| Author | Thread |
|
|
04/25/2007 02:06:20 PM · #1 |
I was a little surprised to see this image DQ'd for "added text":
Only text I can see is the time/date stamp, which the camera placed on the image. I was always under the impression that this is not "adding text" since it is a part of the original file straight from the camera?
R.
|
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:07:27 PM · #2 |
Ah, nevermind
Message edited by author 2007-04-25 14:07:49. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:07:42 PM · #3 |
| That does seem odd... I will investigate! Thanks for bringing it to our attention. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:07:44 PM · #4 |
Hmmmm.... there's an interesting one for debate!
I must say I agree with you Robert.
|
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:09:47 PM · #5 |
| My guess would be the wrong explanation for the DQ. If the time stamp is correct, it's a date/time violation as the picture was taken before the challenge was announced. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:09:50 PM · #6 |
| Nobody agrees with you. Anything "In Camera" is supposed to be legal. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:11:44 PM · #7 |
As far as I can remember date stamps were always disqualified.
|
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:12:31 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Azrifel:
As far as I can remember date stamps were always disqualified. |
Nope, I asked about it once and was told that since it was done in camera it would not be DQ'ed.
|
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:12:56 PM · #9 |
| freakin-hilarious got it right.. date violation was the real reason. Just a clerical error. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:18:06 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by frisca:
freakin-hilarious got it right.. date violation was the real reason. Just a clerical error. |
Thats pretty bad that the date is ON the image and they submitted it..... damn man! |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:18:31 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by Nobody:
Nobody agrees with you. Anything "In Camera" is supposed to be legal. |
Lol except multiple exposure........ |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:24:07 PM · #12 |
ETA: see it was already defined why the photo was dq'ed.
Message edited by author 2007-04-25 14:27:05. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:26:37 PM · #13 |
Originally posted by swhiddon:
Look at the date on the image. It's 3/29/2007, which means the picture was taken before the submission date. The photograph was taken out of the dates allowed. The announcement date of the challenge was not until 4/11/2007 |
ur purdy smart |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:26:47 PM · #14 |
| Pity. That was my favorite in the challenge and was totally heading for a ribbon. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:28:11 PM · #15 |
Originally posted by Art Roflmao:
Pity. That was my favorite in the challenge and was totally heading for a ribbon. |
You have very discerning taste. :)
|
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:30:09 PM · #16 |
hmm.. so the dq is counted in her average score received.. didn't know that..
|
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:34:12 PM · #17 |
Originally posted by UrfaTheGreat:
hmm.. so the dq is counted in her average score received.. didn't know that.. |
That was brought up in another thread a while ago and it is something I do not agree with at all.
|
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:43:15 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by frisca:
freakin-hilarious got it right.. date violation was the real reason. Just a clerical error. |
Date violations are cause for a DQ?
Not always |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:47:29 PM · #19 |
Originally posted by Brad:
Originally posted by frisca:
freakin-hilarious got it right.. date violation was the real reason. Just a clerical error. |
Date violations are cause for a DQ?
Not always |
We don't go back and retroactively DQ images where we had no way to know or investigate the dates at the time of the challenge or a reasonable time thereafter. So yes, images probably DO stay in challenges even though the are out of date. Put simply, we start with the honour system and hope people read and abide by rules, and we have a more or less random check/reasonable suspicion system to monitor and enforce the date rule. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:54:44 PM · #20 |
Originally posted by frisca:
We don't go back and retroactively DQ images where we had no way to know or investigate the dates at the time of the challenge or a reasonable time thereafter. So yes, images probably DO stay in challenges even though the are out of date. Put simply, we start with the honour system and hope people read and abide by rules, and we have a more or less random check/reasonable suspicion system to monitor and enforce the date rule. |
Of course no statement on DPC is ever 100% true... :)
DQ'd from the Landscape II challenge two months later... |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 02:58:00 PM · #21 |
Originally posted by Brad:
Originally posted by frisca:
freakin-hilarious got it right.. date violation was the real reason. Just a clerical error. |
Date violations are cause for a DQ?
Not always |
That was back in the day when cheaters prospered. ;-) |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 03:00:43 PM · #22 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
Originally posted by frisca:
We don't go back and retroactively DQ images where we had no way to know or investigate the dates at the time of the challenge or a reasonable time thereafter. So yes, images probably DO stay in challenges even though the are out of date. Put simply, we start with the honour system and hope people read and abide by rules, and we have a more or less random check/reasonable suspicion system to monitor and enforce the date rule. |
Of course no statement on DPC is ever 100% true... :)
DQ'd from the Landscape II challenge two months later... |
I see nothing to indicate when that photo was DQ'd, but thanks for the super supportive post! I suppose "reasonable time" is a fixed number in your mind. |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 03:02:26 PM · #23 |
Welcome to DPC Bee! Better luck next time buddy. Perhaps a quick flick through the rules and such may be beneficial ;-) |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 03:02:30 PM · #24 |
Originally posted by frisca:
Originally posted by DrAchoo:
Originally posted by frisca:
We don't go back and retroactively DQ images where we had no way to know or investigate the dates at the time of the challenge or a reasonable time thereafter. So yes, images probably DO stay in challenges even though the are out of date. Put simply, we start with the honour system and hope people read and abide by rules, and we have a more or less random check/reasonable suspicion system to monitor and enforce the date rule. |
Of course no statement on DPC is ever 100% true... :)
DQ'd from the Landscape II challenge two months later... |
I see nothing to indicate when that photo was DQ'd, but thanks for the super supportive post! I suppose "reasonable time" is a fixed number in your mind. |
That one was DQ'd because of EXIF tampering. That was the beginning of the "Cheaters Don't Actually Prosper" era. :) |
|
|
|
04/25/2007 03:03:17 PM · #25 |
Originally posted by UrfaTheGreat:
hmm.. so the dq is counted in her average score received.. didn't know that.. |
Is it? Or is that her current challenge showing up in real time?
p.s. you should never violate your date unless they're into that kinda thing |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 10/14/2025 11:58:01 AM EDT.
