| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 07:02:46 PM · #1			 | 
		
		| I am going to africa soon and I am looking for a telephoto zoom lense for the safari's I will be going on.  I am currently looking at the sigma 70-300.  I was curious of what you thought of that? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 07:17:37 PM · #2			 | 
		
		Don't forget to cover your wide end for landscapes.
 
   |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 07:23:29 PM · #3			 | 
		
		I used a 17-40 and a 100-400 in Africa, mostly the 100-400.  Instead of the 17-40, my 28-135 would have been a better choice for the wide end.
 
 300 to 400 is the bare minimum when shooting the animals.  But, as Eugene mentioned, don't forget a wide angle lens for the amazing landscapes. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 07:28:04 PM · #4			 | 
		
		| This Sigma would be awesome for a safari, but might cost more than the whole trip. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 07:32:13 PM · #5			 | 
		
		| the Sigma 50-500 would server you well and is only $1,000 |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 07:32:27 PM · #6			 | 
		
		With a FF this lens may be better.
 
 This wld be the bare minimum for wildlife on a FF, while still somewhat affordable.
 
 Previous posters used cameras with a 1.6 crop. There is, of course, nothing to multiply with the 1D. 400mm is 400mm is 400mm.
  Message edited by author 2007-01-31 19:38:16. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 07:40:19 PM · #7			 | 
		
		It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400 or Sigmas, but certainly check it out - it's a good way to incrase range and versitility of a lens at lower cost.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 07:48:29 PM · #8			 | 
		
		Originally posted by OdysseyF22:   It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400... |   
 
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 08:15:55 PM · #9			 | 
		
		Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by OdysseyF22:   It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400... |   
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.  |   
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 08:38:17 PM · #10			 | 
		
		Originally posted by _eug:   Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by OdysseyF22:   It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400... |   
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.  |   
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.  |   
 
 With the Canon EF 100-400mm? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 08:39:09 PM · #11			 | 
		
		Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by _eug:   Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by OdysseyF22:   It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400... |   
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.  |   
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.  |   
 
 With the Canon EF 100-400mm?  |   
 
 Eugene shoots Nikon. ;oP |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 08:45:33 PM · #12			 | 
		
		Originally posted by cpanaioti:   Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by _eug:   Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by OdysseyF22:   It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400... |   
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.  |   
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.  |   
 
 With the Canon EF 100-400mm?  |   
 
 Eugene shoots Nikon. ;oP  |   
 
 Well, ok. On second thought, if his subjects are cooperative and fairly stationary, he might have something of a chance. I'd find this lens near impossible to manually focus a moving subject. And I imagine that a moving subject is what we want to take pictures of, every now and then. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 08:47:48 PM · #13			 | 
		
		Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by cpanaioti:   Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by _eug:   Originally posted by zeuszen:   Originally posted by OdysseyF22:   It might be worth looking into a teleconverter to go with a telephoto lens.  I'm not sure if they work with the Canon 100-400... |   
 He'd have to sacrifice auto-focus. Can't do without auto-focus photographing wildlife.  |   
 While I'd agree with this for dast moving wildlife. I disagree that autofocus is necessary. There were time I should have shot manual and got the focus dead on faster. I missed a few shots due to slow AF.  |   
 
 With the Canon EF 100-400mm?  |   
 
 Eugene shoots Nikon. ;oP  |   
 
 Well, ok. On second thought, if his subjects are cooperative and fairly stationary, he might have something of a chance. I'd find this lens near impossible to manually focus a moving subject. And I imagine that a moving subject is what we want to take pictures of, every now and then.  |   
 
 You're right about trying to manually focus the 100-400 on a moving subject. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
01/31/2007 09:21:17 PM · #14			 | 
		
		I say the 100-400 is minimal for wildlife and anything works for landscapes. I like my 24-70mm.
 If you can afford a 500 or 600mm or can rent one they would be great too. I would not use it with a TC too much loss of contrast and quality |  
  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/04/2025 08:09:32 AM EST.