Originally posted by alanfreed:
I must say, I am indeed looking forward to hearing all of your rule suggestions where there is simultaneously zero subjectivity and 100% agreement amongst the masses... |
Well, me, too! ;) Note, though, that I didn't say it was always easy; I just think it's easy on this one point.
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by levyj413:
What's so wrong about putting "don't" things in the "you may not" category instead of backing into it in the "you may" category. |
If you read all the rules (as you confirm when you click the checkbox to submit), you would see the layer rules where they are now. Putting "don't" things in the "you may not category" would make reading those rules a much more daunting task indeed
..and so on until the rules are more than double their current length. :-/ |
Okay, I'll grant you that. Thanks, Shannon, for putting it in the larger context, that it's difficult to cover everything.
I'll stop bringing it up for a while, I guess. It just saddens me to see one person after another tripped up. Maybe you SC folks see people tripped up all the time on a million things, and have accepted you can't fix everything, whereas I just happen to notice this one.
|
