| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/22/2007 06:05:49 PM · #1 |
First, a hearty congrats to the high-scoring shots. I voted many of them 8-10 myself (including the winner, which is just an incredible shot).
That said, I'd like to suggest that the next macro challenge repeat the "no bugs or flowers" version to kick people into thinking about other subjects.
Bugs and flowers are outstanding macros subjects precisely because they offer whole new levels of detail and viewpoints when seen close up. But let's challenge ourselves. :)
|
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:09:46 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:11:52 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:17:05 PM · #4 |
Add my hearty agreement :)
|
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:17:59 PM · #5 |
| How about rather than restricting content, restrict technique. All entries to be shot at F22 to F45+. |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:19:14 PM · #6 |
How about rather than restricting content, restrict technique. All entries to be shot at F22 to F45+.
:-( restricts us point & shooters who don't yet have the fancy equipment. |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:37:17 PM · #7 |
| restricting bugs and flowers will make it much more interesting and creative, great idea! |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:42:12 PM · #8 |
on the last challenge there would be one or two shots left, woohoo my first ribbon
|
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:51:23 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by levyj413:
That said, I'd like to suggest that the next macro challenge repeat the "no bugs or flowers" version to kick people into thinking about other subjects. |
Here, here. I'm all for it. |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 06:55:48 PM · #10 |
| I second that emotion! good challenge idea. |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 07:12:26 PM · #11 |
one of the reasons i did not enter last macro challenge was that i knew the winners would be a bug or a flower macro and i did not want to shoot that.
so i am all for a macro without bug/flower. |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 07:15:59 PM · #12 |
| Wouldn't it be a challenge to beat all those bugs and flowers? |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 07:31:00 PM · #13 |
| Yeah next macro should just be of eyes...... |
|
|
|
10/22/2007 09:10:47 PM · #14 |
Originally posted by freakin_hilarious:
Sounds good to me! |
I thought it might. ;)
|
|
|
|
10/23/2007 02:38:45 AM · #15 |
There is a precedent.... Without Bugs or Flowers
(I would hope it would be without close-ups of eyes, too). ;-) |
|
|
|
10/23/2007 02:40:06 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by Pug-H:
There is a precedent.... Without Bugs or Flowers
(I would hope it would be without close-ups of eyes, too). ;-) |
Uh, right. Hence the request to "repeat" it. ;)
|
|
|
|
10/23/2007 02:43:01 AM · #17 |
How about food macro... :-D
Or NUDE macro?
|
|
|
|
10/23/2007 02:48:58 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by levyj413:
Originally posted by Pug-H:
There is a precedent.... Without Bugs or Flowers
(I would hope it would be without close-ups of eyes, too). ;-) |
Uh, right. Hence the request to "repeat" it. ;) |
Ah, but the request wasn't in the thread title for people who don't every single word in every single post. ;-) |
|
|
|
10/23/2007 02:39:12 PM · #19 |
never mind.
Message edited by author 2007-10-23 14:55:35.
|
|
|
|
10/23/2007 02:43:23 PM · #20 |
I'm for macros no matter what the limitations
this thing's heavy, but fun to use
 |
|
|
|
10/23/2007 04:26:13 PM · #21 |
I like that thing...how do you think it would work if you had "reflectors" of some sort in place of the actual flases on the sides?
Sort of a poor man's setup.
Originally posted by hopper:
I'm for macros no matter what the limitations
this thing's heavy, but fun to use
|
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/19/2025 07:48:13 PM EDT.
