DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Photography Discussion >> Night Focusing
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 16 of 16, (reverse)
AuthorThread
01/22/2008 07:28:18 AM · #1
I was out taking some pictures last night and was finding it very difficult to get the focus right.

With exposures of about 30 seconds the pictures come out much brighter than it actually was (I've yet to upload them) but at the time I could only barely make out shadows across a lake.

I tried a few shots where I just adjusted back from infinity but whilst testing other settings (ISO/shutter speed/aperture) I didn't have time to do this all night. So does anyone have any tips on focusing at night, maybe a really really powerful torch? : P

thanks in advance.
01/22/2008 07:31:26 AM · #2
What I do is get the subject (if you're shooting a group or whatever) to hold a mobile phone or a lighter, or an illuminated watch near their face so the camera can pick it up. Once you have the focus, click the focus to Manual so it doesn't shift randomly and you're good to go.

A torch would probs work for landscapes but on a big enough scene can't you just set to just under infinity and use F13 or so?
01/22/2008 07:40:56 AM · #3
It was a landscape, but in the day I seem to find just a tiny bit back from infinity is more in focus (for what I was shooting). I might try using infinity then, I don't think my lens has any measurements on it so just all the way to the end?
01/22/2008 07:56:35 AM · #4
If you use a smaller apeture the less ya got to worry about focusing.
01/22/2008 08:07:20 AM · #5
As you start moving to smaller and smaller apertures, please keep in mind Diffraction and the problems it causes.

Due to diffraction, you'll find that you actually have a "less sharp" photo out beyond f/11 than if you stuck to f/8 or f/11. Sure, you will have a greater DOF, with a smaller aperture, but diffraction eats into your DOF and makes everything less sharp. Plus, when dealing with long exposures, the longer it is, the more likely something moves (leaves in the wind, etc), creating additional blur.

With that thought in mind, I'll shoot f/22 to get a nice star effect on a light when I want it. But otherwise I won't go past f/11 without a similarly good reason to do so.


01/22/2008 08:14:23 AM · #6
All my lenses focus best just a hair before the infinity mark on them. That's where I put them when I shoot at night. When possible, using a flashlight/torch to illuminate the subject can work, if the subject is near enough (or the flashlight bright enough). As [user]Tex[zuser] said, it's easiest to get enough light on it to use Auto focus, then switch over to Manual and leave it alone. But of course this isn't always possible.

Smaller apertures do help, as do wide-angle lenses, with a deeper DOF.
01/22/2008 08:21:03 AM · #7
Thanks David, that's really useful, I was out from midnight to past 2am last night trying out all sorts of different settings, it's the first time I'd used manual mode.

Cheers Brent, I'll try that.
01/22/2008 10:29:28 AM · #8
What I do in dark stationary situations where small apertures aren't an option is to point a laserpointer at the exact part of the image that is covered by the focus-point that is relevant at that moment. It works across a large distance and actually simulates spot measuring since the only light the camera can pick up on to focus is the tiny dot from the laser.
In moving low light situations (e.g. night clubs) my 580EX helps out by projecting the red grid. Obviously this isn't an option in landscape situations when there's nothing nearby for the light to bounce back from.
01/22/2008 11:30:21 AM · #9
The laserpointer is a brilliant idea! I read that suggestion somewhere else and have yet to try it, but it sounds brilliant.

What I've been doing is having someone hold a flashlight and point it back at me from the place I want the focus to be and focus on that light instead and it's actually been working pretty good.
01/22/2008 11:39:17 AM · #10
Originally posted by EducatedSavage:


What I've been doing is having someone hold a flashlight and point it back at me from the place I want the focus to be and focus on that light instead and it's actually been working pretty good.


Unfortunately my missus wouldn't stand on the opposite side of a dark forest at 2am, I dunno...

:O
01/22/2008 12:19:06 PM · #11
Originally posted by EducatedSavage:


What I've been doing is having someone hold a flashlight and point it back at me from the place I want the focus to be and focus on that light instead and it's actually been working pretty good.

Originally posted by rob_smith:

Unfortunately my missus wouldn't stand on the opposite side of a dark forest at 2am, I dunno...

:O

I have that same scenario.....going under the ridiculous assumption that she would even be with me on a night photography quest, the idea of her standing across....whatever, to hold a light is pretty much out of the question.

That said, I've had some pretty decent luck just kind of "roughing it" and setting my manual focus just a "skoche" off infinity as OdysseyF22 mentioned.

The long exposures help, too.

[thumb]630023[/thumb]
01/22/2008 12:27:25 PM · #12
Nice shot Jeb!

I'll have a look how mine turned out tonight, didn't even get the chance to get them off the camera last night.
01/22/2008 01:00:16 PM · #13
I just carry a little mag-lite in my bag; shine it on the distance window on the lens and set a fraction under infinity for WA lens set on manual, unless I need close focus. If I do need close focus, I shine the mag-light on the subject and focus manually. I don't think I've ever done night photography with a long lens and a close subject that needs focusing and couldn't be reached by the mag-lite. My night shots are usually WA, and the DOF is so great that it is not an issue.

R.
01/22/2008 01:41:13 PM · #14
Here's a good DOF calculator: //www.dofmaster.com/dofjs.html

On my D200, if I focus at infinity, even at 200mm, then at F/11 my DOF comes all the way back to 580 feet away. At 50mm, DOF is from 36 feet to infinity.

If I focus 50 feet away at F/11, then at 50mm the sharp zone runs from 21 feet to infinity.

So for landscapes, focus precision just isn't important.
01/22/2008 01:53:19 PM · #15
On a related topic...the Canon 40D has a "Long Exposure Noise Reduction" feature (not to be confused with the High ISO Noise Reduction feature). One night, I took a 30 minute exposure and then the camera took another shot that was equally as long (30 minutes). I understand this is what is suppose to happen.

My question is, is this feature beneficial when shooting in RAW? Or does it help only with JPGs?
01/22/2008 02:55:48 PM · #16
Originally posted by AperturePriority:

On a related topic...the Canon 40D has a "Long Exposure Noise Reduction" feature (not to be confused with the High ISO Noise Reduction feature). One night, I took a 30 minute exposure and then the camera took another shot that was equally as long (30 minutes). I understand this is what is suppose to happen.

My question is, is this feature beneficial when shooting in RAW? Or does it help only with JPGs?


Works with both. The noise is "sensor noise" and it increases with long exposures, as different parts of the sensor heat up at different rates. It's problematical when you're shooting stars, though, especially with WA, because it tends to read stars as noise. Frankly, I think it's a PITA and I don't use it, I'm way too impatient. But some people swear by it.

R.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 08/26/2025 02:53:10 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/26/2025 02:53:10 PM EDT.