Author | Thread |
|
09/03/2007 01:53:46 PM · #1 |
Hi, everyone! I thought I'd check with all of you to get some feedback on this. I do alot of freelance work and have been asked to do some editing on shots taken by someone else for a high-end cake and dessert business to prepare them for both online viewing and print media. Normally, I would charge $85/hr. to both shoot and process. For just PP work, my thought was to charge $20/hr. - does this seem reasonable? I'm in the Baltimore/DC area. Any feedback from you all? Thanks! |
|
|
09/03/2007 01:58:06 PM · #2 |
i think you can charge by image edited, or something like that |
|
|
09/03/2007 01:59:58 PM · #3 |
Charging by image is an option. Any thought on a price per image? |
|
|
09/03/2007 02:22:59 PM · #4 |
$20 sounds too little to me. Charge $40 and expect to re-edit for no additional fee......you should also be good, and fairly fast too.
|
|
|
09/03/2007 02:25:23 PM · #5 |
it depends, how many images they got.
i friend of mine said: i charge 100 buks for PP per photo, he is no photographer, he is just a graphic designer.
maybe 50 per photo is ok... dont knoe really the think is that you have to make them espectacular
Message edited by author 2007-09-03 14:26:32. |
|
|
09/03/2007 02:28:27 PM · #6 |
charge per hour..... Ive seen ranges from 35 to 100 per hour
|
|
|
09/03/2007 03:08:03 PM · #7 |
Wow, guys.....looks like it's all over the place on this! |
|
|
09/03/2007 03:20:39 PM · #8 |
Way too many variables on this.
Is it basic editing? Is it fixing bad lighting / exposure? Is it for large prints or just smaller web-viewable shots? Is it special demands as per the customer? Is it restoration work?
I would think basic "tweaking" of an image to add some wow to it would fall under an umbrella of around $50 per image, with the other end of the spectrum being $100/hr with a cap of $300/image for custom work & restorations. |
|
|
09/03/2007 03:22:43 PM · #9 |
I would think charging by the type of editing would be an option.
Establish an editing system and charge accordingly.
Editing:
Level 1: Basic editing and cropping
Level 2: Includes level 1 plus extra editing techniques.
Level 3: Includes levels 1 & 2 plus plus extra editing techniques.
Level 4: Includes levels 1-2-3 plus extra editing techniques.
Level 5: Includes all levels plus the most advance techniques.
You can assign each level a certain amount of editing and charge per level of editing.
Level 1: $20.00
Level 2: $30.00
Level 3: $40.00
Level 4: $50.00
Level 5: $60.00
Just an example.
Message edited by author 2007-09-03 15:23:47. |
|
|
09/03/2007 04:08:53 PM · #10 |
for portraiture, i charge $40 flat rate for advanced editing - that means cleaning up severe acne, glamour shots with retouching etc. i'd say $40/hour is fair.
|
|
|
09/03/2007 05:13:13 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by swhiddon: I would think charging by the type of editing would be an option.
Establish an editing system and charge accordingly.
Editing:
Level 1: Basic editing and cropping
Level 2: Includes level 1 plus extra editing techniques.
Level 3: Includes levels 1 & 2 plus plus extra editing techniques.
Level 4: Includes levels 1-2-3 plus extra editing techniques.
Level 5: Includes all levels plus the most advance techniques.
You can assign each level a certain amount of editing and charge per level of editing.
Level 1: $20.00
Level 2: $30.00
Level 3: $40.00
Level 4: $50.00
Level 5: $60.00
Just an example. |
Can you be more specific about this? What would each level consist of in terms of the editing involved? |
|
|
09/03/2007 05:18:07 PM · #12 |
Originally posted by Brad: Way too many variables on this.
Is it basic editing? Is it fixing bad lighting / exposure? Is it for large prints or just smaller web-viewable shots? Is it special demands as per the customer? Is it restoration work?
I would think basic "tweaking" of an image to add some wow to it would fall under an umbrella of around $50 per image, with the other end of the spectrum being $100/hr with a cap of $300/image for custom work & restorations. |
It could be all of the above. My understanding at this point is that for right now I will be editing images for both web and some print advertising. I will also be doing some shooting for them at times. Hopefully I'll be able to get more specific information when I talk with them tomorrow. Another question I have is....if I shoot *for* them, do they then own the images and all copyrights or do I? If they use one of my shots for advertising, can I request a photo credit for it? Sheesh....so many things to consider... |
|
|
09/03/2007 05:19:17 PM · #13 |
Everyone's over-analyzing this. You charge as much as you can get without losing the customers business. There is no "one" price for everybody. |
|
|
09/03/2007 05:24:50 PM · #14 |
If you shoot and edit for $85/hour, why charge less to edit only. Your time is your time, no matter what you are doing.
|
|
|
09/03/2007 05:25:10 PM · #15 |
I would keep things simple and charge one rate for everything. Customers are just going to be confused with a multi-level pricing structure. They'll see your lower rate and wonder why they can't get that for what they need. Just tell them I charge x amount per hour and for your work I estimate 2 hours time or whatever time you think it will take. End of confusion.
Message edited by author 2007-09-03 17:26:02.
|
|
|
09/03/2007 05:31:54 PM · #16 |
All good points....thanks alot! |
|
|
09/03/2007 05:38:14 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever: If you shoot and edit for $85/hour, why charge less to edit only. Your time is your time, no matter what you are doing. |
I think this is an excellent point. I agree. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/05/2025 02:21:06 PM EDT.