| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/30/2006 05:21:55 AM · #1 |
I am looking at getting some glass for my canon and I don't have alot of cash. A local store here has a combo of the tamron AF28-80 aspherical zoom lens and the AF70-300 DI LD Macro zoom in a price range that I can afford.
Most of of my shots are done in studio or outdoors, so I am not so worried about them being abit slower.
I was just wondering what are some peoples opinion on sharpness and quality of build.
|
|
|
|
10/30/2006 05:33:54 AM · #2 |
i have the 70-300 for my sony and i love it!
For me it is solid and well made with sharp images but there is some CA focus is good but if were to buy again i would have a longer look at the sigma apo lens. |
|
|
|
10/30/2006 01:56:06 PM · #3 |
Thank you richard42.
Is there anybody else that wants to comment?
|
|
|
|
10/30/2006 01:59:13 PM · #4 |
| If it is the same 70-300mm tamron that I have, I like it fine. It however is very noisy, and seems to take a little more effort to get on focus. Overall not bad. |
|
|
|
10/30/2006 02:25:10 PM · #5 |
I'm not too sure about the tamron lenses, but Ritz Camera has a Sigma two lense combo that is a good price. I have one of the lenses and I love it. They only cost $207.
Sigma 70-300mm f4-5.6 DL Macro and 28-80mm f3.5-5.6 Macro
//www.ritzcamera.com/product/253091516.htm |
|
|
|
10/30/2006 02:31:59 PM · #6 |
| I picked up my Tamron 70-300 for $100 on ebay. I don't remember the dealer. I could look it up however. |
|
|
|
10/30/2006 02:36:10 PM · #7 |
generally speaking ... you get what you pay for
i'd spend the money you have on ONE lens - do a lot of research, go to pbase.com and see other peoples shots with those lenses - read every review you can find
if the deal seems to good to be true, that's because it is
my opinion |
|
|
|
10/30/2006 02:44:20 PM · #8 |
| I don't know about the 28-80 or the 70-300, but the Tamron 28-75 F/2.8 XR Di is a top notch lens... |
|
|
|
10/30/2006 03:32:30 PM · #9 |
Originally posted by Count:
I don't know about the 28-80 or the 70-300, but the Tamron 28-75 F/2.8 XR Di is a top notch lens... |
If you don't need the reach from the 70-300, I agree. That's a good start for quality lenses. Then save up for a longer lens.
TYPICALLY, price does reflect quality...But, there are exceptions.
|
|
|
|
10/30/2006 03:37:55 PM · #10 |
Originally posted by Count:
I don't know about the 28-80 or the 70-300, but the Tamron 28-75 F/2.8 XR Di is a top notch lens... |
exactly what i thought, when i first read the thread!
take the 28-75, it's a tack sharp lense, especially with the 350d, reaches almost the quality of primes...
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/11/2026 05:49:12 PM EST.
