DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> General Discussion >> Help me if you can.
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 5 of 5, (reverse)
AuthorThread
11/21/2007 01:49:37 PM · #1
Challenges Entered: 283
Votes Cast: 27,235
Avg Vote Cast: 5.4480
Votes Received: 60,030
Avg Vote Received: 5.1713

I have now been a member for 3 years and am really enjoying DPC, and I know I do antagonize at times with my way of thinking on different matters,these are only thinking allowed.
When it comes to receiving votes on images that I believe are quite reasonable for the challenge I am comming up well short of what I believe the photo would possibly score at.

WHAT AM I DOING WRONG

I DID BELIEVE THIS PHOTO WOULD HAVE FITTED THE CHALLENGE AND SCORED BETTER, HELP.

73rd place with an
average vote of 5.4078



Message edited by author 2007-11-21 13:51:52.
11/21/2007 02:08:19 PM · #2
left a comment
11/21/2007 02:11:19 PM · #3
I'll leave a comment here:

The photo is compositionally uninspiring. Flying gulls is nice, but we see them leaving the frame, and that doesn't help the composition. There is no expression left in the photo when you can't see the faces of the subjects and their posture does not make up for that lack of face. As well, there are numerous little "waterspots" all over the image. Unsure what that is, but it takes away from the quality of the composition. Finally, the boken as foreground was not readily discernable. It looked like backgrond bokeh to me. The image just didn't pop, sadly.
11/21/2007 02:11:45 PM · #4
My take - and since mine barely broke 5.0 this should be taken with the proverbial grain of salt -

Birds look good, nicely exposed, sharp. Could use a little more context information - don't get a sense of the surrondings.

Your forground bokeh does fit the challenge, but I don't feel like it improves the photo. It doesn't (to me) provide much by way of context or support a narrative. Is it a better photo than it would have been without the FGB? I don't think so...

My personal fav for this challenge was this one:



where the use of bokeh really tells the story of the photo.

But hey, as I say, you did better than I did! ;)
11/21/2007 04:42:33 PM · #5
Originally posted by frisca:

I'll leave a comment here:

The photo is compositionally uninspiring. Flying gulls is nice, but we see them leaving the frame, and that doesn't help the composition. There is no expression left in the photo when you can't see the faces of the subjects and their posture does not make up for that lack of face. As well, there are numerous little "waterspots" all over the image. Unsure what that is, but it takes away from the quality of the composition. Finally, the boken as foreground was not readily discernable. It looked like backgrond bokeh to me. The image just didn't pop, sadly.


The "waterspots" are background bokeh rings on the oof sand the gulls are flying over, the bokeh as foreground is what the challenge was all about, and as the oof is in front of the gulls I find it hard to believe you thought it was background bokeh. I have noticed some of the top photos used massive rear oof with minimal forground "wow". the subjects flying away is part of nature IMHO they take you into the photo as the eye follows them, I would have had to stand in the water waist deep to see the head on shot, but do see your point in this.

It does appear the voters voted on the massive oof in the image as this enhanced the image regardless of its foreground impact on the photo.

Message edited by author 2007-11-21 16:56:45.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 09/11/2025 09:41:01 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/11/2025 09:41:01 AM EDT.