Group Portrait Scores! - DPChallenge Forums

10/04/2007 01:16:18 PM · #26

My score has dropped almost a full tenth today... no cheerful voters around? Hmmmmm Hangin around 6.4ish :/

SandyP

Canon EOS-5D Mark IV

Canon EF 200mm f/2.8 USM

10/04/2007 01:52:48 PM · #27

Looks like the ribbon goes to scarbrd. I bet I know which one it is too. There's only a couple in my opinion that really stand out as clearly being at the top of the heap.

At 147 votes, I'm at: 6.5233

One of the middle-of-the-packers, but mine is clearly a portrait, not a candid snapshot.

Nikon AF-S Nikkor 28-300mm f3.5-5.6G ED VR

10/04/2007 03:59:09 PM · #28

Originally posted by SandyP:

I'm not so sure, there are some really strong entries in there.

Message edited by author 2007-10-04 15:59:40.

NikonJeb

Nikon D850

10/04/2007 04:38:01 PM · #29

Well.....I'm sure mine is being viewed as a snapshot, but one not too offensive. I really like it though, so I don't care how it scores. I've already framed it.

Group Portrait
Votes: 151
Views: 208
Avg Vote: 6.0596
Comments: 5
Favorites: 0

doc_gonzo

Nikon D300s

Nikon AF Nikkor 85mm f/1.8D

10/04/2007 05:40:08 PM · #30

I have a feeling mine is being viewed as a snapshot or candid as well though it is neither, merely an outdoor portrait that was very much planned and composed.

Judi

Canon EF 17-40mm f/4.0L USM

10/04/2007 05:44:31 PM · #31

Well I certainly haven't got

scarbrd's score...but I am certainly getting viewed....330 of them! Whatcha all lookin' at?

Message edited by author 2007-10-04 17:44:46.

10/04/2007 08:09:46 PM · #32

Meh... I have 398 views. ;-P

10/04/2007 09:03:15 PM · #33

Originally posted by scalvert:

Meh... I have 398 views. ;-P

And a good score to go with those views, I'll bet. ;-)

10/04/2007 09:14:01 PM · #34

Originally posted by scarbrd:

Originally posted by scalvert:
Meh... I have 398 views. ;-P

And a good score to go with those views, I'll bet. ;-)

Not too embarrassing. ;-)

(I'm a little giddy because I'm typing this on an iPod)

10/04/2007 09:17:09 PM · #35

Originally posted by scalvert:

Originally posted by scarbrd:

Originally posted by scalvert:
Meh... I have 398 views. ;-P

And a good score to go with those views, I'll bet. ;-)

Not too embarrassing. ;-)

(I'm a little giddy because I'm typing this on an iPod)

I'll bet you can't key in your score! ;-)

iPod Touch or iPhone?

Message edited by author 2007-10-04 21:18:09.

10/04/2007 09:17:37 PM · #36

Originally posted by scarbrd:

(I'm a little giddy because I'm typing this on an iPod)

I'll bet you can't key in your score! ;-)

iPod Touch ot iPhone? [/quote]

NERD! :P

360 views.

10/04/2007 09:30:36 PM · #37

Originally posted by scarbrd:

I'll bet you can't key in your score! ;-)

iPod Touch or iPhone?

iPod Touch, and no I can't... there's no chicken button. It just comes up as a X.XXXX. ;-D

Message edited by author 2007-10-04 23:12:57.

10/05/2007 12:54:16 PM · #38

I now have more votes in Group Portrait than in Free Study and Half combined.

200 votes and 387 views, lots of looky-loos! ;-)

10/05/2007 01:24:50 PM · #39

Originally posted by scarbrd:

I now have more votes in Group Portrait than in Free Study and Half combined.

200 votes and 387 views, lots of looky-loos! ;-)

Weird, the views just shot up to 479.

10/05/2007 01:26:27 PM · #40

Originally posted by scarbrd:

Originally posted by scarbrd:
I now have more votes in Group Portrait than in Free Study and Half combined.

200 votes and 387 views, lots of looky-loos! ;-)

Weird, the views just shot up to 479.

You shoot nudity, David? Hmmmmmmm

10/05/2007 01:27:41 PM · #41

Originally posted by idnic:

Originally posted by scarbrd:

Originally posted by scarbrd:
I now have more votes in Group Portrait than in Free Study and Half combined.

200 votes and 387 views, lots of looky-loos! ;-)

Weird, the views just shot up to 479.

You shoot nudity, David? Hmmmmmmm

Not this time. The views were at 387 at 200 votes, and 479 at 201 votes. All in a matter of 15 minutes or less.

10/05/2007 01:36:24 PM · #42

Originally posted by scarbrd:

Not this time. The views were at 387 at 200 votes, and 479 at 201 votes. All in a matter of 15 minutes or less.

Weird! Only thing I can think of is SC looking at it. Reviewing, perhaps?

10/05/2007 02:57:53 PM · #43

Originally posted by idnic:

Originally posted by scarbrd:
Not this time. The views were at 387 at 200 votes, and 479 at 201 votes. All in a matter of 15 minutes or less.

Weird! Only thing I can think of is SC looking at it. Reviewing, perhaps?

All 90 of them! That makes me feel better! ;-)

10/05/2007 04:01:27 PM · #44

Originally posted by scarbrd:

The views were at 387 at 200 votes, and 479 at 201 votes. All in a matter of 15 minutes or less.

Wow- you've got people doing double takes and triple takes! Either that or somebody's messing with your head. Nahhhh...

Message edited by author 2007-10-05 16:01:45.

10/05/2007 04:08:56 PM · #45

Originally posted by scalvert:

Originally posted by scarbrd:
The views were at 387 at 200 votes, and 479 at 201 votes. All in a matter of 15 minutes or less.

Wow- you've got people doing double takes and triple takes! Either that or somebody's messing with your head. Nahhhh...

STOP MESSING WITH MY HEAD!!!!! :-)

205 votes, 539 views. 4 more votes, 60 more views.

Judi