Author | Thread |
|
06/18/2003 09:41:58 AM · #26 |
Well mine is fairly recognizable, I think that everyone's taking my comments out on my face. lol It's a self portrait, I did every last drop of it - but it's over-creative, and thus sitting at 5.35
|
|
|
06/18/2003 09:44:25 AM · #27 |
This is my first submission and it's fun to wait for the points. Although I'm only hovering slightly above 5 right now *laugh* Thought I would get a bit more points, but hey, what the heck. Perhaps my idea wasn't expressed very clearly or in the best way. This site's for learning too :o)
And of course, not everybody can have taste ;o)
Message edited by author 2003-06-18 09:46:30. |
|
|
06/18/2003 09:58:48 AM · #28 |
I am VERY impressed with all the creativity in this challenge... I wish this would happen more! |
|
|
06/18/2003 10:21:34 AM · #29 |
I agree photogirl, this has been a very fun challenge to vote on. There's some AMAZING shots here, and I stand by my original post, EVERYONE here is "good lookin'". I'm hangin' on to a 5 with my fingernails too, you guys. but I'm still having fun!
|
|
|
06/18/2003 10:24:52 AM · #30 |
Well I'm about to go vote and I'm in the 5 to 10 club, so...
G'luck!
|
|
|
06/18/2003 10:28:58 AM · #31 |
I have to keep reminding myself that I'm voting for DPC, and not the "AmIHotOrNot.com" site :) |
|
|
06/18/2003 10:42:10 AM · #32 |
i'm being generous with my votes. no less than 6 for any brave self-portraiting soul.
i'm also heartened by the fact that some people who i KNOW are good looking at getting not stratospheric scores either.
|
|
|
06/18/2003 10:54:54 AM · #33 |
I'm with mag, especially since I myself uploaded a poorly edited self portrait (noticed it too late, couldn't fix it! :( )
This challenge just isn't about photographic talent as much as it is photographing the talent. :) When I vote...nothing below a 5 for sure! |
|
|
06/18/2003 11:10:31 AM · #34 |
4.xxxx isn't very encouraging, but I am the one at fault. I actually though that a lot more people would use the same approach (however I saw only 1 or 2 photos using a similar method - can't tell you what exactly since my score is low enough considering we are in the first few hours of voting). I did something that has been done ... quite a few times.
If this were a social event, we would not be here discussing how high or low someone scored ... life is a beauty contest and now is payback time! 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ... JK Somehow I feel that people that didn't submit should not have they votes counted or have them counted 50% ... but then I am just bitter at my 4.xxxx. This thing does great things for someone's self esteem, HAHAHAHAHAHA :D |
|
|
06/18/2003 11:16:17 AM · #35 |
hey check this out //www.bestfoto.com/Archives/POTDresultsDate.asp
you can find it on cast votes page 2 the same pic. how does it count regarding dpc rules - Exposure Date: Your photograph must be taken within the submission dates for the challenge unless otherwise specified in the 'extra rules' section of the challenge.
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:20:16 AM · #36 |
Yeah Alex, I'm feelin' like some ugly duck right now or a really poor photographer or a combination thereof. I'm currently hovering around 4.8 in this challenge. Lucky people are easin' up on the voting....ROFL The upside is my off-center image is doing extremely well.....sorta bitter sweet ;)
Owen
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:22:48 AM · #37 |
Originally posted by Tiberius: hey check this out //www.bestfoto.com/Archives/POTDresultsDate.asp
you can find it on cast votes page 2 the same pic. how does it count regarding dpc rules - Exposure Date: Your photograph must be taken within the submission dates for the challenge unless otherwise specified in the 'extra rules' section of the challenge. |
Looks like someone pulled real quick or the syntax was incorrect.
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:22:52 AM · #38 |
Originally posted by Tiberius: hey check this out //www.bestfoto.com/Archives/POTDresultsDate.asp
you can find it on cast votes page 2 the same pic. how does it count regarding dpc rules - Exposure Date: Your photograph must be taken within the submission dates for the challenge unless otherwise specified in the 'extra rules' section of the challenge. |
The .asp link doesn't work. Tell us another way to get there - what could we search for in the archives?
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:31:32 AM · #39 |
//www.bestfoto.com/Archives/POTDresultsCategory.asp
or try //www.bestfoto.com click on winners archive select category: people year: 2003 month: 5 it is on 24th of may |
|
|
06/18/2003 11:33:54 AM · #40 |
Well, hovering at a sub-5 level myself, I'm really looking forward to the votes of the generous folks posting to this thread! 8-) |
|
|
06/18/2003 11:33:54 AM · #41 |
Originally posted by orussell: Yeah Alex, I'm feelin' like some ugly duck right now or a really poor photographer or a combination thereof. I'm currently hovering around 4.8 in this challenge. Lucky people are easin' up on the voting....ROFL The upside is my off-center image is doing extremely well.....sorta bitter sweet ;)
Owen |
Well I just *barely* made into the 5-10 camp! I can't wait to see the results of this challege, unfortunatelly no comments though :( |
|
|
06/18/2003 11:35:02 AM · #42 |
Originally posted by Tiberius: //www.bestfoto.com/Archives/POTDresultsCategory.asp
or try //www.bestfoto.com click on winners archive select category: people year: 2003 month: 5 it is on 24th of may |
//www.bestfoto.com/Archives/POTDdisplay.asp?PIC=052403P%2Ejpg
Got it - definitely outside challenge dates.
Message edited by author 2003-06-18 11:35:25.
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:38:48 AM · #43 |
His first entry. Another victim of not realising that the shot has to be taken within the submission dates I expect :-/
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:39:19 AM · #44 |
Yeah - I removed my DQ request. If anyone else feels compelled, go ahead, but I'd rather send him a PM.
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:39:49 AM · #45 |
By my personal rules, if it fits the challenge and there are no big glaring flaws (but no real points of interest or other upticks), it gets a 5. This is still true in this challenge. :-> People who didn't, imho, take a self-portrait (and by that I mean 'there is no human anywhere in the shot', not 'Did someone else hit the shutter button for them?!?'), are getting a bit lower from me. People whose shot has, to me, flaws, but it's a valid self-portrait, are getting maybe a 3 or 4 (depending on how bad the technical flaw is).
However, well over two-thirds of the votes I'm giving out are 5 or above. Just because, gee, people are FITTING THE CHALLENGE TOPIC on this one. :->
Message edited by author 2003-06-18 11:43:40.
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:41:23 AM · #46 |
Yeah but how can you tell? Mine was done by myself, but it could easily fall into the "someone else pushed the button" category. lol
M
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:44:31 AM · #47 |
Originally posted by mavrik: Yeah but how can you tell? Mine was done by myself, but it could easily fall into the "someone else pushed the button" category. |
That's why I'm not using that metric as a way to say 'Man, that's not fitting the topic!!!'. :-> So far I haven't seen anything that couldn't have been gotten with mirrors, cable release, timers, etc.
|
|
|
06/18/2003 11:49:24 AM · #48 |
|
|
06/18/2003 12:10:57 PM · #49 |
I'm at 4.3 which is actually above what I expected.
What I wanted to try and show was something personal and different. I had a message - not all of us are models or have perfect bodies but, and here's the thing, some of us size 22 mamas are actually happy with our bodies any way.
So I entered something I know will be quite unattractive to many people and will offend a great many.
I already got a comment suggesting it was skin for skin's sake (that's as much as I will say, although given that so many entries aren't anonymous because of the nature of this challenge, I don't think it's such a big deal for once) but that really missed the point I was trying to make.
So what I really want are comments to let me know whether the low scores are because people
don't like the skin
don't like the technical aspects - lighting, grain, focus
don't like the colour treatment
don't like the composition
or something else
or all of the above
BUT I really don't think that one should get down or feel bad about themselves if their photo scores low. It's the image itself being judged not us as people - don't allow yourself to confuse the two.
That's what I think anyway.
I nearly chickened out of my entry but I decided in the end that I had a particular idea I wanted to achieve and that I could learn more from it (given comments) than I could from the very boring but perfectly adequate straight portrait shot I was going to enter.
|
|
|
06/18/2003 12:13:50 PM · #50 |
You go girl! I tried very hard to cover as much of my less-than-model-material body as possible, and that was a trick. I'm proud of you for being brave!
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 01:22:02 AM EDT.