Author | Thread |
|
04/19/2007 05:17:01 PM · #1 |
what is with that little hook thing on all these lenses...is it to hok it onto a belt for a temporary period while switching lenses or something?
EXAMPLE:
 |
|
|
04/19/2007 05:17:53 PM · #2 |
It is the tripod collar. With a lens that big you mount the lens to the tripod not the camera. |
|
|
04/19/2007 05:19:27 PM · #3 |
ohhh i see cause its so front heavy...i get it now. thnaks |
|
|
04/19/2007 05:34:31 PM · #4 |
On my Nikon 80-200 lens, it also has a SUPER use.
By mounting on the collar you can rotate on-the-same-axis of the lens from Landscape to Portrait! It is very fast and convenient. |
|
|
04/19/2007 06:54:10 PM · #5 |
On the Sigma 80-400 (and probably some others, too), it doubles as a nice, comfortable carrying handle for the whole camera/lens combination. Quite convenient, really.
|
|
|
04/19/2007 07:00:32 PM · #6 |
can you take it off ..personally it is useless weight if youre not useing a tripod and also it looks kind of cool and hightec if you leave it on to someone who doesnt know what a dslr is exactly but to me it is indof stupid looking... |
|
|
04/19/2007 07:06:15 PM · #7 |
Originally posted by Jib: can you take it off ..personally it is useless weight if youre not useing a tripod and also it looks kind of cool and hightec if you leave it on to someone who doesnt know what a dslr is exactly but to me it is indof stupid looking... |
One can certainly remove the tripod collar, although I find that, with a 70-200 it is useful even when hand-holding. I find that the base of the collar sits right in my palm at, or near, the point of balance and I can operate the zoom ring easily with finger and thumb, while supporting the lens with my palm. To be completely accurate, though, I haven't tried it without the collar.
|
|
|
04/19/2007 07:25:15 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by Jib: can you take it off ..personally it is useless weight if youre not useing a tripod and also it looks kind of cool and hightec if you leave it on to someone who doesnt know what a dslr is exactly but to me it is indof stupid looking... |
What's a couple ounces when you've got a lens heavy enough to need one? |
|
|
04/19/2007 08:19:03 PM · #9 |
You can take it off, but mine stays on the 70-200 all the time. Why? Well, besides the hassle of keeping tack of it, and re-mounting it when i sant to use a tripod, it *does* make a nice pocket hook! I sling the camera strap over my shoulder, put the tripod collar "foot" in my back jeans pocket and voila! No weight on the strap. I can walk all day that way. |
|
|
04/19/2007 08:20:24 PM · #10 |
lol i actually do use the collar to hold it from my pocket sometimes... not the safest thing though. |
|
|
04/19/2007 08:22:53 PM · #11 |
i thought of maybe making some sort of thing that attatchesto ti then making a belt with like built in female things that take thee male attatchment and making it so it has a protector for the lens itsllelf...i might have another invention here...hmmm |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/17/2025 12:18:23 AM EDT.