DPChallenge: A Digital Photography Contest You are not logged in. (log in or register
 

DPChallenge Forums >> Hardware and Software >> Your Camera of Choice? Why? Time Spent 4 Research?
Pages:  
Showing posts 26 - 29 of 29, (reverse)
AuthorThread
09/26/2006 12:42:26 AM · #26
Also keep in mind that the digital bodies will have a limited life compared to film bodies. Make sure the system you pick has the lenses (length, speed, weight e.t.c.) that you personally prefer - with some growth.

It's the glass that makes the picture more so then the body - ok I know that's less true with digital then film but you get the idea.

** Didn't hit refresh so duplicated the previous post basically **

Message edited by author 2006-09-26 00:43:25.
09/26/2006 01:14:51 AM · #27
The decision was more a series of decisions:
- Decided to go skip out on ultra-zoom on the basis that I would outgrow that too someday.
- Decided to go for a DSLR mainly because I wanted to get the shot when I pressed the button; although all the other benefits added to the case.
- Decided this should be either Canon or Nikon based on the idea that you buy into a system and these two were the leaders and looked most set to stay.
- Decided on Canon based on the more extensive (superior?)lens collection, IS and USM technology.
- Decided on the 350D or 20D (options available at the time) because everything above that was simply out of my price range.
- Decided against the 20D because my wife found it too large and cumbersome (this is the only point where I have regrets), and anyway the 350D has essentially the same CMOS sensor and DIGIC II chip.

So, I went for the 350D because it satisfied our requirements and budget. Maybe I will outgrow this too someday although my photography will have to improve a fair bit before this will be needed.

Each decision above was the product of on-line research during lunch breaks and visits to camera shops. It was an iterative process over about 2 months that I thoroughly enjoyed because of how much I learnt.

Message edited by author 2006-09-26 01:35:22.
10/05/2006 06:12:51 AM · #28
I spent over 2 years deciding.

In the meantime, I spent several hours each week learning. I upgraded my P&S in the meantime as well.

When the 20D was released, I wanted it BAD. But I had to be patient. I spent a big chunk of money going back to visit my parents for almost two months.

When I got back to Taiwan and started working again, the possibility came up to have my eyes lasered, so I spent my camera budget on that... I still feel that this was a great tradeoff as I was starting to have some problems with constant use of contacts...

But as time went on, I got to learn a lot more about cameras and I came to find appreciation for the other brands. There is a lot that I love about the Nikon series and I even drool a bit at the D80...

Having started using a camera with IS, I've since become quite interested in cameras that have this built in to the body.

But in the end, I wanted to buy something that had an excellent sensor with the possibility of moving upwards... The opportunity came up to pick up some cheap second hand L glass and I made my decision.

A couple of months later, I impulsively went out and paid 100 bucks US more than I could have if I had waited a month and a half for a 30D.

The low noise for long exposures attracted me, as did the 5 fps and availability of 2nd hand quality glass where I lived.

I've spent approximately 3500 bucks (Canadian) so far on camera gear and I've got a few more purchases to go.

Unfortunately, an unexpected root canal and a crown is going to have to replace one of my desired lenses.. :( Income is limited because I just started school again.

If I were to get a second body, I'd consider a D80 or a Sigma SD14, as a lower grade body, but if I had cash, and wanted to upgrade, I'd probably upgrade to having a full frame. Maybe a second hand 5D in a year or two. Or four.

Message edited by author 2006-10-05 06:14:39.
10/05/2006 06:30:08 AM · #29
I went for Olympus E-1 for various reasons.
At the time, Canon had no good kit lenses for their cameras. (EF-S wasn't born yet). I was considering Fuji S-2 until I saw the price of the Nikkor 17-55/2.8. In the end I went for Olympus after simply looking at the photos from each camera, and reading buyers satisfactions.
Canon had front/back focus, no matching lenses.
The Fuji was nice, but the lenses were to expeensive
The Olympus has very good color, fantastic body, matching lenses, all weather sealed in a compact package.

I might choose differntly today...


Pages:  
Current Server Time: 01/12/2026 01:08:51 AM

Please log in or register to post to the forums.


Home - Challenges - Community - League - Photos - Cameras - Lenses - Learn - Help - Terms of Use - Privacy - Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2026 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 01/12/2026 01:08:51 AM EST.