| Author | Thread |
|
|
01/06/2007 01:49:12 PM · #1 |
Here's one that I literally inherited with a bunch of my Dad's stuff. It was made by Schneider Optics, some time prior to 1967... much prior, since my Dad had it since then, and it was removed from some piece of industrial gear. It's actually not marked as built by Schneider, all I have is my Dad's notes to that effect.
It has a 24-inch (609mm) focal length, at f/5.6. It has a diaphragm that allows it to be stopped down to f/8; it's marked to f/11, but there is a mechanical stop that limits it to f/8, and I really don't want to dissassemble it to figure out how to remove the stop.
For size comparison, the lens next to it is the Canon 50/1.4. The front element of this beast is over 100mm across. The rear element is about 75mm across, and it projects an image circle about 200mm in diameter (!!) There is an internal lens group that moves and apparently adjusts the magnification slightly. I suspect this monster was used in reproduction equipment.
I'm sure this thing will prove useful, I just haven't figured out quite how yet ;-) |
|
|
|
01/06/2007 01:57:21 PM · #2 |
|
|
|
01/06/2007 01:57:40 PM · #3 |
Yah, that's a reprographics lens I think. Hence the magnification adjustment. Aperture is limited because it's designed to be used on a flat field where DOF is not an issue, but crispness is.
R.
|
|
|
|
01/06/2007 02:00:30 PM · #4 |
Yeh Robert, the thing that tipped me off to the repro use was the 1:1 marking. Dead giveaway. It's one *massive* piece of glass & metal, weighs in at 6 pounds.
Edit: The flat field properties of the lens just might make it useful as an objective for a fast, moderate focal length telescope.
Message edited by author 2007-01-06 14:03:10. |
|
|
|
01/06/2007 02:09:05 PM · #5 |
Originally posted by kirbic: Yeh Robert, the thing that tipped me off to the repro use was the 1:1 marking. Dead giveaway. It's one *massive* piece of glass & metal, weighs in at 6 pounds.
Edit: The flat field properties of the lens just might make it useful as an objective for a fast, moderate focal length telescope. |
Could you just put the monster on one end of some PVC, and hook the 50mm up on the other as an eyepiece? I imagine this question reveals how limited my knowledge of optics really is.
|
|
|
|
01/06/2007 02:20:59 PM · #6 |
Originally posted by wavelength:
Could you just put the monster on one end of some PVC, and hook the 50mm up on the other as an eyepiece? I imagine this question reveals how limited my knowledge of optics really is. |
That's sorta my plan as a first test. I will use a telescope eyepiece, but the PVC tube is pretty much where I'm going with it. I'll actually need two tubes so it's focusable, but that should't be hard to rig up. |
|
|
|
01/06/2007 02:35:03 PM · #7 |
| Cool. You should build a view camera body to put it on and use a flatbed scanner for a scanning back to make digital files :p |
|
|
|
01/06/2007 02:36:13 PM · #8 |
Originally posted by kirbic: Originally posted by wavelength:
Could you just put the monster on one end of some PVC, and hook the 50mm up on the other as an eyepiece? I imagine this question reveals how limited my knowledge of optics really is. |
That's sorta my plan as a first test. I will use a telescope eyepiece, but the PVC tube is pretty much where I'm going with it. I'll actually need two tubes so it's focusable, but that should't be hard to rig up. |
I'd like to see that, I've seen some of these in a shop up in Weston, MO. Morts Camera Collection or something. He also sells litographs of old tin-type photographs of vaudeville performers that his great uncle used to take. Would be a cool project with my 7yo daughter, who wants to be an astronaut.
|
|
|
|
01/06/2007 02:59:46 PM · #9 |
Redneck kids use them with sunshine for frying ants and starting brush fires.
I think Bear is right about it being a repro lens. I have seen similar things on the "ebay" site while hunting lenses.
Great idea from "madman"
Message edited by author 2007-01-06 15:01:36.
|
|
|
|
01/06/2007 03:18:39 PM · #10 |
I wanna see it on the front of your 5D!!
With an image circle that size, assuming that's where the image was focused, the biggest standard format you could cover would be 4x5" and a 24in lens on that format has about the same FOV as a 180mm lens on a 35mm camera.
It'd be interesting to make a pseudo view camera with a flatbed scanner, but the telescope is a good idea too
|
|
|
|
01/06/2007 03:40:17 PM · #11 |
Originally posted by MadMan2k: Cool. You should build a view camera body to put it on and use a flatbed scanner for a scanning back to make digital files :p |
I'm not quite sure how you would purport this to work... maybe if you disable the light on the scanner to get rid of internal refractions, but it still seems a bit far-fetched to me. The "focus" of the scanner would be hard to determine, possibly a sheet of high-grade lucite-like material to create the film or sheet to be scanned? Would also be an interesting project to try, though. A high-quality flatbed could give you a pretty sweet image size.
|
|
|
|
01/06/2007 03:45:31 PM · #12 |
LOL, the view-camera-with-flatbed idea is out there. It could very well work, but I suspect that the amount of light available might be pretty low for the scanner's detector. I'd have to disable the scanner light source too of course.
I've experimented a little further with it, and the image circle is much larger than I thought. It's more like 300mm; pretty much covers an 8.5x11 inch sheet of paper!
Also, based on my calculations, the focal length is somewhat shorter than I had believed. It's 500mm or perhaps a little less. |
|
|
|
01/06/2007 04:01:55 PM · #13 |
I long agio proposed to SC that I be allowed to use a scanner to capture an image directly, insisting that it qualified as a "camera", but they gently informed me that there was no EXIF data so it was not permissible. I wasn't planning to use a lens, though; I wanted to scan translucent objects on the scanner bed.
R.
|
|
|
|
01/16/2007 02:14:41 AM · #14 |
Sorry for the bump, but I missed the thread on the 6th. I guess the scanner would be a lot of work, but I was thinking of the Leica S1 (almost 10 year old scanning camera with extremely high resolution that let you use just about lens mount you would want to) and the scanning back modules you can get for MF/LF cameras.
I took apart my free all-in-one printer and expiremented with the scanner driver - I was able to get it to scan as I moved the head over a print by hand, but I kind of screwed up the motor and I couldn't figure out how to disable the light source to scan backlit things. I think it would be possible, and I might be buying a 4x5 camera that I can try it with.
I bet someone would look ridiculous shooting with a huge camera like that with a hacked-up desktop scanner crudely attached to the back and a laptop on a second tripod next to it... I'd probably use a Canon 8400, which is 4000dpi IIRC, and that gives you a 20,000px image at 4x5 (yikes).
For focusing, I'd imagine you could use a sheet of graph paper or something on the glass of the scanner, and lock in the settings before taking it off and 'exposing'. To get the control you'd need over all the settings, you might have to write some software for it - that might be out of my range, I've just done some basic C++ and GUI programming, no hardware stuff yet. I'll see if I can tackle it after I get the 4x5, but it'll be a LOT of work.
Actually, come to think of it, a pinhole would be a much easier choice, and easier to attach, since you'd just have to build a box around the scanner and do the software aspect, which *might* be possible in something like Silverfast. Apparently distance from the 'lens' to the sensor plane only controls focal length. Damn, now I really want to try this :p |
|
|
|
01/16/2007 02:36:54 AM · #15 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/02/2026 04:09:30 PM EST.