Author | Thread |
|
09/25/2006 01:23:21 AM · #1 |
I can't relate to this? :P
|
|
|
09/25/2006 01:24:34 AM · #2 |
|
|
09/25/2006 01:27:40 AM · #3 |
Karmabreeze suggested it here on September 6th :-) I think it's a very original challenge topic, myself. I look forward to seeing some truly bizarre entries, and very possibly some thought-provoking ones as well.
R.
|
|
|
09/25/2006 01:30:02 AM · #4 |
Yah......We can have duckies and woodies at last.....................
|
|
|
09/25/2006 01:30:36 AM · #5 |
Originally posted by Bosborne: can't relate to what? |
I'm just being goofy.
|
|
|
09/25/2006 01:33:31 AM · #6 |
Ha..I didn't even see the new topic. Just read your post...
So I'm the one that can't relate....ha
But I still think the topic's a strange one..... |
|
|
09/25/2006 01:34:26 AM · #7 |
Hey Robert...ie means "that is", not "for example". The description would imply that you need to use a carrot and a yo-yo... ;0) |
|
|
09/25/2006 01:35:47 AM · #8 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo: Hey Robert...ie means "that is", not "for example". The description would imply that you need to use a carrot and a yo-yo... ;0) |
Oh no. That's going to open up a can of words!
|
|
|
09/25/2006 01:39:49 AM · #9 |
Already got my idea, and it does NOT include carrots OR yoyos! |
|
|
09/25/2006 01:55:31 AM · #10 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo: Hey Robert...ie means "that is", not "for example". The description would imply that you need to use a carrot and a yo-yo... ;0) |
I'm very surprised Bear didn't pick that up. It's a very common mistake - people confuse i.e. with e.g.. I expect Langdon will change the Challenge description in due course.
edit: Hmmm. I just read the original suggestion - it's quite possible that the original suggestion was specifically a carrot and yo-yo restricted challenge.
Message edited by author 2006-09-25 01:59:39. |
|
|
09/25/2006 09:52:09 AM · #11 |
Harkens back to "Take Two" but this time you get to pick!!
 |
|
|
09/25/2006 10:06:06 AM · #12 |
Originally posted by Pug-H: Originally posted by DrAchoo: Hey Robert...ie means "that is", not "for example". The description would imply that you need to use a carrot and a yo-yo... ;0) |
I'm very surprised Bear didn't pick that up. It's a very common mistake - people confuse i.e. with e.g.. I expect Langdon will change the Challenge description in due course.
edit: Hmmm. I just read the original suggestion - it's quite possible that the original suggestion was specifically a carrot and yo-yo restricted challenge. |
Gather exactly two objects that are completely unrelated (for example, a carrot and a yo-yo) and make some sort of sense out of their combination, photographically speaking.
As of 10:05 am (server time) this was the description. Apparently, it's been changed?
Message edited by author 2006-09-25 10:06:36. |
|
|
09/25/2006 10:29:52 AM · #13 |
got a cute idea - just have to try and find time to shoot it before I leave for AK on the 2nd
|
|
|
09/25/2006 10:39:37 AM · #14 |
Originally posted by DrAchoo: Hey Robert...ie means "that is", not "for example". The description would imply that you need to use a carrot and a yo-yo... ;0) |
e.g. - exemplar gratia - for example
i.e. - id est - that is to say.
pedants of the world unite.
|
|
|
09/25/2006 11:34:28 AM · #15 |
I meant it to mean "like" or "for example", which seems to be more common usage than "that is to say". I tend to use ie. and eg. interchangeably. Probably not good for someone who is supposed to be a university trained writer, but that's what the editing staff is for, eh?
Now the question is, can I come up with an idea for my own challenge suggestion?
|
|
|
09/25/2006 11:36:35 AM · #16 |
Originally posted by karmat: Gather exactly two objects that are completely unrelated (for example, a carrot and a yo-yo) and make some sort of sense out of their combination, photographically speaking.
As of 10:05 am (server time) this was the description. Apparently, it's been changed? |
Yeah, it's been fixed. Since Doc seemed to toss it in my lap, I lateraled it to Langdon last night in a heads-up message.
R.
|
|
|
09/25/2006 12:23:49 PM · #17 |
Unrelated...such as me and my camera. check my portfolio for the proof there. ;)
|
|
|
09/25/2006 12:25:48 PM · #18 |
Originally posted by Bear_Music: Yeah, it's been fixed. Since Doc seemed to toss it in my lap, I lateraled it to Langdon last night in a heads-up message.
R. |
Ya, rereading the post, I'm not sure why I mixed your name up in it... ;)
|
|
|
09/25/2006 01:21:11 PM · #19 |
It sounds like the title will/could make or break the concept rather than "their combination, photographically speaking" much more challenging me thinks than 'title speaking' Perhaps with a manditory title like "object 1 & object 2 = sense photographically speaking" or titled hidden until voting is over...
Message edited by author 2006-09-25 13:30:29. |
|
|
09/25/2006 01:34:38 PM · #20 |
oooo yoyo's... now that has me thinkin!
I was going to skip this one but maybe not now! hehehehehe
|
|
|
09/25/2006 08:40:33 PM · #21 |
Where's the proverbial monkey and the football? |
|
|
09/26/2006 03:55:56 AM · #22 |
A woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle
Would that be accepted? Well, making the fish ride the bike will be the real challenge!
Anyway, I have another idea which is a play of words. It is often easier to find funny things in languages other than your mother tongue, so us non-english might have an advantage there!
Have several ideas, actually, PM to me if you need inspiration!
â¢Ã»â¢Ã»ÂI
|
|
|
09/26/2006 04:33:41 AM · #23 |
.
Message edited by author 2006-09-26 04:35:03.
|
|
|
09/26/2006 06:00:46 PM · #24 |
Took my shot today. Tried one pair of items and the shot way stunk. Came across a couple of other items and they seemed to fit well even though they have nothign to do with each other. This could be a real pretty or real ugly challenge. |
|
|
09/29/2006 02:07:29 PM · #25 |
Not too many entries yet.
>
Lack of ideas or busy with other challenges? |
|
Home -
Challenges -
Community -
League -
Photos -
Cameras -
Lenses -
Learn -
Help -
Terms of Use -
Privacy -
Top ^
DPChallenge, and website content and design, Copyright © 2001-2025 Challenging Technologies, LLC.
All digital photo copyrights belong to the photographers and may not be used without permission.
Current Server Time: 08/27/2025 02:10:20 PM EDT.