Author | Thread |
|
11/09/2006 04:28:20 PM · #126 |
Originally posted by kudzu: 100 vote bragcheck-in :
Votes: 102
Views: 224
Avg Vote: 6.7255
Comments: 12
Favorites: 2
currently my second highest vote ever... and i only lack 3 favorites to hit the 100 mark... weee! |
Are you going to tell everyone about the 96 people you paid off to have them click the favorites button? ;-P
|
|
|
11/09/2006 04:46:45 PM · #127 |
Originally posted by dallasdux: Are you going to tell everyone about the 96 people you paid off to have them click the favorites button? ;-P |
96? no. just one...
btw... thanks mom!
|
|
|
11/09/2006 05:03:11 PM · #128 |
Votes: 97
Views: 145
Avg Vote: 5.8454
Comments: 6
pretty satisfied :) |
|
|
11/09/2006 05:03:55 PM · #129 |
Originally posted by kudzu: Originally posted by DrAchoo: I think with that score you have found yourself in an Achoo/Ursula sandwich. One of us is higher, one is lower and we are struggling against each other in the MS challenge. |
sandwich, eh? not sure my wife would approve...
off to that thread to cheer for ursula... |
Ahhhh! I like you! |
|
|
11/09/2006 05:41:39 PM · #130 |
Votes: 93
Views: 116
Avg Vote: 4.7312
Comments: 1
|
|
|
11/09/2006 08:49:43 PM · #131 |
Anyone want to take bets on which side of 5 I finish on?

Message edited by author 2006-11-09 20:49:50. |
|
|
11/09/2006 09:00:28 PM · #132 |
This is my first challenge.I can't seem to view stats on my submission; or even sure how to. Perhaps I can't being only a registered user and not a member.
Thanks in advance for help.
-Brian |
|
|
11/09/2006 09:07:39 PM · #133 |
Never mind...figured it out -DOY!! 8^) |
|
|
11/09/2006 09:23:19 PM · #134 |
Originally posted by Nuzzer: Anyone want to take bets on which side of 5 I finish on?
|
5+ |
|
|
11/10/2006 08:20:37 AM · #135 |
I don't get it. I took what I thought was my best entry yet and here is what I'm getting, which isn't bad, but not what I expected:
Votes: 119
Views: 156
Avg Vote: 5.3025
Comments: 6
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
It came out just like I wanted and I had almost 0 PP (pretty much just resize).
On maybe a related topic, a lot of my photos are getting comments that they are too dark. When I vote, the grayscale meter does blend a little at the dark end, which makes me think I would over compensate by making things brighter.
Maybe I just like dark images....
Scott
Message edited by author 2006-11-10 08:20:59. |
|
|
11/10/2006 11:33:25 AM · #136 |
Originally posted by scott180:
On maybe a related topic, a lot of my photos are getting comments that they are too dark. When I vote, the grayscale meter does blend a little at the dark end, which makes me think I would over compensate by making things brighter.
Maybe I just like dark images....
Scott |
Literally dark (not enough light) or dark imagery? If it is the overall picture is not bright enough, it could be your peripheral (monitor) settings. My first couple of entries were too bright because I edited them on a PC with a really 'dark' monitor.
|
|
|
11/10/2006 11:34:35 AM · #137 |
Votes: 116
Views: 145
Avg Vote: 4.8793
Comments: 2
Well, up to two comments (and score is up just a bit), but both comments are complimentary of the image. Still no indications of why people are handing out lots of 4's on it.
|
|
|
11/10/2006 11:55:23 AM · #138 |
In the case of this challenge, I shot some stuff and the brighter areas of the shot looked blown out on the LCD on the camera. Maybe I should be reviewing them with the max info that shows the brightness histogram and the zebra pattern on blown out parts.
So I tend to push toward the darker end to prevent the blown out stuff. But even the picture I submitted, where a commentor thought it was dark, I had boosted the exposure in RAW a half stop.
I'm thinking of getting one of those spyder monitor calibrators. Anyone use one before?
I don't think my subjects are "dark", I just seem to like the darker tones.
Scott |
|
|
11/10/2006 12:18:49 PM · #139 |
I had my entry in the Faceless Portrait challenge suffer because it was dark. I unfortunately don't have any calibrating devices but looking at the calibration chart beneath entries when you vote I could see the whole range of shades fine. I know this may not be the best method of having the brightness set but it works well with my printer too so I stick with it. Unfortunately monitors vary and voters didn't like it too much so I viewed it on some other monitors and on some I could see it properly and others I couldn't.
|
|
|
11/10/2006 01:50:28 PM · #140 |
Votes: 126
Views: 156
Avg Vote: 6.1032
Comments: 5
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 11/10/06 01:49 pm
hopefully i dont fall below 6 |
|
|
11/10/2006 01:57:39 PM · #141 |
It's amazing what a psychological effect that number 6 has. A shot containing it seems soooooooo much better than one that sits at 5.9999!
(and for those like Doc, kiwiness, librodo, most of the Icelanders, etc., replace 6 with 7 or 8 ;) ) |
|
|
11/10/2006 01:59:55 PM · #142 |
Originally posted by BeeCee: It's amazing what a psychological effect that number 6 has. A shot containing it seems soooooooo much better than one that sits at 5.9999!
(and for those like Doc, kiwiness, librodo, most of the Icelanders, etc., replace 6 with 7 or 8 ;) ) |
I think Langdon needs to code a bias of 1.0 vote for everyone using iceland IP :D |
|
|
11/10/2006 02:12:15 PM · #143 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: Originally posted by BeeCee: It's amazing what a psychological effect that number 6 has. A shot containing it seems soooooooo much better than one that sits at 5.9999!
(and for those like Doc, kiwiness, librodo, most of the Icelanders, etc., replace 6 with 7 or 8 ;) ) |
I think Langdon needs to code a bias of 1.0 vote for everyone using iceland IP :D |
AND Santa Clara, California, of course ;) |
|
|
11/10/2006 04:57:17 PM · #144 |
Originally posted by BeeCee: Originally posted by gaurawa:
I think Langdon needs to code a bias of 1.0 vote for everyone using iceland IP :D |
AND Santa Clara, California, of course ;) |
Yes, -1 for Iceland and +1 for Santa Clara please ;) |
|
|
11/10/2006 04:59:13 PM · #145 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: Yes, -1 for Iceland and +1 for Santa Clara please ;) |
Based on my score, people must think I'm from Iceland ;-)
Message edited by author 2006-11-10 16:59:35.
|
|
|
11/10/2006 05:47:08 PM · #146 |
Originally posted by dallasdux: Originally posted by gaurawa: Yes, -1 for Iceland and +1 for Santa Clara please ;) |
Based on my score, people must think I'm from Iceland ;-) |
After the bias addition or before ? |
|
|
11/10/2006 09:49:49 PM · #147 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: Originally posted by BeeCee: Originally posted by gaurawa:
I think Langdon needs to code a bias of 1.0 vote for everyone using iceland IP :D |
AND Santa Clara, California, of course ;) |
Yes, -1 for Iceland and +1 for Santa Clara please ;) |
Ummm.... that wasn't exactly my idea..... :) |
|
|
11/10/2006 11:05:54 PM · #148 |
Originally posted by BeeCee: It's amazing what a psychological effect that number 6 has. A shot containing it seems soooooooo much better than one that sits at 5.9999!
(and for those like Doc, kiwiness, librodo, most of the Icelanders, etc., replace 6 with 7 or 8 ;) ) |
Yeh! i'm a sex addict.
ooops! i mean six :) |
|
|
11/10/2006 11:20:00 PM · #149 |
Originally posted by gaurawa: Originally posted by dallasdux: Originally posted by gaurawa: Yes, -1 for Iceland and +1 for Santa Clara please ;) |
Based on my score, people must think I'm from Iceland ;-) |
After the bias addition or before ? |
I don't know. Brain...too tired to think....I was thinking somehow or another I was getting pegged with -1 based on my low scores.
|
|
|
11/10/2006 11:51:21 PM · #150 |
Votes: 132
Views: 184
Avg Vote: 5.0606
Comments: 6
Favorites: 0
Wish Lists: 0
Updated: 11/10/06 11:48 pm
and i thought it was a good photo....oh well... |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/27/2025 09:56:32 PM EDT.