| Author | Thread |
|
|
12/19/2006 04:41:44 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by Prof_Fate:
I have the 10-22 and used the 12-24 and I am not that impressed with the sharpness (focus accuracy perhaps_ of the 10-22, especially outdoors. |
Which are you unimpressed with, the Tokina? or the Canon? It occurs to me that I could get the Tokina instead of the Canon and pick up a Sigma 70-200 2.8. Might be stretching a tad, but not much...
|
|
|
|
12/19/2006 05:20:35 PM · #27 |
Originally posted by Army of nOne:
Originally posted by Prof_Fate:
I have the 10-22 and used the 12-24 and I am not that impressed with the sharpness (focus accuracy perhaps_ of the 10-22, especially outdoors. |
Which are you unimpressed with, the Tokina? or the Canon? It occurs to me that I could get the Tokina instead of the Canon and pick up a Sigma 70-200 2.8. Might be stretching a tad, but not much... |
I suggest that before you discount the 10-22, you take a look at what  Bear_Music has done with it. Also, while the difference between 10mm and 12mm may not seem like much, it can be significant. |
|
|
|
12/19/2006 05:40:34 PM · #28 |
| I'd like to say i'd get an HD video camera, but the real answer is. 85 1.8 and a bunch of studio equipment. |
|
|
|
12/19/2006 05:51:58 PM · #29 |
| I'm with Spazmo, nice range and build quality. |
|
|
|
12/19/2006 05:55:42 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by kyebosh:
.... but the real answer is. 85 1.8 and a bunch of studio equipment. |
That'd be useful in a National Park. |
|
|
|
12/19/2006 08:51:09 PM · #31 |
Originally posted by Spazmo99:
That'd be useful in a National Park. |
Lol, yeah, last time I tried getting the bears to come in the "studio" they were strangely uncooperative. Actually, my brother and I did manage to get a bird to land on his head the last time we were out there. I have a nice picture of it somewhere...
|
|
|
|
12/19/2006 09:06:02 PM · #32 |
i'd get the 24mm 1.4 and use my legs to zoom.
guess it wouldn't be the best for nature stuff though. |
|
|
|
12/19/2006 09:11:33 PM · #33 |
I'd go for the Canon EF-S 10-22mm and the EF 24-105mm L IS USM; if you can bear being without that all important 23mm focal length. Might set you back a little more though.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/21/2025 12:43:12 PM EDT.
