DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Infrared and flash
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 3 of 3, (reverse)
AuthorThread
01/26/2007 01:39:17 PM · #1
Finally got an infrared filter the other day, and have been experimenting with lighting with it. Outside direct sunlight, exposures are monstrous, which is kind of fun:

The second shot is 14 minutes at f/1.8, iso 800! The difference is about 16 stops of light.

I was quite curious to see how normal flashes would perform in infrared though, having read that xenon tubes do produce quite a large amount of IR.
<-- control shot at iso100, f/11, flashes at 1/128th power.
<-- the same shot in infrared, bumped all three flashes to full power and still had to open up to f/1.8 at iso3200 to get a readable image.

The flashes are a difference of 7 stops each, 5 1/3 stops at the lens, and 5 stops of ISO... 18 1/3 stops of light is lost to the filter with the xenon tubes, which is a noticeable bit more than the diffuse-daylight example above (that's 1/262144th of the light that gets through without the filter!). Takes a bit too much power to be practical, but perhaps infrared lightpainting with flash is a viable option to experiment with.

Wondering if anybody else here has had experience with infrared and artificial lightsources?
01/26/2007 01:47:17 PM · #2
Infrared filter and an infrared camera will produce two very different results.
01/26/2007 01:52:31 PM · #3
I haven't done much with flashes with IR digital, but I used to do quite a lot with IR film.

I had an Olympus XA that I covered the flash with an IR filter (Kodak 87C gel) and loaded the camera with Kodak High Speed Infrared (no filter on camera). It could then take flash exposures in complete darkness without anyone knowing you were taking pictures, and no I won't tell you where my favorite place was to use it ;-). I still have a Vivitar 283 with an IR gel glued on the flash head somewhere. I haven't thought of a good reason to experiment with digital. Light painting I'd use a tungsten flashlight or something like that for probably more IR than you would get out of a flash. I could be mistaken, but I think Nikon made an ultra IR sensitive flash based on I think the SB-14 (could have been UV instead). Of course even it they did finding one would be a real chore.

Anyway I'm curious with your ongoing research so please post more.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/02/2026 06:13:13 PM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/02/2026 06:13:13 PM EST.