Saturday's wedding - DPChallenge Forums

03/02/2007 12:25:51 PM · #26

Originally posted by GoldBerry:

All these shots are technically very well done! This just confirms that I need a new (better) lens!

Your 28-105 has a nice range... but you'll really like the sharpness of the 24-70 2.8L. Plus, Canon's cameras focus faster/more accurately with a 2.8 lens.

So go ahead.... everybody's doin' it! :-)

dwterry

Canon EOS-1D Mark III

03/02/2007 12:32:41 PM · #27

By the way, if anyone cares to look around at the "rest" of the images (instead of just the few that I picked out to post here on DPC), you can find the couple's online portfolio here.

I had three cameras running. My daughter

cassilda_terry took the Getting Ready pictures, and both she and Skyler

skylercall helped out with the wedding.

My website will show you the EXIF data at the bottom of the images (after you click to view the larger image).

Quick legend: Photos ending with 'A' were taken by me, photos ending with 'B' were taken by Cassie using the 20D during the wedding (later, by me for candids), and photos with a 'C' were taken by Skyler.

leaf

Canon EOS-5D Mark II

03/02/2007 12:50:38 PM · #28

thanks for the link.
Great that you have the exif info.. that will be interesting to see how you shoot.

<-- headed off to look and scrutinize all your photos and check out their exif info.

03/02/2007 12:54:57 PM · #29

a series of good photos - too sharp i would say though. not sure if that's a lightroom full res resized or resized and sharpened more.

the people seem to look like mannequins in the few posted to the thread.

Tamron SP AF 24-135mm f/3.5-5.6 AD Aspherical IF for Canon

03/02/2007 12:59:49 PM · #30

Originally posted by soup:

Oh, boy. Our taste radically disagrees here, matey.

03/02/2007 01:15:45 PM · #31

is that a first?

that's fine, but doesn't mean i can't state mine...

my comment had nothing to do with the photos themselves - and i thought i pointed that out. i was, however, curious how the sharpening was applied...

Originally posted by nards656:

Oh, boy. Our taste radically disagrees here, matey.

03/02/2007 01:20:27 PM · #32

this one stood out as un-flattering to me.

Telehubbie

Canon EOS-40D

03/02/2007 02:52:20 PM · #33

Great shots (as usual) Terry! I'm sure they are more than happy with them. Thanks for posting! I'll check out the Lightroom, sounds nice.

Tamron SP AF 24-135mm f/3.5-5.6 AD Aspherical IF for Canon

03/02/2007 03:46:43 PM · #34

Originally posted by soup:

this one stood out as un-flattering to me.

It looked like he lost a little control of the excellent lighting on that one, indeed.

Originally posted by soup:

is that a first?

that's fine, but doesn't mean i can't state mine...

I have no idea, I don't keep score on who I agree with, normally :) You're welcome to state your opinion; my expression was given in a little bit of shock that something I thought was REALLY good would be drastically less than that to someone else. I guess that's why my average score is barely over a 5, huh?? Nothing personal intended, be cool :)

Spork99

OM System OM-1

Canon EF 100mm f/2.8 USM Macro

03/02/2007 03:53:30 PM · #35

David, as always, a first class job.

cassilda_terry

03/02/2007 03:57:22 PM · #36

the lighting would be my fault, since i was holding the flash in the air.... so that settles it.

Tamron SP AF 24-135mm f/3.5-5.6 AD Aspherical IF for Canon

03/02/2007 04:00:15 PM · #37

Originally posted by cassilda_terry:

the lighting would be my fault, since i was holding the flash in the air.... so that settles it.

Sorry, it's just not as good as the rest of them :(

03/02/2007 04:20:25 PM · #38

will do ! ;}

i got my car stuck in a gulley next to the driveway this morning and it took me 3 hours to get it out. i was only 1/3 of the way to the end, and had already snow blowed. maybe i am a tad cranky. sorry....

Originally posted by nards656:

not sure it's the lighting, anyhow i'll just shut up...