| Author | Thread |
|
|
10/05/2006 01:23:16 PM · #1 |
Is there any examples of Liquify being declared legal in advnced editing. If so, how far can it be taken?
|
|
|
|
10/05/2006 01:39:21 PM · #2 |
| My take: Liquify itself is legal (I've used it to touch up an edge or help with cloning), but you can't use it in a manner where the distortion itself becomes a new feature. |
|
|
|
10/05/2006 03:17:30 PM · #3 |
Say for example you wanted to use it to slim a model a bit?
|
|
|
|
10/05/2006 03:45:49 PM · #4 |
| Sounds iffy, but it probably depends on how much slimming you do. I'd run it by SC for an opinion. |
|
|
|
10/05/2006 04:52:52 PM · #5 |
Since Advanced Rules are results oriented, not technique oriented, the only real question is whether the major elements rule gets violated in the process. You're definitely moving things around, so think about whether that fat roll you're removing is "major" ;-)
I know mine would be :-P
If you think you might be in violation, open a ticket as Shannon suggested; try to give us a couple days to get consensus. |
|
|
|
10/05/2006 04:59:48 PM · #6 |
Yes, most like it would be to slim a fat roll or neck line. I've got a while to think about it though Free Study for this month is still away off.
Thanks guys.
|
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 09/23/2025 06:42:06 PM EDT.
