| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/31/2006 10:31:50 AM · #1 |
Okay, this is a really anal suggestion, but it's also really easy to implement. I don't think 3 challenges is a small enough minimum. My favorites list is now cluttered with people who only entered 3 challenges, some of these are left over from when I first started voting and was scoring people too high.
I want the minimum to be 5, but even 4 would clean a lot of these people off of my list.
|
|
|
|
10/31/2006 10:53:36 AM · #2 |
i think i speak for most people when i say, "huh?"
why don't you just remove them from your list? |
|
|
|
10/31/2006 10:54:42 AM · #3 |
Originally posted by posthumous:
...I want the minimum to be 5, but even 4 would clean a lot of these people off of my list. |
Agreed. Even more (say 10) might work better. |
|
|
|
10/31/2006 10:54:54 AM · #4 |
I'm referring to statistically favorite photographers, a list you can reach via the "Manage Your Favorites" link when you're looking at your favorites.
|
|
|
|
10/31/2006 10:55:43 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by glad2badad:
Originally posted by posthumous:
...I want the minimum to be 5, but even 4 would clean a lot of these people off of my list. |
Agreed. Even more (say 10) might work better. |
I'm okay with 10. That's the number I tend to use for myself.
|
|
|
|
10/31/2006 11:12:23 AM · #6 |
ahhhhhhhh i gotcha
i thought you meant people who YOU ADDED to your fav. photographers...
you meant the people who were AUTOMATICALLY ADDED to that particular list
i agree, it's probably a good idea to raise the minimum number |
|
|
|
10/31/2006 12:09:52 PM · #7 |
| Yes, please. Let's change 3 to to 10 somewhere in the system configuration. :) |
|
|
|
10/31/2006 01:09:38 PM · #8 |
agreed
Originally posted by posthumous:
I'm okay with 10. That's the number I tend to use for myself. |
|
|
|
|
11/01/2006 03:19:24 AM · #9 |
While considering changing the page, a bit more control would be even nicer. Such as choose minimum number of votes placed, max number or even a static number (all photographers I've placed exactly 4 votes on) -- this as well as a time frame filter.
This would give much greater control over the results, while using code similar to what the user search page appears to use.
David
|
|
|
|
11/01/2006 07:35:39 AM · #10 |
| Aye, an option to control the minimum would be nice. |
|
|
|
11/01/2006 08:44:11 AM · #11 |
I think it would also be nice to be able to sort by No. of Votes.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/29/2025 06:58:59 PM EDT.
