-85mmVR?
 | 
 
 Sharpness is good, but, it is still a consumer zoom so probably not much different from what you have.  Here are a couple at 16mm from my portfolio.  They've both been resized and cropped a little so don't know how much value they have for you.
 
 
   16mm, f3.5, 1/1600, iso100
 
 
   16mm, f8, 1/15, iso800
 | 
 
 Thanks for sharing these, David!
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 01:38:05 AM EDT.