| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/12/2003 04:29:37 AM · #1 |
I saw a wierd photo that looked like 2 different images of the same thing that were combined to form one photo somehow. Is this sort of thing legal for a DPC challenge?
EDIT: What if it was an edited version on top of the original?
Message edited by author 2003-08-12 04:30:51. |
|
|
|
08/12/2003 05:34:29 AM · #2 |
Adjustment layers (levels, curves, etc.) are okay, but I don't think the type of layers you're talking about are.
Suggest you request a DQ (voting as if it is legal) and let the admmins sort it out.
|
|
|
|
08/12/2003 05:37:25 AM · #3 |
I didnt see it here but was wondring if it was legal to try?
Message edited by author 2003-08-12 05:38:45. |
|
|
|
08/12/2003 06:34:19 AM · #4 |
Ah right.
I don't think it's legal under normal DPC rules. The rule that springs to mind is the one that says you can't adjust transparency on a layer - something I expect you would have to do for this to work.
|
|
|
|
08/12/2003 06:37:15 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by bod:
Ah right.
I don't think it's legal under normal DPC rules. The rule that springs to mind is the one that says you can't adjust transparency on a layer - something I expect you would have to do for this to work. |
Bod, you had me worried there... the rules don't say that anywhere. |
|
|
|
08/12/2003 06:40:41 AM · #6 |
| i have another thread about splitting channels. If i split the colour channels and say resize 1 and recombine them without adjusting transparancy is it legal? |
|
|
|
08/12/2003 06:45:13 AM · #7 |
Originally posted by BLEE:
i have another thread about splitting channels. If i split the colour channels and say resize 1 and recombine them without adjusting transparancy is it legal? |
I think that the rules can be interpreted a number of ways sometimes, and allow for a small degree of interpretation, but this seems against the spirit of what is normally acceptable here IMO.
I don't know about splitting channels, but it's splitting hairs!
Message edited by author 2003-08-12 06:45:52. |
|
|
|
08/12/2003 06:47:17 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by BobsterLobster:
Originally posted by bod:
Ah right.
I don't think it's legal under normal DPC rules. The rule that springs to mind is the one that says you can't adjust transparency on a layer - something I expect you would have to do for this to work. |
Bod, you had me worried there... the rules don't say that anywhere. |
Layers: Only adjustment layers may be used, and the layer must be applied in normal mode. All other types of layers and all other blending methods (modes) are prohibited. Layers may not be used to apply a prohibited effect to an image.
You're right. Maybe the rules used to (pre DPC2) say no transparency adjustments, or maybe I dreamed it! : )
It does say only adjustment layers though.
Brendon - your new question is beyond me! I'll let someone with more photoshop know how answer that one.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/28/2025 06:02:12 PM EDT.
