| Author | Thread | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:19:13 AM · #1 | 
		| | Scores Please 
 Votes: 	4
 Views:	8
 Avg Vote:	5.2500
 Comments:	1
 Favorites:	0
 Wish Lists:	0
 Updated: 	04/02/07 12:17 am
 
 Vote 1 = 8
 Vote 2 = 5
 Vote 3 = 3
 Vote 4 = 5
 
 Message edited by author 2007-04-02 00:19:57.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:20:31 AM · #2 | 
		| | Il settle for a mid 5 on this shot. 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:20:44 AM · #3 | 
		| | What a cruddy start: 
 Votes: 3
 Views: 9
 Avg Vote: 4.3333
 Comments: 0
 Favorites: 0
 Wish Lists: 0
 Updated: 04/02/07 12:18 am
 
 I'm starting to feel a little bitter with all the sub 5 scores on my front page.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:22:36 AM · #4 | 
		| | forgot to put scores in the title will open ticket
 
 Votes: 	5
 Views:	9
 Avg Vote:	5.2000
 Comments:	1
 Favorites:	0
 Wish Lists:	0
 Updated: 	04/02/07 12:21 am
 
 Vote 5 = 5
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:22:52 AM · #5 | 
		| | Votes: 6 Views: 11
 Avg Vote: 4.6667
 Comments: 0
 Favorites: 0
 Wish Lists: 0
 Updated: 04/02/07 12:21 am
 
 Well, I am not on Team Suck for nothing :-)
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:24:23 AM · #6 | 
		| | man some nice person just gave me a 1 or 2 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:24:41 AM · #7 | 
		| | Votes: 	8 Views:	12
 Avg Vote:	4.8750
 Comments:	2
 Favorites:	0
 Wish Lists:	0
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:24:55 AM · #8 | 
		| | Thank You site council for fixing the title. 
 Im officially stupid!
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:29:40 AM · #9 | 
		| | Votes: 	7 Views:	11
 Avg Vote:	5.5714
 Comments:	0
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 12:35:44 AM · #10 | 
		| | Votes: 	9 Views:	18
 Avg Vote:	6.3333
 Comments:	1
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 01:50:13 AM · #11 | 
		| | Votes: 17 Views: 29
 Avg Vote: 4.7647
 
 I knew i shouldnt have entered..... :(
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 02:07:23 AM · #12 | 
		| | | Originally posted by WriteHeart: Votes: 6
 Views: 11
 Avg Vote: 4.6667
 Comments: 0
 Favorites: 0
 Wish Lists: 0
 Updated: 04/02/07 12:21 am
 
 Well, I am not on Team Suck for nothing :-)
 | 
 
 Awesome, babe. That's my kind of score! :-D  LOL.
 Seeing that smile at the end of your post makes me happy you've joined us.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 02:34:28 AM · #13 | 
		| | Votes: 16 Views: 37
 Avg Vote: 5.5625
 Comments: 1
 Favorites: 0
 Wish Lists: 0
 Updated: 04/02/07 02:32 am
 Status: Thank you for submitting your proof file. Your submission is being reviewed by the administrators and is pending further action.
 
 Woo hoo! My first submission review! Okay, I have no idea why I am excited but I am. I know I have nothing to fear so I guess I am almost flattered someone had to stop and ask the question: "How did he/she do that?"
 
 lol..on second thought. Maybe I better reread the rules to make SURE I am not stepping out of bounds. Anyways...
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 04:45:06 AM · #14 | 
		| | Votes: 25 Views: 39
 Avg Vote: 4.8000
 Comments: 0
 Favorites: 0
 Wish Lists: 0
 Updated: 04/02/07 04:39 am
 
 woo hoo..looks like a race for last place!! lol
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 06:06:40 AM · #15 | 
		| | | Originally posted by riversong: 
 woo hoo..looks like a race for last place!! lol
 | 
 
 I'm in the race
 
 Votes:	25
 Views:	56
 Avg Vote:	4.8800
 Comments:	0
 Favorites:	0
 Wish Lists:	0
 Updated:	04/02/07 06:04 am
 
 and I thought 1st of April was over
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 06:24:22 AM · #16 | 
		| | Votes: 	28 Views:	58
 Avg Vote:	6.7857
 Comments:	6
 Favorites:	1
 Wish Lists:	1
 
 The wish list is a bit over the top cause I know I don't think I would really want this hangin in my house, but who am I to complain. (But then if Deb is reading this post then she knows exactly who I am to complain - 1783).
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 07:08:43 AM · #17 | 
		| | Timfy, Timfy, Timfy.  When will you learn??  What did I tell you?? 
 Sigh.  (Good creep on that there score.)
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 09:07:42 AM · #18 | 
		| | Votes: 39 Views: 66
 Avg Vote: 4.3846
 Comments: 5
 Favorites: 1
 Wish Lists: 1
 
 Seems to be getting mixed reviews.
 
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 10:26:55 AM · #19 | 
		| | How do you score a photo where the photographer evidently misunderstood the meaning of anachronism? | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 10:28:05 AM · #20 | 
		| | | Originally posted by citymars: How do you score a photo where the photographer evidently misunderstood the meaning of anachronism?
 | 
 
 Don't vote on the picture.
 
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 10:29:40 AM · #21 | 
		| | I am very pleased with my score and the comments are all very nice but it seems some people aren't getting thing anachronism. I know what it means, and I thought mine to be clear but I guess I didn't spell it out enough. 
 To me all of the comparison photos are not an anachronism. I don't know. Is that too harsh on my voting? I think puting something new and something old next to eachother is not the same as something misplaced in time. And that is the bulk of the photographs.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 10:38:49 AM · #22 | 
		| | Just a hair over 4.0. 
 Mine is one of the comparisons - and a poorly done one at that.  I forgot about this challenge until 9pm last night !
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 10:55:41 AM · #23 | 
		| | | Originally posted by escapetooz: I am very pleased with my score and the comments are all very nice but it seems some people aren't getting thing anachronism. I know what it means, and I thought mine to be clear but I guess I didn't spell it out enough.
 
 To me all of the comparison photos are not an anachronism. I don't know. Is that too harsh on my voting? I think puting something new and something old next to eachother is not the same as something misplaced in time. And that is the bulk of the photographs.
 | 
 
 I don't agree.  If one of the items is clearly the intended anachronism, it's fine.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 11:10:10 AM · #24 | 
		| | | Originally posted by skewsme: 
 | Originally posted by escapetooz: I am very pleased with my score and the comments are all very nice but it seems some people aren't getting thing anachronism. I know what it means, and I thought mine to be clear but I guess I didn't spell it out enough.
 
 To me all of the comparison photos are not an anachronism. I don't know. Is that too harsh on my voting? I think puting something new and something old next to eachother is not the same as something misplaced in time. And that is the bulk of the photographs.
 | 
 
 I don't agree.  If one of the items is clearly the intended anachronism, it's fine.
 | 
 
 But if there is something old and something new next to eachother on a plain background... then which really is the intended anachronism? There is no setting to give perspective.
 | 
 | 
		
			|  | 04/02/2007 11:13:45 AM · #25 | 
		| | Fresh out of retirement...Avg Vote: 5.4259 
 I just looked at the entries and now I understand why my score is so low. I foolishly met the Challenge. Pretty big pile of DNMC's...or simple missunderstandings of the word to plow through.
 
 I'll admit that my anachronism could have had a greater context but it's beyond clear that my subject is out of a different time and place.
 
 Just an opinion but I don't see this Challenge as a set-up type of thing. IMHO there are maybe 6-7 that meet the Challenge.
 
 Message edited by author 2007-04-02 11:23:52.
 | 
 | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 10/31/2025 05:46:45 PM EDT.