| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/13/2006 03:23:07 PM · #26 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
LOL. It's a shadow. Nobody's THAT bad at Photoshop. Well, maybe the "photo professionals" they asked. :-/ |
maybe the "photo professionals" they asked was the guy who altered the beruit bombing photo... or his editor...
|
|
|
|
10/13/2006 03:26:15 PM · #27 |
See, all the hardwork our site council puts in to prove photos as original. They far exceed the average photo professionals.
Really, I think they should simply look at the Exif or the negatives. |
|
|
|
10/13/2006 03:27:39 PM · #28 |
| Maybe it's extreme barrel distortion...? ;-P |
|
|
|
10/13/2006 03:27:56 PM · #29 |
Originally posted by kudzu:
Originally posted by scalvert:
LOL. It's a shadow. Nobody's THAT bad at Photoshop. Well, maybe the "photo professionals" they asked. :-/ |
maybe the "photo professionals" they asked was the guy who altered the beruit bombing photo... or his editor... |
ummm.. or his competitors
|
|
|
|
10/13/2006 03:28:49 PM · #30 |
Originally posted by article:
Eyewitness News showed the photo to several photography professionals who all said it appeared to have been doctored and likely was not a natural shadow. |
I guess we need to define "natural."
:) |
|
|
|
10/13/2006 03:35:10 PM · #31 |
I just did a rather extensive web search (I'm bored) and I see no mention of this story anywhere else - around Orlando or otherwise.
|
|
|
|
10/13/2006 03:38:39 PM · #32 |
Originally posted by idnic:
I just did a rather extensive web search (I'm bored) and I see no mention of this story anywhere else - around Orlando or otherwise. |
Clearly, the story was doctored. ;-) |
|
|
|
10/13/2006 03:40:34 PM · #33 |
Originally posted by scalvert:
Originally posted by idnic:
I just did a rather extensive web search (I'm bored) and I see no mention of this story anywhere else - around Orlando or otherwise. |
Clearly, the story was doctored. ;-) |
MS word is a high-tech software package that journalist use to alter news stories. ;)
|
|
|
|
10/13/2006 03:44:24 PM · #34 |
| Replicating that photo to determine whether it's real or fake should be the next challenge. |
|
|
|
10/13/2006 04:05:25 PM · #35 |
Originally posted by idnic:
I just did a rather extensive web search (I'm bored) and I see no mention of this story anywhere else - around Orlando or otherwise. |
I bet it̢۪s a political conspiracy! It can̢۪t be just a coincidence this story would break just before an election!
|
|
|
|
10/13/2006 04:08:37 PM · #36 |
Originally posted by oOWonderBreadOo:
what's really sad is that this photographer's name is being dragged through the mud |
Yep I agree, if it turns out not to true at all it really sucks for this guy and his photography business and name.
|
|
|
|
10/13/2006 04:32:04 PM · #37 |
LOL @ this thread. Nobody can tell what that thing is without A.) seeing the original or B.) at least seeing a larger photo than the one they have on that web site. For all we know those professionals they consulted are idiots who can't tell the difference but I'm guessing they at least had a better look at it than us. Speaking of which wasn't there a recent thread about a microphone cord that was supposedly cloned out but really wasn't and a bunch of us thought foul play? Not very hard to fool a bunch of "professionals" now is it? ;)
Message edited by author 2006-10-13 17:51:19.
|
|
|
|
10/13/2006 06:06:27 PM · #38 |
Originally posted by oOWonderBreadOo:
what's really sad is that this photographer's name is being dragged through the mud just because of bad lighting. Man- it's one thing to have bad lighting but another to be accused of sexual PS manipulation on a child.
Tell that mother her seven year old shouldn't be wearing such a low cut shirt if she's gonna throw a fit about this. |
the photog's name or the studio name is not mentioned.
and i agree, good point: where the heck is the shirt???
|
|
|
|
10/13/2006 06:12:01 PM · #39 |
| In the fark.com thread, someone mentioned that the shirt is more visible if you watch the video, which zooms in a bit more. |
|
|
|
10/13/2006 06:31:15 PM · #40 |
oops. my mistake, didn't watch the video yet and indeed they do drag the studio's name through the mud.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/21/2025 07:11:58 PM EDT.
