| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/30/2008 09:37:28 PM · #1 |
I bought myself a new Nikkor 85mm f1.8 a couple of weeks back and I'm not entirely happy with it... Although it's an amazing lens, it doesn't really suit my purposes. So I've decided to go for a macro/portrait lens, the two that pop to mind are the Tamron 90mm and the Nikkor 60mm Micro.
I'm leaning towards swapping it for the 60mm Micro, any thoughts? |
|
|
|
01/30/2008 09:39:26 PM · #2 |
Originally posted by shalrath: I'm leaning towards swapping it for the 60mm Micro, any thoughts? |
Which one? |
|
|
|
01/30/2008 10:10:12 PM · #3 |
Originally posted by geoffb: Originally posted by shalrath: I'm leaning towards swapping it for the 60mm Micro, any thoughts? |
Which one? |
Probably the only one thats available right now.
Not the ~800 USD one not yet for sale.
Message edited by author 2008-01-30 22:10:51. |
|
|
|
01/30/2008 10:19:00 PM · #4 |
The Nikon 60mm f2.8D Micro lens is likely one of the sharpest lenses that I own. It is a wonderful portrait lens. I too once owned the 85mm f1.8D and have had some great results from it. But, like you, I traded it in. I replaced it with the 85mm f1.4D and love it.
|
|
|
|
01/30/2008 10:50:49 PM · #5 |
| I'd sure want to wait ans see what the reviews are on the new G version of the 60mm. |
|
|
|
01/31/2008 05:27:48 AM · #6 |
Okay... so the new G version looks good, but I'm of the camp that you may as well be shooting and not waiting for the new lens... it doesn't seem like a huge upgrade unless you really need the AF-S.
It seems like the consensus here is that the 60mm is a good lens, go for it you think? |
|
|
|
01/31/2008 05:30:24 AM · #7 |
I think in order to know which lens to buy, you might want to be a little more precise as to why the 85/1.8 doesn't suit your purposes.
i.e. define the problem before you try to solve it. ;)
|
|
|
|
01/31/2008 05:33:41 AM · #8 |
| As I kind of - round-a-bout hinted in my first post (:P) I want a little more macro capability... that's the basic issue I have with the lens. |
|
|
|
01/31/2008 06:00:38 AM · #9 |
Originally posted by shalrath: As I kind of - round-a-bout hinted in my first post (:P) I want a little more macro capability... that's the basic issue I have with the lens. |
And what kind of macro will you shoot? 60mm is pretty short for bugs, but okay for flowers etc.
|
|
|
|
01/31/2008 06:00:54 AM · #10 |
if you gonna use it for street or outside/low-light portraiture you will miss the 1.8, that's for sure.
i also own a tammi 28-75 2.8, but i'm rather using the 85 1.8 for outside shots than the tammi, cause i feel the 2.8 is not fast enough and does'nt provide that nice shallow dof compared to the 85.
just think about it...;)
|
|
|
|
01/31/2008 07:20:34 AM · #11 |
I mostly use my 28-75 and my 70-200 for outdoor work... not a huge fan of the 85 so far, so I'm figuring the 60mm will suit me fine.
Bugs and stuff, even flowers are not something I even wish to shoot, so macro will be mainly indoor studio work, I think the 60mm will suit me.
Message edited by author 2008-01-31 07:21:38. |
|
|
|
01/31/2008 09:21:36 AM · #12 |
| Sounds like you're mostly concerned with minimum focus distance. Why not try out a set of Kenko extension rings. Usually can be had for 100 bux or less used. They'll get you in close with the 85 1.8. I've got the 1.8 Nikkor, other than the doubled price I wonder why the 1.4 is so much better? |
|
|
|
01/31/2008 10:47:54 AM · #13 |
Originally posted by fir3bird: I've got the 1.8 Nikkor, other than the doubled price I wonder why the 1.4 is so much better? |
Build quality and speed (obviously - 1.8 vs. 1.4)
but the main thing is
Creamy, buttery, slobbery bokeh goodness. |
|
|
|
01/31/2008 01:15:19 PM · #14 |
I own both the 60 and the 85, but not the Tamron 90...
For working up close, the 60 is an excellent lens. As long as you're shooting something you're not afraid to get close to, it's a great choice. After a session shooting bees with the 60, I went out and found a used 105 micro nikkor. ;-)
For further away (3 feet or farther), I prefer the 85 f/1.8. Why I prefer the 85 isn't really quantifiable, but it just has a creamier look to it.
Both the 60 and the 85 are really sharp and have nice bokeh, so sharpness is probably not what should make your decision.
My (non-VR) 105 is nice up close, but the bokeh is kinda funky (the "shiny circles" are hexagonal), and at portrait distances, it front focuses. For what you're doing, the 105 is probably not worth the extra money.
No experience with the Tamron 90, but I hear it's nice.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/29/2025 12:26:55 AM EST.