| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/13/2007 12:04:26 PM · #26 |
|
|
|
10/13/2007 12:13:15 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by dsterner:
Ach du liebe!!! |
And, "Ach, Du meine Liebe!" |
|
|
|
10/13/2007 12:16:20 PM · #28 |
| Artistic is the rationalization that uppity people use to allow themselfs to look at porn. |
|
|
|
10/13/2007 12:43:13 PM · #29 |
Shouldn't that read "Ach, Du meine Liebe?" ...as in you are asking me...LOL I could be rusty though
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Originally posted by dsterner:
Ach du liebe!!! |
And, "Ach, Du meine Liebe!" |
|
|
|
|
10/13/2007 12:56:08 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by dsterner:
Shouldn't that read "Ach, Du meine Liebe?" ...as in you are asking me...LOL I could be rusty though
Originally posted by zeuszen:
Originally posted by dsterner:
Ach du liebe!!! |
And, "Ach, Du meine Liebe!" |
|
Common usage has it as an exclamation. I see no reason why one couldn't question one's surprise though. An alternate translation would be "Ach, Du meine Güte!" It's equally common.
(I think, the (thread-) hijacking is appropriate here, don't you?)
Message edited by author 2007-10-13 12:58:00. |
|
|
|
10/13/2007 01:03:14 PM · #31 |
| Elvis hat das Gebäude verlassen... |
|
|
|
10/13/2007 02:40:15 PM · #32 |
Sweet, I never knew I'd be getting a course in naughty Deutsch today :-)
|
|
|
|
10/13/2007 02:54:22 PM · #33 |
Pretty soom it 'll be domestic porn... Speaking of the dutch, I believe the Scientist quoted is...
You're kidding aren't you?
|
|
|
|
10/13/2007 03:03:02 PM · #34 |
Boudoir = domestic porn :-)
|
|
|
|
10/13/2007 03:13:44 PM · #35 |
| In a photography forum, how can this subject be seriously debated without photos? |
|
|
|
10/13/2007 04:01:39 PM · #36 |
|
|
|
10/13/2007 04:34:29 PM · #37 |
Originally posted by Dr.Confuser:
In a photography forum, how can this subject be seriously debated without photos? |
Now that is the best thought in this whole thread :-)
|
|
|
|
10/13/2007 05:47:03 PM · #38 |
Originally posted by Judi:
Originally posted by yanko:
1,399,103
That's the number of views in the nude gallery. That should tell you right there that there isn't a difference. The photographer and some art enthusiasts may appreciate artistic nudes for the art that they are but for most everyone else it's just porn lite, shadows and play on light be damned. |
And how many are yours??????????????????????
LOL!!
Let me guess...not as many as Leroy's? |
Hehe. Well, I was just stating there's not enough art enthusiasts on this site to account for the large number of views the gallery accumulates on a daily basis. If we did, they all seem to stay away when it comes to voting. |
|
|
|
10/13/2007 10:00:51 PM · #39 |
No one can vote multiple, but some men and most women can have multiple....
|
|
|
|
10/13/2007 10:13:29 PM · #40 |
//www.msnbc.msn.com/id/21271545/wid/11915829?GT1=10450
yea thats just what i want to do, having fun with a piece of cold metal. i bet you could get plugins for it, like detachable parts like a pocket******* or a ********on :) well keep this one clean:) |
|
|
|
10/14/2007 12:28:24 AM · #41 |
Spencer Tunick is supposed to be artistic, using nudes as his abstract form, from a bird's eye view. I don't think his works are porn at all.
The price of the resulting prints and the more lavish backgrounds, props, and lighting used.
The Artistic porn photo may tell a story, where as commercial porn is just physical action or display. Artists classify their porn as "Erotic Art", to different extremes. |
|
|
|
10/14/2007 09:22:40 AM · #42 |
This thread cracks me up!! :D
Artistic porn=anything that makes you say hmmmmmmmmm... interesting!!
Commercial porn=anything that makes you say hmmmmmmmmm... interesting!! I MUST have that product!!!
LOL
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/12/2025 01:26:57 PM EDT.
