| Author | Thread |
|
|
07/13/2007 02:22:18 AM · #1 |
I just ordered the Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro. I did it because I recently purchased the Canon EF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS and Its amazing!
I never thought I'd be willing to spend that kind of cash on a lens.
Now I want this one Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM AutoFocus Wide Angle. I NEED THIS LENS!! YOU CANT STOP ME!!!
|
|
|
|
07/13/2007 02:42:44 AM · #2 |
Originally posted by SouthCoastOr3gon: Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM AutoFocus Wide Angle. I NEED THIS LENS!! YOU CANT STOP ME!!! |
38mm isn't very wide.
|
|
|
|
07/13/2007 02:43:22 AM · #3 |
crack is probably cheaper, anyways...
and i was going to say something like on an xti, 24mm is 38mm which isnt really a great focal length to start a zoom at... but, i see that SouthCoastOr3gon has the 10-22 already, so the 24 will fill a pretty big gap in his lineup. spend away! you know you want to...
Message edited by author 2007-07-13 02:46:17. |
|
|
|
07/13/2007 02:55:35 AM · #4 |
That some great rationalizations, and justifications. The reviews I have read say the 10-22 shoots as good as the ultra wide angle L-series.
I live too far away from any camera shops to test it out for myself.
I think with th Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM AutoFocus Wide Angle lens my L-crack habit will be complete.
Message edited by author 2007-07-13 02:56:45. |
|
|
|
07/13/2007 03:42:33 AM · #5 |
You appear to be going for a similar lens set up to me. The 10-22 is superb (just check what Bear_Music does with his). I love my 24-105, but do sometimes wish I had gone for the faster 24-70. I now have the 100m macro so similar there. The 100-400 is next on my shopping list (for sometime next year) so it is great to hear good feedback.
If you have to choose between the 24-105 and the 10-22 then go for the 24-105 - it covers 80% of my shooting scenarios. |
|
|
|
07/13/2007 06:06:50 AM · #6 |
Is L-glass more addictive than crack?
Not sure..how is your crack habit coming along?
I had the 10-22 with my 20D and I actually really miss it (sold it with my 20D when I bought my 5D), n absolutly superb lens.
Message edited by author 2007-07-13 06:07:09. |
|
|
|
07/13/2007 06:36:31 AM · #7 |
I have to have that 10-22mm ... mine, mine! next on my shopping list!
|
|
|
|
07/13/2007 06:39:48 AM · #8 |
I just bought the 70-200mm 2.8 IS L series lens and I have got to tell you that is like living in a dream when shooting with this lens. I like so many others am now also hooked on L glass.
I think my next purchase will be the 1.4x tele converter, then the 10-22mm. I am trying to hold out a bit on the 10-22mm because I have heard rumors of canon releasing one with a 2.8 apreture in October at photokina, hopefully its not way out of the realm of possibility. I guess I will sit back and see.
Rich
Edit for Sigma comment, as I couldnt find info to back it up.
Message edited by author 2007-07-13 07:07:29. |
|
|
|
07/13/2007 06:54:43 AM · #9 |
hmmm...are you sure? now you make me think twice about that 10-22mm
but then again, sigma is not that wide, right?
Message edited by author 2007-07-13 06:59:05.
|
|
|
|
07/13/2007 07:08:51 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by anotherday: hmmm...are you sure? now you make me think twice about that 10-22mm
but then again, sigma is not that wide, right? |
Couldnt find the information to back up my mouth, I have seen it somewheres and I will continue to look, but for now I will correct my statement as not to mislead anyone until I have crediable data.
Rich |
|
|
|
07/13/2007 07:17:07 AM · #11 |
here is a fun place to look at
|
|
|
|
07/13/2007 07:21:33 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by anotherday: here is a fun place to look at |
Looks like Fun! Thanks for sharing. |
|
|
|
07/14/2007 11:01:45 PM · #13 |
I did it!
The UPS guy will be bringing both lenses next week, and photoshop Cs3!
w00t!!!!
Now Im feeling unsatisfied with my Xti.....hmmmmm
|
|
|
|
07/14/2007 11:34:32 PM · #14 |
I agree that 24mm is not wide on a crop-sensor. When I had the 24-105 on the 300D I really missed the 17-24mm portion of the 17-40mm I had sold to buy it.
If you want wide, I'd go with the 17-40 which is cheaper anyway. If you want walkaround, the 24-105 is excellent. |
|
|
|
07/20/2007 02:47:17 AM · #15 |
My red rings arrived today. They are so sleek, and sexy!
My wife got the packing slip :/ She is irate!! I'm gonna sleep on the couch tonight!
There would be a similar reaction if I was caught smoking crack. There are some similarities between crack and L-glass.
I'll have to buy her something expensive to calm her down.
I cant wait to shoot tomorrow!!!
|
|
|
|
07/20/2007 03:01:55 AM · #16 |
| I just tried to install photoshop, and my dvd drive wont work. Always something :( |
|
|
|
07/20/2007 05:14:03 AM · #17 |
I quit doing crack so I could afford L-glass, yes L-glass is much more addictive :)...Enjoy your new lenses SouthCoastOregon
Best Regard, Nathan |
|
|
|
07/20/2007 07:19:31 AM · #18 |
Originally posted by SouthCoastOr3gon: I just ordered the Canon EF 180mm f3.5L Macro. |
yeah i have that one too, and it quickly became my favorite lens :)
good choice |
|
|
|
07/20/2007 07:39:15 AM · #19 |
| Congrats on your addiction. Now you just have to buy her some nice glass to go on her finger, ears, or neck. That should keep her quiet, for a little while anyways. ;-) Nice macro of the bird's eye btw. |
|
|
|
07/20/2007 08:02:24 AM · #20 |
|
|
|
07/20/2007 10:02:46 AM · #21 |
Originally posted by SouthCoastOr3gon:
My wife got the packing slip :/ She is irate!! I'm gonna sleep on the couch tonight!
There would be a similar reaction if I was caught smoking crack. There are some similarities between crack and L-glass.
I'll have to buy her something expensive to calm her down.
|
And this is why I'm glad I don't shoot Canon... :-P |
|
|
|
07/20/2007 10:09:53 AM · #22 |
Originally posted by SouthCoastOr3gon: I think with th Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM AutoFocus Wide Angle lens my L-crack habit will be complete. |
It'll never be complete and you know it too. You know you want a 500mm f/4L IS... I just got my first L and I want another already. 17-40mm f/4L is the leader right now with a potential of dumping the 70-200mm f/4L and upgrading to the f/2.8L (non-IS since I can't afford $1700).
|
|
|
|
07/20/2007 11:27:10 AM · #23 |
Originally posted by SamDoe1: Originally posted by SouthCoastOr3gon: I think with th Canon EF 24-105mm f/4L IS USM AutoFocus Wide Angle lens my L-crack habit will be complete. |
It'll never be complete and you know it too. You know you want a 500mm f/4L IS... I just got my first L and I want another already. 17-40mm f/4L is the leader right now with a potential of dumping the 70-200mm f/4L and upgrading to the f/2.8L (non-IS since I can't afford $1700). |
My prediction is he'll be jonesing for a 5D next. :-D |
|
|
|
07/20/2007 12:34:23 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by Strikeslip: Originally posted by SamDoe1: It'll never be complete and you know it too. You know you want a 500mm f/4L IS... I just got my first L and I want another already. 17-40mm f/4L is the leader right now with a potential of dumping the 70-200mm f/4L and upgrading to the f/2.8L (non-IS since I can't afford $1700). |
My prediction is he'll be jonesing for a 5D next. :-D |
I know I am...
...must...resist...temptation...bank account would not be happy.
The new "40D" looks very tempting too but I think the 350D is going to be good for a while.
|
|
|
|
07/20/2007 12:37:37 PM · #25 |
Crack? Bah. The real question is, is it more addictive than Facebook?
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 12/31/2025 09:28:57 AM EST.