Photo doctored on purpose? - DPChallenge Forums

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED

03/04/2008 03:34:37 PM · #1

Clinton ad

Regardless of one's politics, this is a photography site afterall. The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary. She is as underhanded as as they come and will stoop to any depth, including putting out Obama's photo in traditional Muslim dress. SHE is a piece of work.

FocusPoint

XIAOMI Redmi Note 8 Pro

03/04/2008 03:37:21 PM · #2

Originally posted by Flash:

Rush Limbaugh told us about this would happen couple of weeks ago. Funny how predictable politic is LOL

Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D

03/04/2008 04:09:58 PM · #3

Originally posted by Flash:

Obama put himself in traditional Islamic dress when he visited Africa.

As for stooping to any depths, I don't think the actions of either democratic candidate can hold a candle the Machiavellian actions to which the Republicans have sunk.

Louis

Nikon D800

03/04/2008 06:09:53 PM · #4

Originally posted by Flash:

The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary.

You mean other than the fact she's a Democrat?

faidoi

Pentax K10D

Pentax DA 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 AF

03/04/2008 06:10:45 PM · #5

It's the OJ thing again.

citymars

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED

03/04/2008 06:35:54 PM · #6

Originally posted by faidoi:

It's the OJ thing again.

Say what? Seriously, what do you mean?

FocusPoint

XIAOMI Redmi Note 8 Pro

03/04/2008 06:52:38 PM · #7

Originally posted by citymars:

Originally posted by faidoi:
It's the OJ thing again.

Say what? Seriously, what do you mean?

Many years ago when OJ trial going on, I think one of the papers (might be NY Post or NY Times) put OJ's picture much more darker skin then he already is. The reason is unknown, but maybe they made it look like a racial issue against him.

KaDi

Canon EOS-300D Rebel

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6

03/04/2008 07:12:51 PM · #8

Originally posted by FocusPoint:

Originally posted by citymars:

Originally posted by faidoi:
It's the OJ thing again.

Say what? Seriously, what do you mean?

Many years ago when OJ trial going on, I think one of the papers (might be NY Post or NY Times) put OJ's picture much more darker skin then he already is. The reason is unknown, but maybe they made it look like a racial issue against him.

According to the article posted it was to make Obama (and/or OJ) look more sinister.
My question, is darker skin more sinister? Who says so? And why?

alanfreed

Nikon Z9

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED

03/04/2008 07:15:20 PM · #9

Maybe Obama will try to make Hillary look more like a woman in retaliation...?

KaDi

Canon EOS-300D Rebel

Canon EF-S 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6

03/04/2008 07:19:41 PM · #10

Originally posted by alanfreed:

Maybe Obama will try to make Hillary look more like a woman in retaliation...?

Is that possible?

cpanaioti

Canon EOS-40D

Canon EF 70-300mm f/4.5-5.6 DO IS USM

03/04/2008 07:30:07 PM · #11

Nah.

//www.rickmercer.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=main.gallery&challengeId=90&seasonId=3

Flash

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED

03/05/2008 10:03:06 AM · #12

Originally posted by Louis:

Originally posted by Flash:
The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary.

You mean other than the fact she's a Democrat?

See...there you go again thinking you know me. I have a nephew in college that I encouraged to research Obama and determine if he might want to support him. The involvement of politics is improtant at that age and Obama seems to have a knack for getting young folks into the process. That is a good thing in my opinion.

As far as Hillary being a Democrat - she is only one in name. Her positions are actually more central or even right leaning than Obama's - however, she is a snake of the highest degree. I wouldn't vote for her if she were a Libertarian/Republican/ or any other party. And I suspect a lot of democrats won't either - come November.

The purpose of the post was to give yet another example of how devious she is. Some may of course disagree. Although I find it hard to imagine that anyone would disagree with me.

;-}

Nikon AF-S NIKKOR 24-70mm f/2.8G ED

03/05/2008 10:31:39 AM · #13

Originally posted by Flash:

Originally posted by Louis:

Originally posted by Flash:
The above link is one reason why I would NEVER vote for Hillary.

You mean other than the fact she's a Democrat?

See...there you go again thinking you know me. I have a nephew in college that I encouraged to research Obama and determine if he might want to support him. The involvement of politics is improtant at that age and Obama seems to have a knack for getting young folks into the process. That is a good thing in my opinion.

As far as Hillary being a Democrat - she is only one in name. Her positions are actually more central or even right leaning than Obama's - however, she is a snake of the highest degree. I wouldn't vote for her if she were a Libertarian/Republican/ or any other party. And I suspect a lot of democrats won't either - come November.

The purpose of the post was to give yet another example of how devious she is. Some may of course disagree. Although I find it hard to imagine that anyone would disagree with me.

;-}

Obama makes a lot of promises, but I have yet to see any details. I think he's a great speaker with an inspiring message of hope but with little experiences and scant details on how to achieve all he wishes for.

$hit in one hand, wish in the other. See which fills up first.

At least, McCain and Clinton have experience.

They're both experienced politicians and both are snakes of the same degree.

Dirt_Diver

Nikon D3s

03/05/2008 10:46:42 AM · #14

As this is why I don't like politics. This is just absolutely ridicules. GROW UP, people.

And one of them is going to be the next US president. WE'RE DOOMED.

Canon EF-S 15-85mm f/3.5-5.6 IS USM

03/05/2008 10:53:59 AM · #15

Originally posted by Dirt_Diver:

And one of them is going to be the next US president. WE'RE DOOMED.

You can look on the bright side:

1. Any of the front runners will be an improvement over the current administration.

2. Cheney's not running.

UrfaK

Canon EOS-650/T4i Rebel

03/05/2008 10:57:22 AM · #16

uh.. I suppose it was an attempt to awaken the inner racists we all are subconciously(?!) seriously.. that's the only explanation I can come up with.. but then we saw the 'hillary looks horrible and old' pictures as well.. both are attacking each others unique points trying to make them a problem rather then an asset. His race and her gender..

and wth was the 'obama wearing african clothes' thing .. doesn't every one have 'I'm being a silly tourist and doing it as the locals do it' pics somewhere.. people can push the weirdest issues..

Frankie_Lv

Canon EOS-30D

Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS

03/05/2008 11:00:26 AM · #17

Really dosen't matter who wins in my op. If anybody thinks anything is going to change there nuts. Why you ask ? heres an example.

How could America not know we are running low on oil, after all it's right there in the ground Alaska, Texas, and a few other states. A simple measurment would have told us we were in trouble, problem is all the DIP STICKS are in Washington. :).

Message edited by author 2008-03-05 15:50:39.

Flash

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 17-35mm f/2.8D IF-ED

03/05/2008 02:43:21 PM · #18

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

[quote=Flash] They're both experienced politicians and both are snakes of the same degree.

I respect your right to see it that way, but there is a severe distinction to me. Never would I compare John McCain to Hillary in "snakiness". I wouldn't even compare Rev Al Sharpton to Hillary in snakiness and he is pretty snaky. But those are just my opinions.

The Obama factor for me is the pure sense that people are involved. Yes there are questions regarding ability - as there are with all candidates untill they are vetted. But for pure "get involved" enthusiasm for the political process, it has been decades since this kind of inspiration has been evident. Regardless of whether I agree or disagree with some of his positions. Quite the contrary for Hillary.

I find it very illuminating that many persons who have had personal political dealings with the Clintons, are very eager to endorse someone else. Listen to the adjectives used to describe her and her campaign. Even peolple who have a fondness for Bill, find it difficult to like Hillary. She is an evil spirited person. Evidenced by her willingness to play the race card (multiple times) all while courting the very people she is dissing. Her behavior should be evidence alone of the historical existence of Judas.

jonnienye

Canon EOS-40D

Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L USM

03/06/2008 10:42:14 AM · #19

"experienced politicians",oh boy thanx,i feel better already,lol

Sigma 50mm f/2.8 EX DG Macro for Canon

03/06/2008 12:16:08 PM · #20

I think McCain takes the cake when it comes to poor taste in humor:

Why is Chelsea Clinton so ugly? Because her father is Janet Reno.â��

â�� Sen. John McCain, speaking to a Republican dinner, June 1998.

Haven't heard anything nearly as tasteless and crass from any other candidates.

goldenhawkofky

Canon EOS-400D Rebel XTi

03/06/2008 12:28:45 PM · #21

Originally posted by FocusPoint:

I have worked for a newspaper before and understand how easy it is to get the levels wrong on an image and cause it to turn out too dark. If one monitor is off you can really mess things up...

pawdrix

Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D IF

03/06/2008 12:45:47 PM · #22

Originally posted by Spazmo99:

I most certainly could never be a politician because that made me laugh my ass off. Mean....rude...with out question but pretty damn funny.

I like Alans comment about the Obama camp retaliating by making Hillary look more like a woman. That would take a real PS wiz.

Question: Do people still listen to Rush Limbaugh and if so...why? Hasn't he been proven to be a very warped blowhard?

Message edited by author 2008-03-06 13:02:15.

pawdrix

Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.4D IF

03/06/2008 12:50:05 PM · #23

Originally posted by goldenhawkofky:

I have worked for a newspaper before and understand how easy it is to get the levels wrong on an image and cause it to turn out too dark. If one monitor is off you can really mess things up...

I agree with that too. If any single group of people should have any knowledge about screwing up levels it would be us. ;)

I screw levels up all the time (especially with the frequency with which I change computers) and would never be so bold as to level that accusation against the Clinton camp. No matter how true it may be.

Message edited by author 2008-03-06 13:03:38.