DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Why is there such a difference is lens prices?
Pages:  
Showing posts 1 - 10 of 10, (reverse)
AuthorThread
11/29/2006 08:08:35 PM · #1
For example.

I have been looking at getting this one.

Pentax Zoom Normal-Telephoto SMCP-DA 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED Autofocus Lens for Digital SLR

As I shop around to see what other choices I have I see this and think, great 300mm f/2.8 and then I see the price. Wow!!
Sigma Telephoto 300mm f/2.8 EX DG Autofocus Lens for Pentax for $ 2,599.00!!

It seems like anything with a larger aperature has a higher price tag.

Why is that?

Does it really cost anymore to make?

Just wondering...
11/29/2006 08:11:38 PM · #2
Quite a bit more.. large aperture lenses, especially those with constant f settings are quite a bit larger than smaller and variable aperture lenses. They are also more complex.

The Sigma you are looking at is also a "pro" lens as shown by the EX designation.

Message edited by author 2006-11-29 20:11:54.
11/29/2006 08:15:52 PM · #3
Originally posted by lakota:

Sigma Telephoto 300mm f/2.8 EX DG Autofocus Lens for Pentax for $ 2,599.00!!

MMMMMMMM, yummy. I'm a Sigma pro-ponent. EX, though designated as a 'pro' lens, is still (for the most part) priced so a 'non-pro' can still afford it........except for that one GRRRRRRRRRR
11/29/2006 08:16:34 PM · #4
And it's a prime 2.8, you could hook that sucker up to a 2xTC and have a fairly good solution for long range sports shootin. (In good light)
11/29/2006 08:19:42 PM · #5
Originally posted by lakota:

For example.

I have been looking at getting this one.

Pentax Zoom Normal-Telephoto SMCP-DA 50-200mm f/4-5.6 ED Autofocus Lens for Digital SLR

As I shop around to see what other choices I have I see this and think, great 300mm f/2.8 and then I see the price. Wow!!
Sigma Telephoto 300mm f/2.8 EX DG Autofocus Lens for Pentax for $ 2,599.00!!

It seems like anything with a larger aperature has a higher price tag.

Why is that?

Does it really cost anymore to make?

Just wondering...


Yeah, it does cost more.

Take two cars, both will get you from A to B.

One's a no frills subcompact and costs under $10K brand new.

The other's a exotic sports car with a price tag well into 6 figures.

Do you think the two cars cost the same to make?
11/29/2006 08:19:46 PM · #6
Originally posted by wavelength:

And it's a prime 2.8, you could hook that sucker up to a 2xTC and have a fairly good solution for long range sports shootin. (In good light)


That brings up another question. :)
I keep seeing and reading about "prime" lens.

What does prime mean?
11/29/2006 08:22:01 PM · #7
Prime means it is a fixed focal length. ie, it has no zoom capability. Now, you may think "what's the point?" however, you will find a lot of primes are

1. very fast with apertures going upto 1.2 (and in extreme cases 1.0)

2. Higher precision optics. Resulting in sharper images.
11/29/2006 08:25:27 PM · #8
More expensive lenses tend to have more (and much larger) lens elements, exotic glass types, better construction, faster and quieter focusing, and in some cases weatherproof seals and image stabilization.
11/29/2006 08:29:21 PM · #9
Now I understand, thanks!

So many to pick from and so little money for them, lol...
11/29/2006 08:30:16 PM · #10
Originally posted by lakota:

Now I understand, thanks!

So many to pick from and so little money for them, lol...


Yes, such torture can come from this field.
Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/03/2026 04:49:55 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/03/2026 04:49:55 AM EST.