| Author | Thread |
|
|
08/25/2006 05:54:12 PM · #1 |
Challenge: Pinhole Challenge
Challenge Description: Submit a photo that conveys an infinite depth of field. |
|
|
|
08/25/2006 06:22:48 PM · #2 |
I used to love pinhole photography. Once I used a lens mount cover to make a pinhole lens for my 35mm Minolta.
Haven't experimented with digital pinhole photography, but I'd love to and this seems like a great challenge.
|
|
|
|
08/25/2006 06:34:39 PM · #3 |
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:21:39 AM · #4 |
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:22:43 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by yanko:
an infinite depth of field. |
That means everything is in focus, right?
Interesting idea. |
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:24:03 AM · #6 |
Originally posted by crayon:
Originally posted by yanko:
an infinite depth of field. |
That means everything is in focus, right?
Interesting idea. |
Yes. |
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:29:21 AM · #7 |
I want this challenge too.
|
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:32:57 AM · #8 |
| a landscape photographer's dream...basically just a free study for us...so yeah, sure, I'm up for this :) |
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:34:08 AM · #9 |
| anybody ever tried digital pinhole? I heard you can do it by poking a hole in black paper and using that as your 'lense'. Im tempted to try it, but I smell a lotta sensor cleaning! |
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:36:07 AM · #10 |
Good idea, title would be confusing for some. I imagine a dozen entries with a hole in a piece of paper. :P. I wouls like this challenge too.
This is the same as hyperfocal distance, yes?
Is this a good example?
good suggestion.
|
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:36:52 AM · #11 |
Originally posted by photoheathen:
a landscape photographer's dream...basically just a free study for us...so yeah, sure, I'm up for this :) |
Yes and no... I'd vote higher for a very close subject with infinitely deep background than I would a landscape shot. It's easy to get deep DOF when objects are hundreds of yards, even miles away.
Now put something the size of a coke can close in the forground and still have focus deep behind it, that's something else :-)
|
|
|
|
10/04/2006 02:41:35 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by fotomann_forever:
Originally posted by photoheathen:
a landscape photographer's dream...basically just a free study for us...so yeah, sure, I'm up for this :) |
Yes and no... I'd vote higher for a very close subject with infinitely deep background than I would a landscape shot. It's easy to get deep DOF when objects are hundreds of yards, even miles away.
Now put something the size of a coke can close in the forground and still have focus deep behind it, that's something else :-) |
ehh, it's not that hard :) |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 07/28/2025 01:13:09 PM EDT.
