| Author | Thread |
|
|
06/25/2007 01:46:33 AM · #26 |
Originally posted by hotpasta:
Originally posted by mpeters:
Enzo,
I think I found yours... |
:-) great work Mark |
Oooooh, now I wanna play "Find Enzo"... I mean, "Waldo"! |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 02:08:00 AM · #27 |
Votes: 15
Views: 28
Avg Vote: 5.4667 |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 02:32:34 AM · #28 |
Votes: 20
Views: 41
Avg Vote: 5.6500
Comments: 3
Favorites: 0
I breathe again...when I woke up it was 5.1 at 15 votes. Hopefully it will climb from this point on - at least it's safely away from the border line of 5....Thought it was a 6 image at least and I haven't felt that strongly about an image in a while. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 02:52:37 AM · #29 |
Nice start, Enzo - and a nice comment from you, too.
Votes: 22
Views: 46
Avg Vote: 6.6364
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 06/25/07 02:46 am
|
|
|
|
06/25/2007 02:58:28 AM · #30 |
| Just got a 5 because the person can't find Waldo. Try harder people, he's there. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 03:03:24 AM · #31 |
Votes: 17
Views: 30
Avg Vote: 4.7059
Comments: 1
The person who gave me a comment couldn't find the person in my photo :( In fact there are two persons there! |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 03:15:04 AM · #32 |
ouch!
dropped from 6.5500 to
Votes: 23
Views: 40
Avg Vote: 6.4783
Comments: 5
|
|
|
|
06/25/2007 04:31:54 AM · #33 |
Votes: 25
Views: 40
Avg Vote: 6.7600
Comments: 5
|
|
|
|
06/25/2007 05:26:28 AM · #34 |
Originally posted by Monicagd:
The person who gave me a comment couldn't find the person in my photo :( In fact there are two persons there! |
So far the comments I've got have been critical that there may be more than one person in the image! |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 05:30:15 AM · #35 |
Originally posted by Judi:
4.000 |
Wasn't me. I haven't started voting yet. :P |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 06:01:25 AM · #36 |
what's happening...
it keeps dropping..
Votes: 29
Views: 55
Avg Vote: 6.3448
Comments: 6
hope it's bounching back.
obvious wrong..not obvious wrong..
one waldo wrong..more waldos wrong..
easy to find wrong..not easy to find also wrong..
now..what's right..?..
mmmmm..i need coffee...
Message edited by author 2007-06-25 06:14:39. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 06:11:00 AM · #37 |
| I think 'not able to find Waldo'should not be a reason to vote low. Its more to do with a voters lack of time and focus rather than the person who submitted it. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 06:21:01 AM · #38 |
| For the 2nd time people: Waldo is there, it's not missing just try to look harder. I thought the purpose of this challenge was to HIDE a person in a person-less environment, so it's annoying to get low votes just because you don't see him or you don't have time to look. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 06:38:27 AM · #39 |
Votes: 29
Views: 47
Avg Vote: 5.1034
Very disappointed, really thought this image would score higher
Message edited by author 2007-06-25 06:38:42. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 06:56:33 AM · #40 |
Originally posted by manish:
I think 'not able to find Waldo'should not be a reason to vote low. Its more to do with a voters lack of time and focus rather than the person who submitted it. |
I agree manish you shouldn't vote low> This contest is hide and seek |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:00:57 AM · #41 |
I ...can't....stop...the ...update...has me ...in it's... evil grasp!!
On a more observational note it's nice to see a challenge where flowers don't feature in the majority of entries. Don't get me wrong flowers are good to look at and all - but there must come a point where even your favourite bloom doesn't quite meet the needs of a challenge. Does anyone know of a Waldo/Wally Rose?:)
Anyway my progress thus far:
Votes: 38
Views: 86
Avg Vote: 5.2105
Comments: 5
Message edited by author 2007-06-25 08:16:39. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:02:07 AM · #42 |
Votes: 35
Views: 61
Avg Vote: 5.0286
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
|
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:22:05 AM · #43 |
Votes: 39
Views: 66
Avg Vote: 6.2821
Comments: 1
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 06/25/07 08:19 am |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:34:15 AM · #44 |
Votes: 39
Views: 62
Avg Vote: 5.8718
Comments: 2
Favorites: 0
|
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:45:54 AM · #45 |
| The point was to make waldo hidden, not make him the size of a grain of salt in a desert. I haven't given a vote below a 6 but some of these are rediculous. Magnifying glass anyone?? |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:50:07 AM · #46 |
I have my reading glasses on and I still see certain images without a hidden person. I better get out a magnifying glass. ;~p
|
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:51:56 AM · #47 |
| I see some images where there is simply no person visible. If I need to spend more that a couple minutes trying to find them, I'll move on and not vote or comment on that image. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:52:35 AM · #48 |
oh well..
mine is kept dropping...
Votes: 38
Views: 74
Avg Vote: 6.1579
Comments: 9
still hoping it's bouching back...
guess no need to update now. |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:58:31 AM · #49 |
Originally posted by LanceW:
I see some images where there is simply no person visible. If I need to spend more that a couple minutes trying to find them, I'll move on and not vote or comment on that image. |
Dito!! |
|
|
|
06/25/2007 08:58:54 AM · #50 |
Originally posted by Jutilda:
I have my reading glasses on and I still see certain images without a hidden person. I better get out a magnifying glass. ;~p |
I thought it was just me! |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/18/2025 06:35:32 PM EDT.
