| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 11:27:21 AM · #1			 | 
		
		I am going cross eyed looking at these glasses.
 
 So what is the equivalent of a 70-200 in Tamron and a 24-70, or at least the closest to it??
 
 Anyone?? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 11:36:10 AM · #2			 | 
		
		| Tamron 70-200 and 28-75, respectively. Of those, the 28-75 is a very good deal that offers image quality comparable to the Canon at a much lower price. For the telephoto I'd rather have Canon's 70-200 f/4L, with or without stabilization. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 11:41:19 AM · #3			 | 
		
		| Hey Mr S, have I told you recently that you are brilliant!!!  ;) |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 12:15:55 PM · #4			 | 
		
		Originally posted by JulietNN:   Hey Mr S, have I told you recently that you are brilliant!!!  ;)  |   
 
 Sheesh, Juliet; you were HERE and I was using BOTH those lenses; you even played around with my 70-200 f/4L... Remember...
 
 Jejejeâ¢
 
 R. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 12:24:41 PM · #5			 | 
		
		I thought I played with the 10-22
 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 12:29:56 PM · #6			 | 
		
		Basically, it boils down to this, I was looking at a package deal with those two Canon lenes and a 5d body for 2 grand. 
 
 Then I looked at individual lens to see if it was cheaper. I have an 18-55, 10-22, and 75-300, so didnt want to repeat those lenes.
 
 then I found a used Mark iii for 800 on b&H
 
 Then I looked at the 50d then the upgrade, and now I am so damn confused that my head is spinning and I am not going to buy anything cos I am lost in the sea of bodys and lenes |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 12:37:37 PM · #7			 | 
		
		Originally posted by JulietNN:   Basically, it boils down to this, I was looking at a package deal with those two Canon lenes and a 5d body for 2 grand. 
 
 Then I looked at individual lens to see if it was cheaper. I have an 18-55, 10-22, and 75-300, so didnt want to repeat those lenes.
 
 then I found a used Mark iii for 800 on b&H
 
 Then I looked at the 50d then the upgrade, and now I am so damn confused that my head is spinning and I am not going to buy anything cos I am lost in the sea of bodys and lenes  |   
 
 So basically you cannot make your mind up..... typical!
 
 *GRIN*
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 04:44:36 PM · #8			 | 
		
		Originally posted by JulietNN:   Basically, it boils down to this, I was looking at a package deal with those two Canon lenes and a 5d body for 2 grand.  |   
 that price seems very cheap.  Have you checked the seller's reputation on Reseller Ratings? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 04:53:49 PM · #9			 | 
		
		| I recently replaced my Canon 17-85 IS with the Tamron 28-75 2.8 and I've been happy with it although I do miss the image stabilization.  I wanted the 2.8 for doing weddings and I also knew my next DSLR would be a full frame the the Canon 17-85 wasn't going to work on the full frame. I had heard good things about it and didn't want the price and weight of the Canon 24-70 and then I heard Will Crocket at ShootSmarter saying great things about it so I went for it. It's been good but haven't yet run it through any true sharpness tests like shooting a grid etc. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
09/17/2008 05:05:55 PM · #10			 | 
		
		| The 5D at my office sports a Tamron 28-75 f/2.8. |  
  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 07:24:59 AM EST.