| Author | Thread | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 12:43:08 PM · #1			 | 
		
		//www.flickr.com/groups/hdr/pool/Pretty amazing stuff, just curious how difficult the pp is, and would there be a challenge that this would be legal in?
  Message edited by author 2006-11-09 12:45:16. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 12:45:15 PM · #2			 | 
		
		some HDR information.
 There are several thread re:HDR photos in the forums. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 12:45:49 PM · #3			 | 
		
		 | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 02:32:32 PM · #4			 | 
		
		This guy is amazing, and wrote a nice tutorial which is in one of this months' UK magazines:
 //petemc.net/hdr-guide/
 Click on the photos at the top, very nice!
  Message edited by author 2006-11-09 14:32:46. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 02:49:29 PM · #5			 | 
		
		 | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 03:18:59 PM · #6			 | 
		
		| Probably cost like $800.  Site is down now, but I want that software. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 03:29:22 PM · #7			 | 
		
		Photomatix is shareware: $99
 
 //www.versiontracker.com/dyn/moreinfo/win/28527
 
 For Mac version click the Mac OS link in the top right.
  Message edited by author 2006-11-09 15:29:28. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 03:33:11 PM · #8			 | 
		
		Originally posted by BobsterLobster:   This guy is amazing, and wrote a nice tutorial which is in one of this months' UK magazines:
 //petemc.net/hdr-guide/
 Click on the photos at the top, very nice!  |   
 
 brilliant Tutorial! cheers for that
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 03:36:23 PM · #9			 | 
		
		 
 
 hdr test
 
 i've had some fun with it, but my problem is that i rarely use a tripod.
  
  Message edited by author 2006-11-09 15:38:38.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 03:47:46 PM · #10			 | 
		
		 | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 04:02:02 PM · #11			 | 
		
		Oh wow, cannot believe this thread has just come up, I had just logged onto here to start a Photomatix thread, needn't bother now...
 
 I have just been playing with photomatix with some multiple images I took today and cannot believe some of the results I have been getting. Pity we cant use this in challenges. OK, links to my three initial images and my final HDR image.. I love this, obviously needs some playing with, but blows away the CS2 HDR facility..
 
    
 
  
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 04:06:00 PM · #12			 | 
		
		
 
 u can use this in the challenges. Use raw shooter to under and over expose.
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 04:39:54 PM · #13			 | 
		
		i just done one right now with photomatix pro.. very cool stuff, had to tweek a bit in photoshop but i likes
 
   |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 04:45:05 PM · #14			 | 
		
		Originally posted by MAK:   i just done one right now with photomatix pro.. very cool stuff, had to tweek a bit in photoshop but i likes
 
    |   
 
 Nice one MAK.. love it!! |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 04:45:40 PM · #15			 | 
		
		would this style also be possible if you made multiple curves a djustment layers for each part of a photo... then masked off the portions of the photo not relating to that specific curves a djustment?
 
 i know this photo was edited that way..
 
  
 
 -Dan
 
 
  |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 05:07:34 PM · #16			 | 
		
		This one is tone mapped in Photomatix Pro from a single RAW exposure; no sandwiching of multiple exposures or processings was needed. It's even a legal process in basic editing.
 
  
 
 R. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 06:21:05 PM · #17			 | 
		
		Originally posted by I Enjoy Ham:   would this style also be possible if you made multiple curves a djustment layers for each part of a photo... then masked off the portions of the photo not relating to that specific curves a djustment?
 
 i know this photo was edited that way..
 
  
 
 -Dan  |   
 
 sounds like a lot of hard work.. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 06:26:51 PM · #18			 | 
		
		A recent entry using HDR (Photomatix).
 
  
  Message edited by author 2006-11-09 19:18:53. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 06:49:51 PM · #19			 | 
		
		Yup! Tried it with Photomatrix...
        |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 07:08:48 PM · #20			 | 
		
		| I am going to try it with cinepaint right now.  I guess it is the gimp of HDR because it can handle 16 bit images.  I will post my results. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 07:13:43 PM · #21			 | 
		
		| No matter what picture I use in CS2 HDR it comes back with the error "Not enough dynamic range" and will not complete the HDR. I don't know what to do. Anyone know what may be wrong? |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 07:15:57 PM · #22			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Bear_Music:   This one is tone mapped in Photomatix Pro from a single RAW exposure; no sandwiching of multiple exposures or processings was needed. It's even a legal process in basic editing.
 
  
 
 R.  |   
 
 Bear's image single handedly sold me on the program. Btw, here's one of my own shots using the tone mapping:
 
  
  Message edited by author 2006-11-09 19:16:30. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 07:16:43 PM · #23			 | 
		
		| in photoshop you HAVE to use multiple images of the same image.. and you can not take the same image and change the exposure of it in a raw editor.. it has to be different images.. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 07:58:08 PM · #24			 | 
		
		Originally posted by Southern Gentleman:   No matter what picture I use in CS2 HDR it comes back with the error "Not enough dynamic range" and will not complete the HDR. I don't know what to do. Anyone know what may be wrong?  |   
 
 Either use a RAW image at 16 bit or..
 Change your photo to 16 bit and try that. |  
  | 
		
			| 
				
										
			 | 
			
11/09/2006 08:05:13 PM · #25			 | 
		
		You have to remove the exif data from the input images.  With the exif data intact, Photoshop thinks that the exposure is the same on all images.
  |  
  | 
			Home -
			
Challenges -
			
Community -
			
League -
			
Photos -
			
Cameras -
			
Lenses -
			
Learn -
			
			
Help -
			
Terms of Use -
			
Privacy -
			
Top ^
		DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
		
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
		
Current Server Time: 11/03/2025 10:22:01 PM EST.