Author | Thread |
|
06/06/2007 02:15:30 PM · #926 |
so happy...here's PWL....
Votes: 38
Views: 60
Avg Vote: 5.6579
Comments: 1
bsolutely unbelievable score for me. Definitely gonna be a new homepge pic! |
|
|
06/06/2007 02:48:31 PM · #927 |
My Why photo has taken a dive.
Why
Votes: 36
Views: 48
Avg Vote: 6.0556
Comments: 1
|
|
|
06/06/2007 03:05:18 PM · #928 |
WHY - My first vote was an 8 with a comment. I was SO excited. I'm still pretty happy with the score.
Votes: 39
Views: 72
Avg Vote: 5.3590
Comments: 5
|
|
|
06/06/2007 03:12:27 PM · #929 |
My "why" started below 4 :/
Votes: 32
Views: 43
Avg Vote: 4.9063
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
By the way, my double take is at about the same (at 5.1), but I might get a "no comments" award for it if it keeps up as is for a few more days.
Best of luck to everyone!
Rob |
|
|
06/06/2007 03:46:10 PM · #930 |
I thought I'd enter a double pluss goofy pwl as I haven't actually had anything on the left side for a couple of weeks. It's running at an unsurprising 4 point not very many and oh, yeah, someone who doesn't think the sc has enough to do has demanded validation. |
|
|
06/06/2007 03:50:59 PM · #931 |
Originally posted by rheverly: My "why" started below 4 :/
Votes: 32
Views: 43
Avg Vote: 4.9063
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
By the way, my double take is at about the same (at 5.1), but I might get a "no comments" award for it if it keeps up as is for a few more days.
Best of luck to everyone!
Rob |
Sheesh, dont' brag about getting "no comments" here or someone will go through and comment on everyone's picture.
|
|
|
06/06/2007 04:44:49 PM · #932 |
Originally posted by meyers: Originally posted by rheverly: By the way, my double take is at about the same (at 5.1), but I might get a "no comments" award for it if it keeps up as is for a few more days.
Rob |
Sheesh, dont' brag about getting "no comments" here or someone will go through and comment on everyone's picture. |
That was certainly not my intent . . . *wanders away, whistling and trying not to look at anyone*
:)
Rob |
|
|
06/06/2007 04:46:23 PM · #933 |
Actually if you happen to pass through a challenge without comments you will be awarded a "special" sucker. |
|
|
06/06/2007 04:48:55 PM · #934 |
Originally posted by raish: I thought I'd enter a double pluss goofy pwl as I haven't actually had anything on the left side for a couple of weeks. It's running at an unsurprising 4 point not very many and oh, yeah, someone who doesn't think the sc has enough to do has demanded validation. |
I think you may win for most validation requests... |
|
|
06/06/2007 04:53:42 PM · #935 |
Originally posted by quiet_observation: Actually if you happen to pass through a challenge without comments you will be awarded a "special" sucker. |
Hey I'm quite sure I hd at lest one challenge where I had no comments until fter challenge - I thinkit ws Circles.
5.73ish for PWL...please don't let it end!!!
edit: yes I'm right, have one comment only, made by kashi AFTER chllenge. Ironiclly the ic, candies in the round, is of...suckers. LOL!
Message edited by author 2007-06-06 16:56:52. |
|
|
06/06/2007 04:56:05 PM · #936 |
Feel free to post on your profile page if you've survived a challenge with no comments. The gif was created for me by Ken (Art), who's been very absent of late, and I miss his witty banter. :-(
Go on that score, Susan! |
|
|
06/06/2007 04:57:59 PM · #937 |
Thanks Deb, LOL! Or should I say...LOLlipop? :-) |
|
|
06/06/2007 04:59:04 PM · #938 |
Not gonna happen in double take; I just got a comment (not from a TSer).
Funny world, aye?
Thanks anyway, Deb; maybe my "why" shot will continue to unimpress :)
Rob |
|
|
06/06/2007 05:07:41 PM · #939 |
WHY CHALLENGE started at 6.333, and stayed in the 6's for three hour. now
Votes: 3
Views: 6
Avg Vote: 6.3333
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Hit 6.4 After 10/6 and then a 2
Votes: 7
Views: 11
Avg Vote: 5.7143
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
This is Total rubbish voting...
Votes: 27
Views: 39
Avg Vote: 5.0000
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Votes: 39
Views: 55
Avg Vote: 4.8718
Comments: 0
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Really can't understand this.
|
|
|
06/06/2007 05:13:27 PM · #940 |
Maybe I'm thick as two planks but I cn't recall seeing any entries or posts from Svetlana recently. From looking at a forum on her homepage someone stole photo of hers (not a TSer obviously). nyone heard from hr? |
|
|
06/06/2007 05:16:03 PM · #941 |
I have been wondering for a while....what is team suck?? they seem like so much fun!!
~~~watching from the sidelines~~~
|
|
|
06/06/2007 05:19:05 PM · #942 |
Welcome stranger!
Go to first page of thread, read, then PM posthumous for the dreaded initiation ceremony. Once you join a team you get my brownie recipe.
Then shoot pix and hve fun! |
|
|
06/06/2007 06:18:44 PM · #943 |
Help!
I uploaded a file for dpc prints and it says
18 x 24 Glossy Print (33 DPI)
18 x 24 Matte Print (33 DPI)
30 x 40 Glossy Print (20 DPI)
30 x 40 Matte Print (20 DPI)
But the SAME file in photoshop says
width 800
height 600
resolution 300 pixels/inch
Anyone have a simple answer that my mentally-blocked brain can understand? I know there's the tutorial but I have not been successful with understanding that so far.
Thanks. |
|
|
06/06/2007 06:25:28 PM · #944 |
Originally posted by snaffles: Maybe I'm thick as two planks but I cn't recall seeing any entries or posts from Svetlana recently. From looking at a forum on her homepage someone stole photo of hers (not a TSer obviously). nyone heard from hr? |
She is entering challenges and posting in the forum.
Message edited by author 2007-06-06 18:25:45. |
|
|
06/06/2007 06:28:52 PM · #945 |
Originally posted by klstover: Help!
I uploaded a file for dpc prints and it says
18 x 24 Glossy Print (33 DPI)
18 x 24 Matte Print (33 DPI)
30 x 40 Glossy Print (20 DPI)
30 x 40 Matte Print (20 DPI)
But the SAME file in photoshop says
width 800
height 600
resolution 300 pixels/inch
Anyone have a simple answer that my mentally-blocked brain can understand? I know there's the tutorial but I have not been successful with understanding that so far.
Thanks. |
800 pixels at 300 pixels per inch is 2.666 inches
600 pixels at 300 pixels per inch is 2 inches
ANything larger than that will reduce the pixels/inch
|
|
|
06/06/2007 06:32:36 PM · #946 |
Oooh. I don't have everything perfect in my head but this is a HUGE step for me actually understanding this.
Thank you. |
|
|
06/06/2007 06:35:10 PM · #947 |
Originally posted by klstover: Help!
I uploaded a file for dpc prints and it says
18 x 24 Glossy Print (33 DPI)
18 x 24 Matte Print (33 DPI)
30 x 40 Glossy Print (20 DPI)
30 x 40 Matte Print (20 DPI)
But the SAME file in photoshop says
width 800
height 600
resolution 300 pixels/inch
Anyone have a simple answer that my mentally-blocked brain can understand? I know there's the tutorial but I have not been successful with understanding that so far.
Thanks. |
I'm no expert here but my understanding of this is...300 pixels/inch is just that 300 per inch so your original at 300 dpi would measure 2 2/3 inchs by 2 inchs so at 800 divided by 24 equal 33dpi and 800 divided by 40 equal 20 dpi, you only have 800 x 600 pixels the larger the print size the smaller the dpi...to go 18 x 24 you would need a file that is 5400 x 7200 pixels to equal 300 dpi, Make sense ???
edit to add...Opps too late!!! LOL
Message edited by author 2007-06-06 18:35:53.
|
|
|
06/06/2007 07:05:59 PM · #948 |
That helps too, thank you :-) |
|
|
06/06/2007 07:16:03 PM · #949 |
Originally posted by Melethia:
Feel free to post on your profile page if you've survived a challenge with no comments. The gif was created for me by Ken (Art), who's been very absent of late, and I miss his witty banter. :-(
Go on that score, Susan! |
I bet he could make some much nicer Team Suck ribbons than what I cobbled together. If only the forum code could be extended to allow a caption under a thumbnail (like on the front page results)..
|
|
|
06/06/2007 07:52:32 PM · #950 |
Originally posted by klstover: 18 x 24 Glossy Print (33 DPI)
18 x 24 Matte Print (33 DPI)
30 x 40 Glossy Print (20 DPI)
30 x 40 Matte Print (20 DPI) |
notice that 30 X 20 = 600
and 40 X 20 = 800
this is NOT a coincidence.
(just trying to show it to you from a different angle. sometimes that helps with this math stuff) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/24/2025 03:15:39 AM EDT.