Viewing 40D RAW files in CS2 (any way?)

Olympus 7-14mm f/4.0 Zuiko Digital Zoom

07/26/2008 05:25:59 PM · #1

I just went to open a RAW file in CS2. And discovered it is an unrecognized format. So I went to Adobe to update the plug-in. And well, apparently, I need CS3. *argh*

I really don't have the money to waste on CS3 for zero features I am going to use except for a new plug-in. In truth, I am waiting for Adobe Lightroom 2 to come out so I can purchase it. (Yes, I know I can download a beta, but I have an important shoot at the end of August and am waiting to do so then in case Lightroom 2 isn't released yet. And I sure as heck don't want to drop the $$$ on Lightroom 1.x a month before Lightroom 2.

So is there any way to view/edit Canon 40D RAW files in Photoshop CS2?

one2one

Olympus E-5

07/26/2008 05:28:48 PM · #2

That's odd. Do you have the update to Adobe Camera Raw installed?

doctornick

Apple iPhone 13 Pro

07/26/2008 05:34:36 PM · #3

Convert your files using the FREE Adobe DNG converter and you can process them like any other RAW file.

dwterry

Canon EOS-1D Mark III

07/26/2008 05:45:03 PM · #4

The upgrade from CS2 to CS3 is a nice one. I felt that I got a lot more value out of the move from CS2 to CS3 than I did going from version 7 to CS or from CS to CS2. Lots of things to like in CS3, from a B&W layer, to Smart Filters, to a new configurable UI. I think the upgrade is only $150... something to consider.

07/26/2008 11:04:07 PM · #5

Originally posted by dwterry:

I am much more in need of a batch file processor. So any more investment will go into Lightroom. I just can't justify $150 for nothing more than file compatibility.

:(

I might consider Adobe's DNG format. What are the downsides to the format? Any?

Ken

Canon EOS-7D

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED

07/26/2008 11:22:11 PM · #6

I believe dng files are quite a bit larger if you have the original raw embedded.

Neil

Fujifilm X-T30

07/26/2008 11:33:44 PM · #7

Originally posted by theSaj:

Originally posted by dwterry:
The upgrade from CS2 to CS3 is a nice one. I felt that I got a lot more value out of the move from CS2 to CS3 than I did going from version 7 to CS or from CS to CS2. Lots of things to like in CS3, from a B&W layer, to Smart Filters, to a new configurable UI. I think the upgrade is only $150... something to consider.

I am much more in need of a batch file processor. So any more investment will go into Lightroom. I just can't justify $150 for nothing more than file compatibility.

:(

I might consider Adobe's DNG format. What are the downsides to the format? Any?

I had the same problem when I bought my Rebel XT and my Adobe PS CS wasn't upgradeable to the newer converter. That ticked me off.

LR is great. It's better anyway than using the PS CS converter, since all your adjustments to the RAW file are just stored in the settings, and you can go back and change any one of them at any time. My goal is always not to use PS at all anymore, just to use LR. Really cuts down on required storage space too, since with PS I always have a few versions of the PSD file and they are BIG!

BTW - One thing to keep in mind with DNG conversions is you'll still need to keep your original RAW file for validation proof.

Ken

Canon EOS-7D

Tamron AF 28-300mm f/3.5-6.3 XR Di LD Aspherical IF for Canon

07/26/2008 11:40:34 PM · #8

Originally posted by nshapiro:

Originally posted by theSaj:

Originally posted by dwterry:
The upgrade from CS2 to CS3 is a nice one. I felt that I got a lot more value out of the move from CS2 to CS3 than I did going from version 7 to CS or from CS to CS2. Lots of things to like in CS3, from a B&W layer, to Smart Filters, to a new configurable UI. I think the upgrade is only $150... something to consider.

I am much more in need of a batch file processor. So any more investment will go into Lightroom. I just can't justify $150 for nothing more than file compatibility.

:(

I might consider Adobe's DNG format. What are the downsides to the format? Any?

I had the same problem when I bought my Rebel XT and my Adobe PS CS wasn't upgradeable to the newer converter. That ticked me off.

LR is great. It's better anyway than using the PS CS converter, since all your adjustments to the RAW file are just stored in the settings, and you can go back and change any one of them at any time. My goal is always not to use PS at all anymore, just to use LR. Really cuts down on required storage space too, since with PS I always have a few versions of the PSD file and they are BIG!

BTW - One thing to keep in mind with DNG conversions is you'll still need to keep your original RAW file for validation proof.

If it's embedded will that change the exif?

SDW

Canon EOS-60D

07/27/2008 09:03:35 AM · #9

Message edited by author 2008-07-27 09:05:39.

07/28/2008 09:27:06 AM · #10

Originally posted by mad_brewer:

I believe dng files are quite a bit larger if you have the original raw embedded.

So converting to DNG, you have the option to preserve the originally RAW file? That might be an option. As I do have a 1.6TB NAS to store my files on.

Though if I am understanding correctly, I'll need to retain the actual original for DPC validation.

***

Lastly, is Adobe's DNG converter available as a stand alone free product?

- Jason

Medoomi

Canon EOS-5D Mark III

Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L USM

07/28/2008 09:38:09 AM · #11

Yes, but it's still a raw file, so you'll need Adobe photoshop's raw converter to bring it into a jpg or tif

07/28/2008 10:28:41 AM · #12

Originally posted by Medoomi:

Yes, but it's still a raw file, so you'll need Adobe photoshop's raw converter to bring it into a jpg or tif

Then what's the point / advantage to converting it to DNG?

violinist123

Canon EOS-6D

07/28/2008 10:49:44 AM · #13

Originally posted by theSaj:

Originally posted by Medoomi:
Yes, but it's still a raw file, so you'll need Adobe photoshop's raw converter to bring it into a jpg or tif

Then what's the point / advantage to converting it to DNG?

Long term archiving of digital negatives that won't be dependent on the application/whim of any particular software maker to be accessible 50 years from now. Supposedly.

Ken

Canon EOS-7D