Author | Thread |
|
06/27/2007 02:33:51 PM · #1 |
Hi everybody. I have a couple of quick questions.
I got a call from her grandmother asking for me to print a "poster sized, black and white print" of her individual gymnastics pic. (This is just a downloaded thumb...full-size is at home on my PC)
I don't have the image on my work computer, but have some specs. The image size is 2304x3456, but I will want to crop a little bit.
Can I crop this at home, upload it onto Mpix (where I do most of my printing) and have a decent poster? Will they upsize or anything, or will it print at like 100 dpi? Should I try uping the ppi and resample and all that? Also is 20x30 considered "poster size", or is 16x20, 16x24, 20x24 ok?
Thanks so much!
-drew |
|
|
06/27/2007 02:40:30 PM · #2 |
After cropping, you'll want to do some upsizing in PS. Make sure you use bicubic smoothing when resizing. Best practice used to be to upsize in 10% increments, but I don't know that this is necessary anymore. There is also some excellent dedicated software that does a good upsampling job, but I can't remember the name just now... |
|
|
06/27/2007 02:44:17 PM · #3 |
You could rasterbate .
//homokaasu.org/rasterbator/
Message edited by author 2007-06-27 14:44:33.
|
|
|
06/27/2007 02:50:11 PM · #4 |
Originally posted by strangeghost: After cropping, you'll want to do some upsizing in PS. Make sure you use bicubic smoothing when resizing. Best practice used to be to upsize in 10% increments, but I don't know that this is necessary anymore. There is also some excellent dedicated software that does a good upsampling job, but I can't remember the name just now... |
Thanks for the responses. I think I read somewhere that 10% was needed prior to Photoshop CS. I am using PS7 at home. I also thought I read that if you upload the full sized image to Mpix, they would do inhouse upsizing to get you to 20x30 at a decent dpi. Has anyone else heard this?
-drew |
|
|
06/27/2007 03:07:02 PM · #5 |
Genuine Fractals is what I was trying to think of. |
|
|
06/27/2007 03:39:30 PM · #6 |
You can't create detail out of thin air, despite what you see on TV, but at least a poster isn't usually meant to be pixel (dot?) peeped. Sizing it to 300dpi at the print size can't hurt, though. I wouldn't worry about the increment thing, but you can try it and see if it really makes any difference... |
|
|
06/27/2007 03:57:28 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by MadMan2k: You can't create detail out of thin air |
The thumb I posted is just a sample to show how much I would want to crop from the picture. Like I said, the full sized image is 2304x3456, but at 20x30" that is 115.2 dpi. I guess I was more looking to see if people took shots from their 8MP cameras, did NOT upsize, loaded them onto a print site and got decent posters from them. |
|
|
06/28/2007 12:57:05 PM · #8 |
Ok so I upsized last night in 10% steps from 100 dpi to 300 dpi and it looks pretty good. I am going to use DPCPrints and upsize again tonight to somewhere around 175-200, load and print. Thanks everybody for all your suggestions.
-drew
edit: I also figured up poster sizes and ratios. For those who care, an actual movie poster is 27x41 close to a 2:3 ratio. Similar sized/proportioned prints are 16x24, 20x30, and 24x36. A little shorter and fatter are 18x24 and 30x40 with 3:4 ratios, farther still are the 16x20 and 20x24 with ~4:5. So the bolded ones will look more proportioned like an actual poster, just pick your size.
Message edited by author 2007-06-28 13:01:50. |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/30/2025 03:53:05 AM EDT.