| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/26/2006 01:52:24 PM · #1 |
| I have about $250 to spend on a new monitor. I know I want flat panel, no less than 17", but what else should I look for in a monitor that will be used extensively on photo editing? |
|
|
|
12/26/2006 01:57:47 PM · #2 |
| $250 Eh? the best thing to do is go to the store where they have moniters on display and check them all for clearity. then buy the best one you can afford. also I would opt for a moniter calibration device. |
|
|
|
12/26/2006 05:17:27 PM · #3 |
| Thanks for the idea. Any other suggestions? |
|
|
|
12/26/2006 05:58:28 PM · #4 |
Things to look for (more or less in order of importance to me):
Native resolution -- the monitor will scale the image to other resolutions, but it's best image will be at the native resolution.
Contrast ratio -- given as a ratio (700:1, 1000:1, etc). The larger the first number, the more contrast between the highlights and shadows. Generally, the higher the better, but be aware up around the 1000:1 mark the monitor may 'add' contrast to your images that won't be there on other monitors.
Viewing angle -- Not really a problem with most modern monitors anymore, but worth checking into. The screen will dim, and possibly fade out completely, when viewed from an angle other than straight on. The wider the angle the better.
Response time -- flat panels don't have refresh rates, so they are easier on the eyes. However they do have a response time. This is how long it takes for a pixel to change. This is most usually only a problem with vidio playback and gaming, but it's worth considering. Most all monitors you will look at will be fast enough for general use and photo editing.
Color controls -- Not all have color controls. Make sure the one you choose does or calibration may become a big problem.
Bezel color -- black makes the screen appear brighter, white makes the screen appear darker. I prefer the neutral colors so it stays out of the way.
---
Find a few that are within your price range and look over the specs. Then post here with your ordered list -- someone will likely have experience with at least a few of your top choices. If not, I'm sure we can find reviews to help you make an informed choice.
David
Message edited by author 2006-12-26 17:58:56. |
|
|
|
12/26/2006 07:03:01 PM · #5 |
make sure its not a TN panel :)
oh and you're ok if its 16ms or less (= approx 60fps) |
|
|
|
01/03/2007 08:00:04 PM · #6 |
| My friend who is a graphic artist/web designer recommends both ViewSonic and Samsung. I love my ViewSonic purchased from NewEgg.com. |
|
|
|
01/04/2007 05:13:00 PM · #7 |
i wouldn't touch Samsung TFT's with a barge pole
careful which viewsonic u purchase - the cheaper TFT's are only 18bit+2 (16.2 mil rather than 16.7 mil) |
|
|
|
01/04/2007 05:25:22 PM · #8 |
| I know back in the day for CRT monitors, pixel pitch was a big factor ontop of the other things mentioned. Basically it was how big the dots on the screen were, the smaller the better. I don't know if this still applies much to LCD displays. |
|
|
|
01/04/2007 07:45:00 PM · #9 |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/03/2026 04:02:32 PM EST.
