Author | Thread |
|
01/30/2007 02:21:29 PM · #51 |
Originally posted by karmat: Yea. Then, I may be able to break 5 consistently after, oh 25 years or so. |
Exactly what I was thinking! (About my scores, not yours.) |
|
|
01/30/2007 02:24:17 PM · #52 |
Originally posted by idnic: Can we get this thread title changed? Something like "Shannon Scalvert, Disqualified for Rulebreaking" Then more people could benefit from the entertainment, I mean education it offers. ;)
edit spelling |
|
|
|
01/30/2007 02:26:37 PM · #53 |
Originally posted by karmat:
|
You know you wanna ;-)
|
|
|
01/30/2007 02:34:45 PM · #54 |
Originally posted by karmat: Originally posted by idnic: Can we get this thread title changed? Something like "Shannon Scalvert, Disqualified for Rulebreaking" Then more people could benefit from the entertainment, I mean education it offers. ;) |
|
DO IT! DO IT! DO IT! DO IT! |
|
|
01/30/2007 02:41:30 PM · #55 |
Y'all are being a little hard on poor Shannon, don't you think? To tell you the truth, the "resize once" thing didn't even register when I read the rules until I saw this thread. I do recall a lot of discussion of how many time you could sharpen but nothing about resizing.
Sorry about the DQ, Shannon, but you seem to have made a whole lot of people downright giddy, so I suppose that's a plus in an odd sort of way....
P.S. Deb's method for minimal editing rules:
1) Copy file (actually, I may have forgotten this part but I have the original RAW file!)
2) Open
3) Resize to maximum allowable pixel size on long side
4) Save
I just skipped the sharpening part altogether. :-) |
|
|
01/30/2007 02:42:44 PM · #56 |
I'm just teasing Shannon, Deb. No harm meant. :)
|
|
|
01/30/2007 02:46:56 PM · #57 |
Oh, I know that. I suppose I neglected my "giggling behind my hand while typing" smilie thingie... I have no idea what that looks like. |
|
|
01/30/2007 02:49:26 PM · #58 |
Originally posted by Melethia: Oh, I know that. I suppose I neglected my "giggling behind my hand while typing" smilie thingie... I have no idea what that looks like. |
Here ya go... lol

|
|
|
01/30/2007 02:53:35 PM · #59 |
Dang Shannon, that's gotta suck. I was trying to think of a smartass remark for you, but there's nothing I can say that Cindi hasn't said already. :-) |
|
|
01/30/2007 02:56:21 PM · #60 |
Originally posted by Telehubbie: Dang Shannon, that's gotta suck. I was trying to think of a smartass remark for you, but there's nothing I can say that Cindi hasn't said already. :-) |
You could call him a doofus, I didn't call him a doofus! 
|
|
|
01/30/2007 02:56:33 PM · #61 |
Well, to err is human. At least we finally know the truth. Shannon is indeed human! |
|
|
01/30/2007 02:59:40 PM · #62 |
Originally posted by idnic:
You could call him a doofus, I didn't call him a doofus! |
LOL, yet!
|
|
|
01/30/2007 03:03:48 PM · #63 |
|
|
01/30/2007 03:05:36 PM · #64 |
Originally posted by idnic: You could call him a doofus, I didn't call him a doofus! |
Didn't I already do that? |
|
|
01/30/2007 03:07:58 PM · #65 |
|
|
01/30/2007 03:09:29 PM · #66 |
Originally posted by karmat: |
lol oops! :)
|
|
|
01/30/2007 03:10:22 PM · #67 |
Originally posted by scalvert: I'm a doofus. |
Yes, but it bears repeating. :)
|
|
|
01/30/2007 03:15:55 PM · #68 |
Oops, just got back to this thread... Shannon, you're a doofus!
Ah, there, that's better. :-) Thanks Cindi! |
|
|
01/30/2007 03:21:44 PM · #69 |
Doofus is kind...this was the alternative...

Message edited by author 2007-01-30 15:21:53.
|
|
|
01/30/2007 03:22:09 PM · #70 |
In the words of Carlos Mencia, the funniest beaner* of all time, "Dee-Dee-Dee!"
*Just watch his show and you'll know he's proud to be a beaner. Don't shoot the messenger.
Message edited by author 2007-01-30 15:25:15. |
|
|
01/30/2007 03:24:56 PM · #71 |
You need to be careful now or you will get banned next time you try and cheat.... YO HO HO & A BOTTLE O RUM!
|
|
|
01/30/2007 03:27:49 PM · #72 |
Originally posted by Melethia: Y'all are being a little hard on poor Shannon, don't you think? To tell you the truth, the "resize once" thing didn't even register when I read the rules until I saw this thread. I do recall a lot of discussion of how many time you could sharpen but nothing about resizing.
Sorry about the DQ, Shannon, but you seem to have made a whole lot of people downright giddy, so I suppose that's a plus in an odd sort of way....
P.S. Deb's method for minimal editing rules:
1) Copy file (actually, I may have forgotten this part but I have the original RAW file!)
2) Open
3) Resize to maximum allowable pixel size on long side
4) Save
I just skipped the sharpening part altogether. :-) |
You were supposed to shoot it in jpeg right? RAW was not allowed. WAS IT??!!
Jojo |
|
|
01/30/2007 03:29:08 PM · #73 |
Originally posted by TCGuru:
You were supposed to shoot it in jpeg right? RAW was not allowed. WAS IT??!!
Jojo |
My camera can be set to shoot both RAW and jpeg. That's the way I always have it set as it is. The shot I entered is indeed the jpeg. |
|
|
01/30/2007 03:29:38 PM · #74 |
Originally posted by TCGuru:
You were supposed to shoot it in jpeg right? RAW was not allowed. WAS IT??!!
|
Ruh roh...
Edit; Nevermind the ruh roh
Message edited by author 2007-01-30 15:30:05.
|
|
|
01/30/2007 03:31:12 PM · #75 |
Originally posted by Melethia: Originally posted by TCGuru:
You were supposed to shoot it in jpeg right? RAW was not allowed. WAS IT??!!
Jojo |
My camera can be set to shoot both RAW and jpeg. That's the way I always have it set as it is. The shot I entered is indeed the jpeg. |
WHEW! I was about to be jeaaaallllous LOLOL |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/13/2025 11:42:26 AM EDT.