Author | Thread |
|
12/11/2007 02:06:54 PM · #1 |
I have photos on a cd taken by someone else that are straight from the camera (JPGS).
I need to get them printed, I chose Mpix, vs something local.
The shots are from a 20d.
They are still at 72dpi.
Do I need to upscale them to 240 or 300dpi before uploaded to Mpix?
If so can I "batch" that someway?
I have PS2/Lightroom.
PS- I am just wondering about the DPI issue, not editing them.
Message edited by author 2007-12-11 14:07:21. |
|
|
12/11/2007 02:26:38 PM · #2 |
That's a good question.. I use Mpix for everything and I would suggest sending them this question.. They've answered questions from me before rather quickly, so it wasn't like I had to wait days for a response. |
|
|
12/11/2007 02:30:22 PM · #3 |
Hi Tim,
Short Answer:
An image file does not have DPI or PPI. A file has only resolution: width x height pixels. So there's no reason to go through and do anything to the images. The size of your prints (and image file resolution) will determine the effective DPI.
Only a display medium has DPI/PPI - like your monitor or a printer.
More than you wanted to know: =)
For example, a typical monitor might display 100 pixels per inch (it varies, depending on screen resolution and monitor size), so an image of 640x480 px would show up as 6.4x4.8 inches on the screen.
A printer, with a native DPI of 300, would print the 640x480 image at 2.13x1.6 inches. However, as you know, you can print an image at any size you want. If I printed the 640x480 image as an 8x10" print, it would have an effective DPI of about 80, and it wouldn't look good.
Of course, viewing distance comes into play, but assuming a photo print that people view up close, I wouldn't print anything at less than ~150dpi. My Rebel XT has a resolution of 3456x2304. With my 150 DPI rule of thumb, I can make prints of up to 23x15 inches.
A 20D (assuming Large JPEG mode) has a resolution very similar to my XT.
Cheers,
-Jeff
Message edited by author 2007-12-11 14:31:11. |
|
|
12/11/2007 03:22:30 PM · #4 |
I'm not certain what PS2 is. There is PhotoShop CS2 around, but PhotoShop2 might've been only available running in DOS. I think I started with PhotoShop4 or 5.
I have a 20D also and you should easily get a 300dpi 4x6 image easily. You can also automate this by creating an action. Checkout my tutorial Creating Photoshop Actions.
I would first resample to 300dpi. In the menu, goto Image/Image Size. Uncheck "Resample Image" and change the resolution to 300ppi.
To crop, I use the "Fit Image" automation. This way if it's a landscape or portrait orentation doesn't matter. In the menu, goto File/Automate/Fit Image and use 1800 width and 1800 height. This will make the longest side 1800.
Good Luck |
|
|
12/11/2007 03:32:19 PM · #5 |
I meant cs2-- twas a typo--
|
|
|
12/11/2007 03:40:00 PM · #6 |
OKay this is from Mpixs website---
Recommended file size
Digital Cameras measure their resolution in pixels. These pixels are NOT measured per inch, but are a total count of how many pixels were used to capture the entire image. If you take a digital photo at 1600x1200 pixels, the total pixel count of the captured image will be 1,920,000 pixels. Whether you print this 1600x1200 image as a 8âx10â photo or an 16âx20â photo, it will still have 1,920,000 pixels.
Photos intended for print should be taken at the highest [pixel] resolution possible for the best print quality. Printing at different sizes does not change how many pixels are in the original image. Lower resolution photos printed at larger sizes stretch the pixels beyond the point where they look clear and sharp. The best printer can not make a low resolution photo look better than its original quality⦠but it sure can make beautiful prints when given a high resolution photo to work with!
Then in the FAQ-- the have this..
FAQs
What DPI is optimal?
250 dpi is recommended.
|
|
|
12/11/2007 04:07:46 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by MPIX site: Digital Cameras measure their resolution in pixels. These pixels are NOT measured per inch, but are a total count of how many pixels were used to capture the entire image. If you take a digital photo at 1600x1200 pixels, the total pixel count of the captured image will be 1,920,000 pixels. Whether you print this 1600x1200 image as a 8âx10â photo or an 16âx20â photo, it will still have 1,920,000 pixels.
Photos intended for print should be taken at the highest [pixel] resolution possible for the best print quality. Printing at different sizes does not change how many pixels are in the original image. Lower resolution photos printed at larger sizes stretch the pixels beyond the point where they look clear and sharp. The best printer can not make a low resolution photo look better than its original quality⦠but it sure can make beautiful prints when given a high resolution photo to work with!
|
That sounds an awful lot like my post above...
Originally posted by buzzrock:
What DPI is optimal?
250 dpi is recommended. |
Ah, so my rule of thumb was 150, theirs is 250. So they would suggest that I print my XT images at no larger than 13x9.2".
...
Or, if you're really in the mood to create an action to go through and lossily resize all your images, go for it.
...
Oops - bit my tongue a little too late. Apologies for the snarkiness. |
|
|
12/14/2007 05:54:47 PM · #8 |
Got my piccs back today-- and MPIX does have really good quality, blows away walmart/sams club..
One mistake made though was in the wallets. You have to allow for more room on top then you think- dont crop tight-- reason is, the wallets peel off, so you lose some of the picture when peeling-- hence I lost some hair on very tight crops---- cheap enuf, I'm gonna reorder more wallets, w/ different crops.. |
|
|
12/14/2007 06:00:47 PM · #9 |
Sidenote-- anyone ever use the lustre coating, if so whats it look like? Is it better or just a preference? |
|
|
12/14/2007 06:45:23 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by buzzrock: Sidenote-- anyone ever use the lustre coating, if so whats it look like? Is it better or just a preference? |
I used it on a matboard print for Becki and one regular print for Cindy. It makes the colours very very rich. It really is beautiful. |
|
|
12/14/2007 07:48:03 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by buzzrock: Sidenote-- anyone ever use the lustre coating, if so whats it look like? Is it better or just a preference? |
Give the metallic paper a try sometime, too -- makes a really cool print, especially if the image has some bright yellows and pinks. I used it for the pictures we put in our Xmas cards this year and I keep getting comments about how cool the pics look from everyone we sent them to. |
|
|
12/14/2007 08:45:01 PM · #12 |
Generally speaking 150DPI is WalMart level printery. If you look closely, you can see a bit of graininess, but only if you have reason to look closer.
200 DPI is "good quality" when compared to above.
250 DPI is slightly better.
300 DPI is generally considered a minimum for high quality prints as most eyes cannot resolve more than this even looking closely. Get too close and you can't focus. Most good quality printers are able to handle a 300 DPI output. Most high volume printeries don't.
With digital imagery, DPI is completely irrelevant.
When printing, DPI is determined by the total number of pixels compared to the size of the print you are making, compared to the absolute level of quality provided by the printery.
If MPIX is offering prints at 250 DPI, that's pretty good. There's not a huge difference between 250 and 300 DPI. You have to get pretty close to find faults with either.
Why might they state a DPI number? That would likely be their minimum. You would be expected to calculate this yourself. For example, if you cropped an image heavily so the result was 800x600 and you sent it off to be printed at 8x10, your DPI would be significantly lower than the 250 minimum. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/27/2025 05:37:38 AM EDT.