| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/07/2008 12:42:31 AM · #26 |
I have the Sigma 70-300mm f/4-5.6 APO DG Macro for Canon and I find it to be a good value for the money. Yes, I know it's not the best lens in the world, but you can't really compare a $1700 lens (Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS) to a $250 lens. The extra reach is nice and you can get some good shots out of the macro. And besides I haven't seen too many T-ball games held at night so you can get away with a slower lens.
|
|
|
|
08/07/2008 02:52:30 AM · #27 |
thanks foolish, you actually read what I wrote and thats the kind of help I was aiming for which is what most people on here did give.
|
|
|
|
08/07/2008 10:38:24 AM · #28 |
Originally posted by Photomom1981:
thanks foolish, you actually read what I wrote and thats the kind of help I was aiming for which is what most people on here did give. |
you can atleast get the 70-200 f/4 for around 500 or 600 depending on whrere you go.. atleast youll have a constant f/4.. its kinda nice to have |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/23/2025 12:36:16 PM EDT.
